THanks a lot from me too> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L.P.H. van > Belle via samba > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 15:21 > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Cc: Dirk Laurenz <samba at laurenz.ws> > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > Hi Dirk > > > If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative? > That?s possible now, correct. > > Well, before Micheal, there was not debian-backports samba.. > I wanted todo that, but that was a to big job for me. > Micheal worked his ass of to get it this far. > An amazing job he did, I followed all changes closely. > Which is also why I didn?t release any 4.16.x packages yet. > > As soon the freeze is in for wormbook ( debian 12) we cant update samba > anymore in debian for new stable. > Micheal made sure at least 4.16.x gets in. > He fixed a lot already. > > I will be provinding higher samba version to Debian Stable where needed. > I will be doing the lower current versions also conform samba schedule. > > So thanks to all effort of him, now you can step in also ondebian-backports> Unless, you use profiling-data or Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. > then you must use my packages. > > Samba on Debian got way way better thanks to Michael, and I fully rely onthe> maintainers so, all he did, will get adopted in mine. > but only as of 4.16, im not backporting all his changes.. > way to much work. (* sorry) > > and please to read the change logs, before you install them. > https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.16.0.html > > > Greetz, > > Louis > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 14:32 > > Aan: belle at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org > > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative? > > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L. van > > > Belle via samba > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36 > > > An: samba at lists.samba.org > > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > Hai Dirk, > > > > > > Can you give me a output of both servers. > > > dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient " > > > > > > I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing this > > > in > > newer > > > version. > > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1 > > > > > > S is higher that L > > > > > > Quick fix, remove samba and install it again.. > > > Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options. > > > All data and configs will stay as is.. > > > > > > The new format will be for the 4.16 line. > > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1 < not sure if i will build these. > > > Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not supported > > > on > > buster. > > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1 > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1 < not sure if i will buildthese,> > > same reason as above but for focal. > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1 > > > > > > The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+ > > > > > > if you want sooner to 4.16.1 > > > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye- > > > backports&arch=any&searcho > > > n=names&keywords=samba > > > Micheal (new samba debian maintainer) provided already a backport. > > > > > > so what's the difference compaired to mine and the debian-backports, > > > not much anymore. > > > > > > last changelog. > > > samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium > > > > > > * Non-maintainer upload. > > > * Rebuild from bullseye-backports. > > > Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for needed depends > > > * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter > > > * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend > > > This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. > > > Info > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backend > > > > > > -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl> Mon, 09 May 2022 10:59:16 > > > +0200 > > > > > > im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, these > > > will be > > online > > > this week. > > > At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now. > > > > > > PS. Small side note, > > > just got a message from Michael, that the current backported samba > > > does > > not > > > support SSSD yet. > > > fix soon, see debian bug #1010801 > > > > > > > > > Greetz, > > > > > > Louis > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39 > > > > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org> > > > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed all > > sources.list > > > to > > > > bullseye. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents ofvan-belle.list:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list > > > > > > > > # AptVanBelle repo for samba. > > > > > > > > #deb [arch=armhf > > > > signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main > > > > > > > > deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba whileupgrading.> > > > When I now want to reinstall I get this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude update > > > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 InRelease > > > > > > > > Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye InRelease > > > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 InRelease > > > > > > > > Treffer https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest > > > > bullseye InRelease > > > > > > > > Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge > > InRelease > > > > > > > > Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge > > > > Release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade > > > > > > > > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig > > > > > > > > Abh?ngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig > > > > > > > > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig > > > > > > > > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig > > > > > > > > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht > > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba > > > > > > > > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zus?tzlich installiert: > > > > > > > > acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} python3-cffi-backend{a} > > > > python3- cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3- > markdown{a} > > > > python3- pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b} > > > > > > > > samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a} > > > > > > > > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zus?tzlich installiert, 0 werden > > > > entfernt und > > 0 > > > nicht > > > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > > > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven m?ssen heruntergeladen werden. Nach > > > > dem Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zus?tzlich belegt sein. > > > > > > > > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abh?ngigkeiten: > > > > > > > > samba : H?ngt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is installed > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht > > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-common-bin (> > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist > > > aber > > > > nicht installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a virtual > > package > > > and is not > > > > provided by any available package > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-libs (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist > > > > aber > > > nicht > > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide the > > > > bullseye repo (samba at the moment same version) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version: > > > > > > > > 1) samba [Nicht installiert] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
So after trying update, reinstallation, changing to a new sdcard... I get the same errors, when starting samba with the backport version: [2022/05/16 14:34:36.466993, 0] ../../source4/samba/server.c:621(binary_smbd_main) samba version 4.16.1-Debian started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2022 [2022/05/16 14:34:36.467540, 0] ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:150(daemon_status) daemon_status: daemon 'samba' : Starting process... [2022/05/16 14:34:37.208800, 0] ../../source4/samba/server.c:897(binary_smbd_main) binary_smbd_main: samba: using 'prefork' process model [2022/05/16 14:34:37.319717, 0] ../../source4/lib/tls/tlscert.c:67(tls_cert_generate) Attempting to autogenerate TLS self-signed keys for https for hostname 'DC03.samba.laurenz.ws' [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557399, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log) ==============================================================[2022/05/16 14:34:37.557734, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:173(smb_panic_log) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11: Segmentation fault in pid 24413 (4.16.1-Debian) [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557842, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:177(smb_panic_log) If you are running a recent Samba version, and if you think this problem is not yet fixed in the latest versions, please consider reporting this bug, see https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bug_Reporting [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557926, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:182(smb_panic_log) ==============================================================[2022/05/16 14:34:37.558004, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:183(smb_panic_log) PANIC (pid 24413): Signal 11: Segmentation fault in 4.16.1-Debian [2022/05/16 14:34:37.558571, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:287(log_stack_trace) BACKTRACE: 0 stack frames: [2022/05/16 14:34:37.621827, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log) ==============================================================[2022/05/16 14:34:37.624922, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:173(smb_panic_log) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11: Segmentation fault in pid 24427 (4.16.1-Debian) [2022/05/16 14:34:37.626360, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:177(smb_panic_log) If you are running a recent Samba version, and if you think this problem is not yet fixed in the latest versions, please consider reporting this bug, see https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bug_Reporting [2022/05/16 14:34:37.627836, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:182(smb_panic_log) ==============================================================[2022/05/16 14:34:37.629315, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:183(smb_panic_log) PANIC (pid 24427): Signal 11: Segmentation fault in 4.16.1-Debian [2022/05/16 14:34:37.631621, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:287(log_stack_trace) BACKTRACE: 0 stack frames: [2022/05/16 14:34:37.636204, 0] ../../source4/samba/process_prefork.c:582(prefork_child_pipe_handler) prefork_child_pipe_handler: Parent 24399, Child 24413 terminated with signal 6 [2022/05/16 14:34:37.639824, 0] ../../source4/samba/process_prefork.c:520(prefork_restart_fn) prefork_restart_fn: Restarting [kdc] pre-fork worker(0) [2022/05/16 14:34:37.657836, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log)> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Dirk Laurenz > via samba > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 16:13 > An: 'L.P.H. van Belle' <belle at bazuin.nl>; samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > THanks a lot from me too > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L.P.H. van > > Belle via samba > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 15:21 > > An: samba at lists.samba.org > > Cc: Dirk Laurenz <samba at laurenz.ws> > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > Hi Dirk > > > > > If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative? > > That?s possible now, correct. > > > > Well, before Micheal, there was not debian-backports samba.. > > I wanted todo that, but that was a to big job for me. > > Micheal worked his ass of to get it this far. > > An amazing job he did, I followed all changes closely. > > Which is also why I didn?t release any 4.16.x packages yet. > > > > As soon the freeze is in for wormbook ( debian 12) we cant update > > samba anymore in debian for new stable. > > Micheal made sure at least 4.16.x gets in. > > He fixed a lot already. > > > > I will be provinding higher samba version to Debian Stable where needed. > > I will be doing the lower current versions also conform samba schedule. > > > > So thanks to all effort of him, now you can step in also on > debian-backports > > Unless, you use profiling-data or Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. > > then you must use my packages. > > > > Samba on Debian got way way better thanks to Michael, and I fully rely > > on > the > > maintainers so, all he did, will get adopted in mine. > > but only as of 4.16, im not backporting all his changes.. > > way to much work. (* sorry) > > > > and please to read the change logs, before you install them. > > https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.16.0.html > > > > > > Greetz, > > > > Louis > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 14:32 > > > Aan: belle at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org > > > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative? > > > > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L. van > > > > Belle via samba > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36 > > > > An: samba at lists.samba.org > > > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > > > Hai Dirk, > > > > > > > > Can you give me a output of both servers. > > > > dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient " > > > > > > > > I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing this > > > > in > > > newer > > > > version. > > > > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1 > > > > > > > > S is higher that L > > > > > > > > Quick fix, remove samba and install it again.. > > > > Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options. > > > > All data and configs will stay as is.. > > > > > > > > The new format will be for the 4.16 line. > > > > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1 < not sure if i will build these. > > > > Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not > > > > supported on > > > buster. > > > > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1 > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1 < not sure if i will build > these, > > > > same reason as above but for focal. > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1 > > > > > > > > The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+ > > > > > > > > if you want sooner to 4.16.1 > > > > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye- > > > > backports&arch=any&searcho > > > > n=names&keywords=samba > > > > Micheal (new samba debian maintainer) provided already a backport. > > > > > > > > so what's the difference compaired to mine and the > > > > debian-backports, not much anymore. > > > > > > > > last changelog. > > > > samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium > > > > > > > > * Non-maintainer upload. > > > > * Rebuild from bullseye-backports. > > > > Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for neededdepends> > > > * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter > > > > * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend > > > > This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. > > > > Info > > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backen > > > d > > > > > > > > -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl> Mon, 09 May 2022 > > > > 10:59:16 > > > > +0200 > > > > > > > > im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, these > > > > will be > > > online > > > > this week. > > > > At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now. > > > > > > > > PS. Small side note, > > > > just got a message from Michael, that the current backported samba > > > > does > > > not > > > > support SSSD yet. > > > > fix soon, see debian bug #1010801 > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetz, > > > > > > > > Louis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39 > > > > > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org> > > > > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed all > > > sources.list > > > > to > > > > > bullseye. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents of > van-belle.list: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list > > > > > > > > > > # AptVanBelle repo for samba. > > > > > > > > > > #deb [arch=armhf > > > > > signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main > > > > > > > > > > deb [arch=armhf > > > > > signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba while > upgrading. > > > > > When I now want to reinstall I get this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude update > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 InRelease > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye > > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye InRelease > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 > > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > Treffer https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest > > > > > bullseye InRelease > > > > > > > > > > Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge > > > > > Release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade > > > > > > > > > > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > Abh?ngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht > > > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba > > > > > > > > > > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zus?tzlich installiert: > > > > > > > > > > acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} python3-cffi-backend{a} > > > > > python3- cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3- > > markdown{a} > > > > > python3- pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b} > > > > > > > > > > samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a} > > > > > > > > > > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zus?tzlich installiert, 0 werden > > > > > entfernt und > > > 0 > > > > nicht > > > > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > > > > > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven m?ssen heruntergeladen werden. > > > > > Nach dem Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zus?tzlich belegt sein. > > > > > > > > > > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abh?ngigkeiten: > > > > > > > > > > samba : H?ngt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is installed > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht > > > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-common-bin (> > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist > > > > aber > > > > > nicht installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a > > > > > virtual > > > package > > > > and is not > > > > > provided by any available package > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-libs (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) > > > > > ist aber > > > > nicht > > > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide the > > > > > bullseye repo (samba at the moment same version) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version: > > > > > > > > > > 1) samba [Nicht installiert] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read > > > > > the > > > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hai Dirk * typed this yesterday, got call and forgot to send it. Sorry. Yes, there is a bug found in 4.16.1 in the packaging in debian for now, revert to 4.15.7 and wait untill its fixed. Its bug#1010922: samba-libs: linking against libraries in private dirs without RUNPATH https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010922 Greetz, Louis> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Dirk Laurenz > Verzonden: maandag 16 mei 2022 14:39 > Aan: 'Dirk Laurenz' <samba at laurenz.ws>; 'L.P.H. van Belle' > <belle at bazuin.nl>; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: AW: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > So after trying update, reinstallation, changing to a new sdcard... I get the > same errors, when starting samba with the backport version: > > > [2022/05/16 14:34:36.466993, 0] > ../../source4/samba/server.c:621(binary_smbd_main) > samba version 4.16.1-Debian started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2022 > [2022/05/16 14:34:36.467540, 0] > ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:150(daemon_status) > daemon_status: daemon 'samba' : Starting process... > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.208800, 0] > ../../source4/samba/server.c:897(binary_smbd_main) > binary_smbd_main: samba: using 'prefork' process model > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.319717, 0] > ../../source4/lib/tls/tlscert.c:67(tls_cert_generate) > Attempting to autogenerate TLS self-signed keys for https for hostname > 'DC03.samba.laurenz.ws' > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557399, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log) > > =========================================================> ====> [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557734, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:173(smb_panic_log) > INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11: Segmentation fault in pid 24413 (4.16.1-Debian) > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557842, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:177(smb_panic_log) > If you are running a recent Samba version, and if you think this problem is > not yet fixed in the latest versions, please consider reporting this bug, see > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bug_Reporting > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557926, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:182(smb_panic_log) > > =========================================================> ====> [2022/05/16 14:34:37.558004, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:183(smb_panic_log) > PANIC (pid 24413): Signal 11: Segmentation fault in 4.16.1-Debian > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.558571, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:287(log_stack_trace) > BACKTRACE: 0 stack frames: > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.621827, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log) > > =========================================================> ====> [2022/05/16 14:34:37.624922, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:173(smb_panic_log) > INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11: Segmentation fault in pid 24427 (4.16.1-Debian) > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.626360, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:177(smb_panic_log) > If you are running a recent Samba version, and if you think this problem is > not yet fixed in the latest versions, please consider reporting this bug, see > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bug_Reporting > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.627836, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:182(smb_panic_log) > > =========================================================> ====> [2022/05/16 14:34:37.629315, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:183(smb_panic_log) > PANIC (pid 24427): Signal 11: Segmentation fault in 4.16.1-Debian > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.631621, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:287(log_stack_trace) > BACKTRACE: 0 stack frames: > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.636204, 0] > ../../source4/samba/process_prefork.c:582(prefork_child_pipe_handler) > prefork_child_pipe_handler: Parent 24399, Child 24413 terminated with > signal 6 > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.639824, 0] > ../../source4/samba/process_prefork.c:520(prefork_restart_fn) > prefork_restart_fn: Restarting [kdc] pre-fork worker(0) > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.657836, 0] ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log) > > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Dirk > Laurenz > > via samba > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 16:13 > > An: 'L.P.H. van Belle' <belle at bazuin.nl>; samba at lists.samba.org > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > THanks a lot from me too > > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L.P.H. > van > > > Belle via samba > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 15:21 > > > An: samba at lists.samba.org > > > Cc: Dirk Laurenz <samba at laurenz.ws> > > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > Hi Dirk > > > > > > > If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative? > > > That?s possible now, correct. > > > > > > Well, before Micheal, there was not debian-backports samba.. > > > I wanted todo that, but that was a to big job for me. > > > Micheal worked his ass of to get it this far. > > > An amazing job he did, I followed all changes closely. > > > Which is also why I didn?t release any 4.16.x packages yet. > > > > > > As soon the freeze is in for wormbook ( debian 12) we cant update > > > samba anymore in debian for new stable. > > > Micheal made sure at least 4.16.x gets in. > > > He fixed a lot already. > > > > > > I will be provinding higher samba version to Debian Stable where needed. > > > I will be doing the lower current versions also conform samba schedule. > > > > > > So thanks to all effort of him, now you can step in also on > > debian-backports > > > Unless, you use profiling-data or Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. > > > then you must use my packages. > > > > > > Samba on Debian got way way better thanks to Michael, and I fully > > > rely on > > the > > > maintainers so, all he did, will get adopted in mine. > > > but only as of 4.16, im not backporting all his changes.. > > > way to much work. (* sorry) > > > > > > and please to read the change logs, before you install them. > > > https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.16.0.html > > > > > > > > > Greetz, > > > > > > Louis > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 14:32 > > > > Aan: belle at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org > > > > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > > > If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative? > > > > > > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > > > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L. van > > > > > Belle via samba > > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36 > > > > > An: samba at lists.samba.org > > > > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > > > > > Hai Dirk, > > > > > > > > > > Can you give me a output of both servers. > > > > > dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient " > > > > > > > > > > I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing > > > > > this in > > > > newer > > > > > version. > > > > > > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1 > > > > > > > > > > S is higher that L > > > > > > > > > > Quick fix, remove samba and install it again.. > > > > > Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options. > > > > > All data and configs will stay as is.. > > > > > > > > > > The new format will be for the 4.16 line. > > > > > > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1 < not sure if i will build these. > > > > > Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not > > > > > supported on > > > > buster. > > > > > > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1 > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1 < not sure if i will build > > these, > > > > > same reason as above but for focal. > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1 > > > > > > > > > > The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+ > > > > > > > > > > if you want sooner to 4.16.1 > > > > > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye- > > > > > backports&arch=any&searcho > > > > > n=names&keywords=samba > > > > > Micheal (new samba debian maintainer) provided already a backport. > > > > > > > > > > so what's the difference compaired to mine and the > > > > > debian-backports, not much anymore. > > > > > > > > > > last changelog. > > > > > samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium > > > > > > > > > > * Non-maintainer upload. > > > > > * Rebuild from bullseye-backports. > > > > > Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for needed > depends > > > > > * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter > > > > > * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend > > > > > This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. > > > > > Info > > > > > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Back > > > > en > > > > d > > > > > > > > > > -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl> Mon, 09 May 2022 > > > > > 10:59:16 > > > > > +0200 > > > > > > > > > > im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, > > > > > these will be > > > > online > > > > > this week. > > > > > At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now. > > > > > > > > > > PS. Small side note, > > > > > just got a message from Michael, that the current backported > > > > > samba does > > > > not > > > > > support SSSD yet. > > > > > fix soon, see debian bug #1010801 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetz, > > > > > > > > > > Louis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > > > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39 > > > > > > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org> > > > > > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed all > > > > sources.list > > > > > to > > > > > > bullseye. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents of > > van-belle.list: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list > > > > > > > > > > > > # AptVanBelle repo for samba. > > > > > > > > > > > > #deb [arch=armhf > > > > > > signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main > > > > > > > > > > > > deb [arch=armhf > > > > > > signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba while > > upgrading. > > > > > > When I now want to reinstall I get this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude update > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 > > > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye > > > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye > > > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 > > > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest > > > > > > bullseye InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge > > > > > > Release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade > > > > > > > > > > > > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > > > Abh?ngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > > > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > > > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > > > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht > > > > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba > > > > > > > > > > > > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zus?tzlich installiert: > > > > > > > > > > > > acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} python3-cffi-backend{a} > > > > > > python3- cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3- > > > markdown{a} > > > > > > python3- pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b} > > > > > > > > > > > > samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a} > > > > > > > > > > > > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zus?tzlich installiert, 0 werden > > > > > > entfernt und > > > > 0 > > > > > nicht > > > > > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven m?ssen heruntergeladen werden. > > > > > > Nach dem Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zus?tzlich belegt sein. > > > > > > > > > > > > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abh?ngigkeiten: > > > > > > > > > > > > samba : H?ngt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is installed > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht > > > > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-common-bin (> > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist > > > > > aber > > > > > > nicht installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a > > > > > > virtual > > > > package > > > > > and is not > > > > > > provided by any available package > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-libs (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) > > > > > > ist aber > > > > > nicht > > > > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide the > > > > > > bullseye repo (samba at the moment same version) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) samba [Nicht installiert] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read > > > > > > the > > > > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read > > > > > the > > > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Ok thanks.. i'll wait then....> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Mai 2022 09:55 > An: Dirk Laurenz <samba at laurenz.ws> > Cc: samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: RE: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > Hai Dirk > > * typed this yesterday, got call and forgot to send it. Sorry. > > Yes, there is a bug found in 4.16.1 in the packaging in debian for now,revert to> 4.15.7 and wait untill its fixed. > > Its bug#1010922: samba-libs: linking against libraries in private dirswithout> RUNPATH > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010922 > > Greetz, > > Louis > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: Dirk Laurenz > > Verzonden: maandag 16 mei 2022 14:39 > > Aan: 'Dirk Laurenz' <samba at laurenz.ws>; 'L.P.H. van Belle' > > <belle at bazuin.nl>; samba at lists.samba.org > > Onderwerp: AW: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > So after trying update, reinstallation, changing to a new sdcard... I > > get the same errors, when starting samba with the backport version: > > > > > > [2022/05/16 14:34:36.466993, 0] > > ../../source4/samba/server.c:621(binary_smbd_main) > > samba version 4.16.1-Debian started. > > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2022 > > [2022/05/16 14:34:36.467540, 0] > > ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:150(daemon_status) > > daemon_status: daemon 'samba' : Starting process... > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.208800, 0] > > ../../source4/samba/server.c:897(binary_smbd_main) > > binary_smbd_main: samba: using 'prefork' process model > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.319717, 0] > > ../../source4/lib/tls/tlscert.c:67(tls_cert_generate) > > Attempting to autogenerate TLS self-signed keys for https for > > hostname 'DC03.samba.laurenz.ws' > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557399, 0] > > ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log) > > > > =========================================================> > ====> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557734, 0]../../lib/util/fault.c:173(smb_panic_log)> > INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11: Segmentation fault in pid 24413 > > (4.16.1-Debian) > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557842, 0]../../lib/util/fault.c:177(smb_panic_log)> > If you are running a recent Samba version, and if you think this > > problem is not yet fixed in the latest versions, please consider > > reporting this bug, see https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bug_Reporting > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.557926, 0] > > ../../lib/util/fault.c:182(smb_panic_log) > > > > =========================================================> > ====> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.558004, 0]../../lib/util/fault.c:183(smb_panic_log)> > PANIC (pid 24413): Signal 11: Segmentation fault in 4.16.1-Debian > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.558571, 0]../../lib/util/fault.c:287(log_stack_trace)> > BACKTRACE: 0 stack frames: > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.621827, 0] > > ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log) > > > > =========================================================> > ====> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.624922, 0]../../lib/util/fault.c:173(smb_panic_log)> > INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11: Segmentation fault in pid 24427 > > (4.16.1-Debian) > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.626360, 0]../../lib/util/fault.c:177(smb_panic_log)> > If you are running a recent Samba version, and if you think this > > problem is not yet fixed in the latest versions, please consider > > reporting this bug, see https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bug_Reporting > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.627836, 0] > > ../../lib/util/fault.c:182(smb_panic_log) > > > > =========================================================> > ====> > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.629315, 0]../../lib/util/fault.c:183(smb_panic_log)> > PANIC (pid 24427): Signal 11: Segmentation fault in 4.16.1-Debian > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.631621, 0]../../lib/util/fault.c:287(log_stack_trace)> > BACKTRACE: 0 stack frames: > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.636204, 0] > > ../../source4/samba/process_prefork.c:582(prefork_child_pipe_handler) > > prefork_child_pipe_handler: Parent 24399, Child 24413 terminated > > with signal 6 > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.639824, 0] > > ../../source4/samba/process_prefork.c:520(prefork_restart_fn) > > prefork_restart_fn: Restarting [kdc] pre-fork worker(0) > > [2022/05/16 14:34:37.657836, 0] > > ../../lib/util/fault.c:172(smb_panic_log) > > > > > > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von Dirk > > Laurenz > > > via samba > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 16:13 > > > An: 'L.P.H. van Belle' <belle at bazuin.nl>; samba at lists.samba.org > > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > THanks a lot from me too > > > > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L.P.H. > > van > > > > Belle via samba > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 15:21 > > > > An: samba at lists.samba.org > > > > Cc: Dirk Laurenz <samba at laurenz.ws> > > > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > > > Hi Dirk > > > > > > > > > If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative? > > > > That?s possible now, correct. > > > > > > > > Well, before Micheal, there was not debian-backports samba.. > > > > I wanted todo that, but that was a to big job for me. > > > > Micheal worked his ass of to get it this far. > > > > An amazing job he did, I followed all changes closely. > > > > Which is also why I didn?t release any 4.16.x packages yet. > > > > > > > > As soon the freeze is in for wormbook ( debian 12) we cant update > > > > samba anymore in debian for new stable. > > > > Micheal made sure at least 4.16.x gets in. > > > > He fixed a lot already. > > > > > > > > I will be provinding higher samba version to Debian Stable whereneeded.> > > > I will be doing the lower current versions also conform sambaschedule.> > > > > > > > So thanks to all effort of him, now you can step in also on > > > debian-backports > > > > Unless, you use profiling-data or Spotlight with Gnome TrackerBackend.> > > > then you must use my packages. > > > > > > > > Samba on Debian got way way better thanks to Michael, and I fully > > > > rely on > > > the > > > > maintainers so, all he did, will get adopted in mine. > > > > but only as of 4.16, im not backporting all his changes.. > > > > way to much work. (* sorry) > > > > > > > > and please to read the change logs, before you install them. > > > > https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.16.0.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetz, > > > > > > > > Louis > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 14:32 > > > > > Aan: belle at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org > > > > > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > > > > > If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative? > > > > > > > > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > > > > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L. > > > > > > van Belle via samba > > > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36 > > > > > > An: samba at lists.samba.org > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > > > > > > > Hai Dirk, > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you give me a output of both servers. > > > > > > dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient " > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing > > > > > > this in > > > > > newer > > > > > > version. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1 > > > > > > > > > > > > S is higher that L > > > > > > > > > > > > Quick fix, remove samba and install it again.. > > > > > > Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options. > > > > > > All data and configs will stay as is.. > > > > > > > > > > > > The new format will be for the 4.16 line. > > > > > > > > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1 < not sure if i will buildthese.> > > > > > Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not > > > > > > supported on > > > > > buster. > > > > > > > > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1 > > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1 < not sure if i will build > > > these, > > > > > > same reason as above but for focal. > > > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1 > > > > > > > > > > > > The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+ > > > > > > > > > > > > if you want sooner to 4.16.1 > > > > > > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye- > > > > > > backports&arch=any&searcho > > > > > > n=names&keywords=samba > > > > > > Micheal (new samba debian maintainer) provided already abackport.> > > > > > > > > > > > so what's the difference compaired to mine and the > > > > > > debian-backports, not much anymore. > > > > > > > > > > > > last changelog. > > > > > > samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium > > > > > > > > > > > > * Non-maintainer upload. > > > > > > * Rebuild from bullseye-backports. > > > > > > Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for needed > > depends > > > > > > * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter > > > > > > * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend > > > > > > This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome TrackerBackend.> > > > > > Info > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Back > > > > > en > > > > > d > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl> Mon, 09 May 2022 > > > > > > 10:59:16 > > > > > > +0200 > > > > > > > > > > > > im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, > > > > > > these will be > > > > > online > > > > > > this week. > > > > > > At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now. > > > > > > > > > > > > PS. Small side note, > > > > > > just got a message from Michael, that the current backported > > > > > > samba does > > > > > not > > > > > > support SSSD yet. > > > > > > fix soon, see debian bug #1010801 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetz, > > > > > > > > > > > > Louis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > > > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > > > > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39 > > > > > > > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org> > > > > > > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed all > > > > > sources.list > > > > > > to > > > > > > > bullseye. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents of > > > van-belle.list: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > # AptVanBelle repo for samba. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > #deb [arch=armhf > > > > > > > signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > > > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deb [arch=armhf > > > > > > > signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > > > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba while > > > upgrading. > > > > > > > When I now want to reinstall I get this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude update > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 > > > > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye > > > > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye > > > > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 > > > > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer > > > > > > > https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest > > > > > > > bullseye InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge > > > > > InRelease > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository > > > > > > > sarge Release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Abh?ngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 > > > > > > > nicht > > > > > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zus?tzlich installiert: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} > > > > > > > python3-cffi-backend{a} > > > > > > > python3- cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3- > > > > markdown{a} > > > > > > > python3- pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b} > > > > > > > > > > > > > > samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a} > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zus?tzlich installiert, 0 werden > > > > > > > entfernt und > > > > > 0 > > > > > > nicht > > > > > > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven m?ssen heruntergeladen werden. > > > > > > > Nach dem Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zus?tzlich belegt sein. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abh?ngigkeiten: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > samba : H?ngt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is > > > > > > > installed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht > > > > > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-common-bin (> > > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist > > > > > > aber > > > > > > > nicht installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a > > > > > > > virtual > > > > > package > > > > > > and is not > > > > > > > provided by any available package > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-libs (> > > > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist aber > > > > > > nicht > > > > > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide > > > > > > > the bullseye repo (samba at the moment same version) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellenVersion:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) samba [Nicht installiert] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and > > > > > > > read the > > > > > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read > > > > > > the > > > > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read > > > > > the > > > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba >