Ok thanks.. i'll wait then....
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Mai 2022 09:55
> An: Dirk Laurenz <samba at laurenz.ws>
> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> Betreff: RE: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
>
> Hai Dirk
>
> * typed this yesterday, got call and forgot to send it. Sorry.
>
> Yes, there is a bug found in 4.16.1 in the packaging in debian for now,
revert to> 4.15.7 and wait untill its fixed.
>
> Its bug#1010922: samba-libs: linking against libraries in private dirs
without> RUNPATH
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010922
>
> Greetz,
>
> Louis
>
>
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: Dirk Laurenz
> > Verzonden: maandag 16 mei 2022 14:39
> > Aan: 'Dirk Laurenz' <samba at laurenz.ws>; 'L.P.H.
van Belle'
> > <belle at bazuin.nl>; samba at lists.samba.org
> > Onderwerp: AW: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> >
> > So after trying update, reinstallation, changing to a new sdcard... I
> > get the same errors, when starting samba with the backport version:
> >
> >
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:36.466993, 0]
> > ../../source4/samba/server.c:621(binary_smbd_main)
> > samba version 4.16.1-Debian started.
> > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2022
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:36.467540, 0]
> > ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:150(daemon_status)
> > daemon_status: daemon 'samba' : Starting process...
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.208800, 0]
> > ../../source4/samba/server.c:897(binary_smbd_main)
> > binary_smbd_main: samba: using 'prefork' process model
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.319717, 0]
> > ../../source4/lib/tls/tlscert.c:67(tls_cert_generate)
> > Attempting to autogenerate TLS self-signed keys for https for
> > hostname 'DC03.samba.laurenz.ws'
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557399, 0]
> > ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log)
> >
> > =========================================================> >
====> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557734, 0]
../../lib/util/fault.c:173(smb_panic_log)> > INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11: Segmentation fault in pid 24413
> > (4.16.1-Debian)
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557842, 0]
../../lib/util/fault.c:177(smb_panic_log)> > If you are running a recent Samba version, and if you think this
> > problem is not yet fixed in the latest versions, please consider
> > reporting this bug, see https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bug_Reporting
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557926, 0]
> > ../../lib/util/fault.c:182(smb_panic_log)
> >
> > =========================================================> >
====> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.558004, 0]
../../lib/util/fault.c:183(smb_panic_log)> > PANIC (pid 24413): Signal 11: Segmentation fault in 4.16.1-Debian
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.558571, 0]
../../lib/util/fault.c:287(log_stack_trace)> > BACKTRACE: 0 stack frames:
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.621827, 0]
> > ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log)
> >
> > =========================================================> >
====> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.624922, 0]
../../lib/util/fault.c:173(smb_panic_log)> > INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11: Segmentation fault in pid 24427
> > (4.16.1-Debian)
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.626360, 0]
../../lib/util/fault.c:177(smb_panic_log)> > If you are running a recent Samba version, and if you think this
> > problem is not yet fixed in the latest versions, please consider
> > reporting this bug, see https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bug_Reporting
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.627836, 0]
> > ../../lib/util/fault.c:182(smb_panic_log)
> >
> > =========================================================> >
====> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.629315, 0]
../../lib/util/fault.c:183(smb_panic_log)> > PANIC (pid 24427): Signal 11: Segmentation fault in 4.16.1-Debian
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.631621, 0]
../../lib/util/fault.c:287(log_stack_trace)> > BACKTRACE: 0 stack frames:
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.636204, 0]
> > ../../source4/samba/process_prefork.c:582(prefork_child_pipe_handler)
> > prefork_child_pipe_handler: Parent 24399, Child 24413 terminated
> > with signal 6
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.639824, 0]
> > ../../source4/samba/process_prefork.c:520(prefork_restart_fn)
> > prefork_restart_fn: Restarting [kdc] pre-fork worker(0)
> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.657836, 0]
> > ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log)
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag
von Dirk
> > Laurenz
> > > via samba
> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 16:13
> > > An: 'L.P.H. van Belle' <belle at bazuin.nl>; samba
at lists.samba.org
> > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> > >
> > > THanks a lot from me too
> > >
> > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im
Auftrag von L.P.H.
> > van
> > > > Belle via samba
> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 15:21
> > > > An: samba at lists.samba.org
> > > > Cc: Dirk Laurenz <samba at laurenz.ws>
> > > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> > > >
> > > > Hi Dirk
> > > >
> > > > > If i understand your right, using backports is an
alternative?
> > > > That?s possible now, correct.
> > > >
> > > > Well, before Micheal, there was not debian-backports samba..
> > > > I wanted todo that, but that was a to big job for me.
> > > > Micheal worked his ass of to get it this far.
> > > > An amazing job he did, I followed all changes closely.
> > > > Which is also why I didn?t release any 4.16.x packages yet.
> > > >
> > > > As soon the freeze is in for wormbook ( debian 12) we cant
update
> > > > samba anymore in debian for new stable.
> > > > Micheal made sure at least 4.16.x gets in.
> > > > He fixed a lot already.
> > > >
> > > > I will be provinding higher samba version to Debian Stable
where
needed.> > > > I will be doing the lower current versions also conform
samba
schedule.> > > >
> > > > So thanks to all effort of him, now you can step in also on
> > > debian-backports
> > > > Unless, you use profiling-data or Spotlight with Gnome
Tracker
Backend.> > > > then you must use my packages.
> > > >
> > > > Samba on Debian got way way better thanks to Michael, and I
fully
> > > > rely on
> > > the
> > > > maintainers so, all he did, will get adopted in mine.
> > > > but only as of 4.16, im not backporting all his changes..
> > > > way to much work. (* sorry)
> > > >
> > > > and please to read the change logs, before you install them.
> > > > https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.16.0.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Greetz,
> > > >
> > > > Louis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba
> > > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 14:32
> > > > > Aan: belle at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org
> > > > > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> > > > >
> > > > > If i understand your right, using backports is an
alternative?
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at
lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L.
> > > > > > van Belle via samba
> > > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36
> > > > > > An: samba at lists.samba.org
> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hai Dirk,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can you give me a output of both servers.
> > > > > > dpkg -l | grep -E
"samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient "
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think I see where this is coming from, im
already adressing
> > > > > > this in
> > > > > newer
> > > > > > version.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1
> > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > S is higher that L
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Quick fix, remove samba and install it again..
> > > > > > Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options.
> > > > > > All data and configs will stay as is..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The new format will be for the 4.16 line.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1 < not sure if i
will build
these.> > > > > > Reason for that is, there are things enabled that
are not
> > > > > > supported on
> > > > > buster.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1
> > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1 < not sure
if i will build
> > > these,
> > > > > > same reason as above but for focal.
> > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if you want sooner to 4.16.1
> > > > > > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye-
> > > > > > backports&arch=any&searcho
> > > > > > n=names&keywords=samba
> > > > > > Micheal (new samba debian maintainer) provided
already a
backport.> > > > > >
> > > > > > so what's the difference compaired to mine and
the
> > > > > > debian-backports, not much anymore.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > last changelog.
> > > > > > samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye;
urgency=medium
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Non-maintainer upload.
> > > > > > * Rebuild from bullseye-backports.
> > > > > > Please don't forget to enable Debian
Backports for needed
> > depends
> > > > > > * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter
> > > > > > * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build
depend
> > > > > > This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome
Tracker
Backend.> > > > > > Info
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Back
> > > > > en
> > > > > d
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl>
Mon, 09 May 2022
> > > > > > 10:59:16
> > > > > > +0200
> > > > > >
> > > > > > im not done with testing them, but if all goes as
expected,
> > > > > > these will be
> > > > > online
> > > > > > this week.
> > > > > > At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PS. Small side note,
> > > > > > just got a message from Michael, that the current
backported
> > > > > > samba does
> > > > > not
> > > > > > support SSSD yet.
> > > > > > fix soon, see debian bug #1010801
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Greetz,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Louis
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > > > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba
> > > > > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39
> > > > > > > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at
lists.samba.org>
> > > > > > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye
and changed all
> > > > > sources.list
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > bullseye.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the
contents of
> > > van-belle.list:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > root at dc02:~# cat
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > # AptVanBelle repo for samba.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #deb [arch=armhf
> > > > > > >
signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg]
> > > > > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/
buster-samba415 main
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > deb [arch=armhf
> > > > > > >
signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg]
> > > > > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/
bullseye-samba415 main
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So far everything went well, but apt
uninstalled samba while
> > > upgrading.
> > > > > > > When I now want to reinstall I get this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude update
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian
buster-samba415
> > > > > > > InRelease
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Treffer
http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye
> > > > > > > InRelease
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian
bullseye
> > > > > > > InRelease
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian
bullseye-samba415
> > > > > > > InRelease
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Treffer
> > > > > > >
https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest
> > > > > > > bullseye InRelease
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ign
https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge
> > > > > InRelease
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Treffer
https://download.webmin.com/download/repository
> > > > > > > sarge Release
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Abh?ngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet?
Fertig
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu
entfernen und 0
> > > > > > > nicht
> > > > > > aktualisiert.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zus?tzlich
installiert:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a}
> > > > > > > python3-cffi-backend{a}
> > > > > > > python3- cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a}
python3-
> > > > markdown{a}
> > > > > > > python3- pygments{a}
python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b}
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a}
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zus?tzlich
installiert, 0 werden
> > > > > > > entfernt und
> > > > > 0
> > > > > > nicht
> > > > > > > aktualisiert.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven m?ssen
heruntergeladen werden.
> > > > > > > Nach dem Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zus?tzlich
belegt sein.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte
Abh?ngigkeiten:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > samba : H?ngt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but
3.9.2-3 is
> > > > > > > installed
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: python3-samba ist aber
nicht
> > > > > > > installationsf?hig
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-common-bin (>
> > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist
> > > > > > aber
> > > > > > > nicht installationsf?hig
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: libpython3.7 (>=
3.7.0) which is a
> > > > > > > virtual
> > > > > package
> > > > > > and is not
> > > > > > > provided by any available package
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-libs (> >
> > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist aber
> > > > > > nicht
> > > > > > > installationsf?hig
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why is samba requesting buster packages
although I provide
> > > > > > > the bullseye repo (samba at the moment same
version)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in
ihrer aktuellen
Version:> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) samba [Nicht installiert]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the
following URL and
> > > > > > > read the
> > > > > > > instructions:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following
URL and read
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > instructions:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
and read
> > > > > the
> > > > > instructions:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
read the
> > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
the
> > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>