Hi Douglas,
Thanks for the help, and sorry for the delay. I've been away.
I've applied the patch, and the result is this:
Missing dn CN=DC01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name, from UTD vector for
dsa CN=DC11,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name
Missing dn CN=DC02,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name, from UTD vector for
dsa CN=DC11,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name
Missing dn CN=DC03,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name, from UTD vector for
dsa CN=DC11,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name
...
Missing dn CN=DC10,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name, from UTD vector for
dsa CN=DC11,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name
This DC11 is a Win2008R2 DC
BRGDS,
Bruno Guerreiro
From: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> on behalf of Douglas
Bagnall via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 1:26 AM
To: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: [Samba] Error in samba-tool drs updateness
EMAIL EXTERNO ? ORGANIZA??O
A abertura de mensagens de origem e/ou conte?do duvidoso poder? comprometer a
sua privacidade e a seguran?a dos dados a que acede. N?o aceda a liga??es
(links), nem abra anexos de remetentes desconhecidos. Nunca forne?a dados
pessoais associados ? sua conta.
hi Bruno,
If you apply the attached patch to samba/uptodateness.py, wherever that
might be on your system, it might tell you which DC is confused. (no
recompiling should be necessary).
On 7/07/22 06:49, Bruno Guerreiro via samba wrote:> Hi Rowland.
> Here's the full error:
>
> root at DC01:~# samba-tool drs uptodateness
From a `| sort | uniq -c`, it looks like 5 repetitions of 10 DCs, like this:
5 Missing dn CN=DC01,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,
5 Missing dn CN=DC02,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,
5 Missing dn CN=DC03,CN=Servers,CN=Porto,
5 Missing dn CN=DC04,CN=Servers,CN=Coimbra,
5 Missing dn CN=DC05,CN=Servers,CN=Evora,
5 Missing dn CN=DC06,CN=Servers,CN=Faro,
5 Missing dn CN=DC07,CN=Servers,CN=Funchal,
5 Missing dn CN=DC08,CN=Servers,CN=Lisboa,
5 Missing dn CN=DC09,CN=Servers,CN=Lisboa,
5 Missing dn CN=DC10,CN=Servers,CN=Angra,
5 repetitions because 5 partitions. Is there an 11th DC? Or one that was
not removed completely and/or not smoothly upgraded?
> DOMAIN maximum: 207 median: 18.0 failure: 10
> CONFIGURATION maximum: 468 median: 29.0 failure: 10
> SCHEMA maximum: 318 median: 27.0 failure: 10
> DNSDOMAIN maximum: 56 median: 3.0 failure: 10
> DNSFOREST maximum: 378 median: 36.0 failure: 10
I think I'd expect the max/median numbers to be lower here, unless the
network is very busy at the time -- or, of course, a DC that is failing to
replicate.
cheers,
Douglas
Confidencialidade: Esta mensagem (e eventuais ficheiros anexos) ? destinada
exclusivamente ?s pessoas nela indicadas e tem natureza confidencial. Se receber
esta mensagem por engano, por favor contacte o remetente e elimine a mensagem e
ficheiros, sem tomar conhecimento do respectivo conteudo e sem reproduzi-la ou
divulg?-la. Confidentiality Warning: This e-mail message (and any attached
files) is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed. lf you are not the intended recipient of this
message please notify the sender and delete and destroy all copies immediately.