Ingo Asche
2022-Dec-08 09:22 UTC
[Samba] File server joined to a samba domain accessed by windows 10-11 clients, works via ip no via dns name
@Rowland: Just to be on the sure side I have checked DNS for the kerberos and ldap entries from NAS side. nslookup -type=any _kerberos._udp.service.mydomain.de Server:???????? 192.168.181.80 Address:??????? 192.168.181.80#53 _kerberos._udp.service.mydomain.de????? service = 0 100 88 dc1.service.mydomain.de. _kerberos._udp.service.mydomain.de????? service = 0 100 88 dc0.service.mydomain.de. _kerberos._udp.service.mydomain.de????? service = 0 100 88 dc2.service.mydomain.de. nslookup -type=any _ldap._tcp.service.mydomain.de Server:???????? 192.168.181.80 Address:??????? 192.168.181.80#53 _ldap._tcp.service.mydomain.de? service = 0 100 389 dc0.service.mydomain.de. _ldap._tcp.service.mydomain.de? service = 0 100 389 dc2.service.mydomain.de. _ldap._tcp.service.mydomain.de? service = 0 100 389 dc1.service.mydomain.de. (I have to use nslookup, host command doesn't exist on Synology NAS) So I'm pretty sure DNS still works... Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama 'Ingo Asche' via samba schrieb am 07.12.2022 um 22:24:> Hi Roy, > > I'm afraid not. > > My systems are all 64bit. And I'm already on 2:4.17.3 at dfsg-3. > > Regards > > Ingo > https://github.com/WAdama > > spindles seven via samba schrieb am 07.12.2022 um 20:09: >> On? 07 December 2022 14:25 Ingo Asche wrote: >>> And this happened first after updating Samba 4.16.6 to Samba 4.17.3 >>> via Debian >>> backports. >>> >> Is your OS a 32-bit version??? If so Michael updated Debian Backports >> with a fix for 32-bit systems >> using version 4.17.3.? If you have version 2:4.17.3_dfsg-1 it has the >> bug you describe for 32-bit systems. >> Look to update to version 2:4.17.3+dfsg-2 or 2:4.17.3 at dfsg-3 to fix >> this. >> >> HTH >> >> Roy >> >> > >
Rowland Penny
2022-Dec-08 09:45 UTC
[Samba] File server joined to a samba domain accessed by windows 10-11 clients, works via ip no via dns name
On 08/12/2022 09:22, Ingo Asche via samba wrote:> @Rowland: > > Just to be on the sure side I have checked DNS for the kerberos and ldap > entries from NAS side. > > nslookup -type=any _kerberos._udp.service.mydomain.de > Server:???????? 192.168.181.80 > Address:??????? 192.168.181.80#53 > > _kerberos._udp.service.mydomain.de????? service = 0 100 88 > dc1.service.mydomain.de. > _kerberos._udp.service.mydomain.de????? service = 0 100 88 > dc0.service.mydomain.de. > _kerberos._udp.service.mydomain.de????? service = 0 100 88 > dc2.service.mydomain.de. > > nslookup -type=any _ldap._tcp.service.mydomain.de > Server:???????? 192.168.181.80 > Address:??????? 192.168.181.80#53 > > _ldap._tcp.service.mydomain.de? service = 0 100 389 > dc0.service.mydomain.de. > _ldap._tcp.service.mydomain.de? service = 0 100 389 > dc2.service.mydomain.de. > _ldap._tcp.service.mydomain.de? service = 0 100 389 > dc1.service.mydomain.de. > > (I have to use nslookup, host command doesn't exist on Synology NAS) > > So I'm pretty sure DNS still works... >Then the finger seems to be pointing firmly at synology, everything works correctly for myself on Samba 4.17.3 Rowland