Hai Dirk,
Can you give me a output of both servers.
dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient "
I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing this in newer
version.
2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1
2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1
S is higher that L
Quick fix, remove samba and install it again..
Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options.
All data and configs will stay as is..
The new format will be for the 4.16 line.
samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1 < not sure if i will build these.
Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not supported on
buster.
samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1
samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1 < not sure if i will build these,
same reason as above but for focal.
samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1
The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+
if you want sooner to 4.16.1
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye-backports&arch=any&searcho
n=names&keywords=samba
Micheal (new samba debian maintainer) provided already a backport.
so what's the difference compaired to mine and the debian-backports, not
much anymore.
last changelog.
samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Rebuild from bullseye-backports.
Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for needed depends
* d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter
* d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend
This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend.
Info
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backend
-- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl> Mon, 09 May 2022 10:59:16
+0200
im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, these will be
online this week.
At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now.
PS. Small side note,
just got a message from Michael, that the current backported samba does not
support SSSD yet.
fix soon, see debian bug #1010801
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba
> Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39
> Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org>
> Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies?
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed all sources.list
to> bullseye.
>
>
>
> Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents of van-belle.list:
>
>
>
> root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list
>
> # AptVanBelle repo for samba.
>
> #deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg]
> http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main
>
> deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg]
> http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main
>
>
>
> So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba while upgrading.
> When I now want to reinstall I get this.
>
>
>
> root at dc02:~# aptitude update
>
> Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 InRelease
>
> Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye InRelease
>
> Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye InRelease
>
> Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 InRelease
>
> Treffer https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest bullseye
> InRelease
>
> Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge InRelease
>
> Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge Release
>
>
>
> root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade
>
> Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig
>
> Abh?ngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig
>
> Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig
>
> Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig
>
> 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht
aktualisiert.>
> root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba
>
> Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zus?tzlich installiert:
>
> acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} python3-cffi-backend{a} python3-
> cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3-markdown{a} python3-
> pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b}
>
> samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a}
>
> 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zus?tzlich installiert, 0 werden entfernt und 0
nicht> aktualisiert.
>
> 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven m?ssen heruntergeladen werden. Nach dem
> Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zus?tzlich belegt sein.
>
> Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abh?ngigkeiten:
>
> samba : H?ngt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is installed
>
> H?ngt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht installationsf?hig
>
> H?ngt ab von: samba-common-bin (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist
aber> nicht installationsf?hig
>
> H?ngt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a virtual
package
and is not> provided by any available package
>
>
>
> H?ngt ab von: samba-libs (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist aber
nicht> installationsf?hig
>
>
>
> Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide the bullseye
> repo (samba at the moment same version)
>
>
>
> Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version:
>
> 1) samba [Nicht installiert]
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hi, yes sure... See inline> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L. van Belle via > samba > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36 > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > Hai Dirk, > > Can you give me a output of both servers. > dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient "root at dc02:~# dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient " ii krb5-config 2.6+nmu1 all Configuration files for Kerberos Version 5 ii krb5-user 1.18.3-6+deb11u1 armhf basic programs to authenticate using MIT Kerberos ii libgssapi-krb5-2:armhf 1.18.3-6+deb11u1 armhf MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - krb5 GSS-API Mechanism ii libkrb5-26-heimdal:armhf 7.7.0+dfsg-2+b2 armhf Heimdal Kerberos - libraries ii libkrb5-3:armhf 1.18.3-6+deb11u1 armhf MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libkrb5support0:armhf 1.18.3-6+deb11u1 armhf MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - Support library ii libwbclient0:armhf 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 armhf Samba winbind client library rc samba 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 armhf SMB/CIFS file, print, and login server for Unix rc samba-common 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 all common files used by both the Samba server and client rc winbind 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 armhf service to resolve user and group information from Windows NT servers> > I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing this innewer> version. > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1 > > S is higher that L > > Quick fix, remove samba and install it again.. > Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options. > All data and configs will stay as is.. > > The new format will be for the 4.16 line. > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1 < not sure if i will build these. > Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not supported onbuster.> > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1 > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1 < not sure if i will build these, > same reason as above but for focal. > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1 > > The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+ > > if you want sooner to 4.16.1 > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye- > backports&arch=any&searcho > n=names&keywords=samba > Micheal (new samba debian maintainer) provided already a backport. > > so what's the difference compaired to mine and the debian-backports, not > much anymore. > > last changelog. > samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium > > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Rebuild from bullseye-backports. > Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for needed depends > * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter > * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend > This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. > Info > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backend > > -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl> Mon, 09 May 2022 10:59:16 +0200 > > im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, these will beonline> this week. > At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now. > > PS. Small side note, > just got a message from Michael, that the current backported samba doesnot> support SSSD yet. > fix soon, see debian bug #1010801 > > > Greetz, > > Louis > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39 > > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org> > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed allsources.list> to > > bullseye. > > > > > > > > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents of van-belle.list: > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list > > > > # AptVanBelle repo for samba. > > > > #deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main > > > > deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main > > > > > > > > So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba while upgrading. > > When I now want to reinstall I get this. > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude update > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 InRelease > > > > Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye InRelease > > > > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye InRelease > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 InRelease > > > > Treffer https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest bullseye > > InRelease > > > > Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge InRelease > > > > Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge Release > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade > > > > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig > > > > Abh?ngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig > > > > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig > > > > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig > > > > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht > aktualisiert. > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba > > > > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zus?tzlich installiert: > > > > acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} python3-cffi-backend{a} python3- > > cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3-markdown{a} python3- > > pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b} > > > > samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a} > > > > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zus?tzlich installiert, 0 werden entfernt und0> nicht > > aktualisiert. > > > > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven m?ssen heruntergeladen werden. Nach dem > > Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zus?tzlich belegt sein. > > > > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abh?ngigkeiten: > > > > samba : H?ngt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is installed > > > > H?ngt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht installationsf?hig > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-common-bin (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist > aber > > nicht installationsf?hig > > > > H?ngt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a virtualpackage> and is not > > provided by any available package > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-libs (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist aber > nicht > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide the bullseye > > repo (samba at the moment same version) > > > > > > > > Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version: > > > > 1) samba [Nicht installiert] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Ok, at least a : apt-get remove libwbclient0 samba-common winbind samba run a dpkg -l |grep "4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1" to make sure nothing is there as left over. and install them back. apt-get install samba winbind smbclient and your up and running again. Sorry for this. I'll take care of it. ps.. I do recommend also to clean up also and remove all buster packages.. to see these.. dpkg -l |grep -v "ii" Greetz, Louis> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 13:45 > Aan: belle at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > Hi, > > yes sure... See inline > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L. van Belle > > via samba > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36 > > An: samba at lists.samba.org > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > Hai Dirk, > > > > Can you give me a output of both servers. > > dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient " > > root at dc02:~# dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient " > ii krb5-config 2.6+nmu1 > all Configuration files for Kerberos Version 5 > ii krb5-user 1.18.3-6+deb11u1 > armhf basic programs to authenticate using MIT Kerberos > ii libgssapi-krb5-2:armhf 1.18.3-6+deb11u1 > armhf MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - krb5 GSS-API Mechanism > ii libkrb5-26-heimdal:armhf 7.7.0+dfsg-2+b2 > armhf Heimdal Kerberos - libraries > ii libkrb5-3:armhf 1.18.3-6+deb11u1 > armhf MIT Kerberos runtime libraries > ii libkrb5support0:armhf 1.18.3-6+deb11u1 > armhf MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - Support library > ii libwbclient0:armhf 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > armhf Samba winbind client library > rc samba 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > armhf SMB/CIFS file, print, and login server for Unix > rc samba-common 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > all common files used by both the Samba server and client > rc winbind 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > armhf service to resolve user and group information from Windows NT > servers > > > > > > I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing this in > newer > > version. > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1 > > > > S is higher that L > > > > Quick fix, remove samba and install it again.. > > Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options. > > All data and configs will stay as is.. > > > > The new format will be for the 4.16 line. > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1 < not sure if i will build these. > > Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not supported on > buster. > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1 > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1 < not sure if i will build these, > > same reason as above but for focal. > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1 > > > > The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+ > > > > if you want sooner to 4.16.1 > > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye- > > backports&arch=any&searcho > > n=names&keywords=samba > > Micheal (new samba debian maintainer) provided already a backport. > > > > so what's the difference compaired to mine and the debian-backports, > > not much anymore. > > > > last changelog. > > samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium > > > > * Non-maintainer upload. > > * Rebuild from bullseye-backports. > > Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for needed depends > > * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter > > * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend > > This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. > > Info > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backend > > > > -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl> Mon, 09 May 2022 10:59:16 > > +0200 > > > > im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, these will > > be > online > > this week. > > At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now. > > > > PS. Small side note, > > just got a message from Michael, that the current backported samba > > does > not > > support SSSD yet. > > fix soon, see debian bug #1010801 > > > > > > Greetz, > > > > Louis > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39 > > > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org> > > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed all > sources.list > > to > > > bullseye. > > > > > > > > > > > > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents of van-belle.list: > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list > > > > > > # AptVanBelle repo for samba. > > > > > > #deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main > > > > > > deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main > > > > > > > > > > > > So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba while upgrading. > > > When I now want to reinstall I get this. > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude update > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 InRelease > > > > > > Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye InRelease > > > > > > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye InRelease > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 InRelease > > > > > > Treffer https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest > > > bullseye InRelease > > > > > > Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge > InRelease > > > > > > Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge > > > Release > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade > > > > > > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig > > > > > > Abh?ngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig > > > > > > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig > > > > > > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig > > > > > > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba > > > > > > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zus?tzlich installiert: > > > > > > acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} python3-cffi-backend{a} > > > python3- cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3-markdown{a} > > > python3- pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b} > > > > > > samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a} > > > > > > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zus?tzlich installiert, 0 werden entfernt > > > und > 0 > > nicht > > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven m?ssen heruntergeladen werden. Nach > > > dem Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zus?tzlich belegt sein. > > > > > > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abh?ngigkeiten: > > > > > > samba : H?ngt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is installed > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-common-bin (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) > > > ist > > aber > > > nicht installationsf?hig > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a virtual > package > > and is not > > > provided by any available package > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-libs (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist > > > aber > > nicht > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide the > > > bullseye repo (samba at the moment same version) > > > > > > > > > > > > Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version: > > > > > > 1) samba [Nicht installiert] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative?> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L. van Belle via > samba > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36 > An: samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > Hai Dirk, > > Can you give me a output of both servers. > dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient " > > I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing this innewer> version. > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1 > > S is higher that L > > Quick fix, remove samba and install it again.. > Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options. > All data and configs will stay as is.. > > The new format will be for the 4.16 line. > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1 < not sure if i will build these. > Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not supported onbuster.> > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1 > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1 < not sure if i will build these, > same reason as above but for focal. > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1 > > The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+ > > if you want sooner to 4.16.1 > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye- > backports&arch=any&searcho > n=names&keywords=samba > Micheal (new samba debian maintainer) provided already a backport. > > so what's the difference compaired to mine and the debian-backports, not > much anymore. > > last changelog. > samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium > > * Non-maintainer upload. > * Rebuild from bullseye-backports. > Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for needed depends > * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter > * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend > This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. > Info > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backend > > -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl> Mon, 09 May 2022 10:59:16 +0200 > > im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, these will beonline> this week. > At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now. > > PS. Small side note, > just got a message from Michael, that the current backported samba doesnot> support SSSD yet. > fix soon, see debian bug #1010801 > > > Greetz, > > Louis > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39 > > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org> > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed allsources.list> to > > bullseye. > > > > > > > > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents of van-belle.list: > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list > > > > # AptVanBelle repo for samba. > > > > #deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main > > > > deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main > > > > > > > > So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba while upgrading. > > When I now want to reinstall I get this. > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude update > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 InRelease > > > > Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye InRelease > > > > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye InRelease > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 InRelease > > > > Treffer https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest bullseye > > InRelease > > > > Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge InRelease > > > > Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge Release > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade > > > > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig > > > > Abh?ngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig > > > > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig > > > > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig > > > > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht > aktualisiert. > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba > > > > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zus?tzlich installiert: > > > > acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} python3-cffi-backend{a} python3- > > cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3-markdown{a} python3- > > pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b} > > > > samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a} > > > > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zus?tzlich installiert, 0 werden entfernt und0> nicht > > aktualisiert. > > > > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven m?ssen heruntergeladen werden. Nach dem > > Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zus?tzlich belegt sein. > > > > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abh?ngigkeiten: > > > > samba : H?ngt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is installed > > > > H?ngt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht installationsf?hig > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-common-bin (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist > aber > > nicht installationsf?hig > > > > H?ngt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a virtualpackage> and is not > > provided by any available package > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-libs (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist aber > nicht > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide the bullseye > > repo (samba at the moment same version) > > > > > > > > Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version: > > > > 1) samba [Nicht installiert] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hi Dirk> If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative?That?s possible now, correct. Well, before Micheal, there was not debian-backports samba.. I wanted todo that, but that was a to big job for me. Micheal worked his ass of to get it this far. An amazing job he did, I followed all changes closely. Which is also why I didn?t release any 4.16.x packages yet. As soon the freeze is in for wormbook ( debian 12) we cant update samba anymore in debian for new stable. Micheal made sure at least 4.16.x gets in. He fixed a lot already. I will be provinding higher samba version to Debian Stable where needed. I will be doing the lower current versions also conform samba schedule. So thanks to all effort of him, now you can step in also on debian-backports Unless, you use profiling-data or Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. then you must use my packages. Samba on Debian got way way better thanks to Michael, and I fully rely on the maintainers so, all he did, will get adopted in mine. but only as of 4.16, im not backporting all his changes.. way to much work. (* sorry) and please to read the change logs, before you install them. https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.16.0.html Greetz, Louis> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 14:32 > Aan: belle at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > If i understand your right, using backports is an alternative? > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> Im Auftrag von L. van Belle > > via samba > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2022 13:36 > > An: samba at lists.samba.org > > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > Hai Dirk, > > > > Can you give me a output of both servers. > > dpkg -l | grep -E "samba|winbind|krb5|smbclient " > > > > I think I see where this is coming from, im already adressing this in > newer > > version. > > > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1 > > 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1bullseye1 > > > > S is higher that L > > > > Quick fix, remove samba and install it again.. > > Just don?t use --autoremove --purge options. > > All data and configs will stay as is.. > > > > The new format will be for the 4.16 line. > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb10+1 < not sure if i will build these. > > Reason for that is, there are things enabled that are not supported on > buster. > > > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1 > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~20.04+1 < not sure if i will build these, > > same reason as above but for focal. > > samba_4.16.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0~22.04+1 > > > > The why not, vfs_uring needs kernel 5.1+ > > > > if you want sooner to 4.16.1 > > https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bullseye- > > backports&arch=any&searcho > > n=names&keywords=samba > > Micheal (new samba debian maintainer) provided already a backport. > > > > so what's the difference compaired to mine and the debian-backports, > > not much anymore. > > > > last changelog. > > samba (2:4.16.1+dfsg-3nmu1~deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium > > > > * Non-maintainer upload. > > * Rebuild from bullseye-backports. > > Please don't forget to enable Debian Backports for needed depends > > * d/rules, Add profiling-data build parameter > > * d/control, Enabled tracker-sparql-2.0 as build depend > > This enables support for Spotlight with Gnome Tracker Backend. > > Info > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Spotlight_with_Gnome_Tracker_Backend > > > > -- Louis van Belle <louis at van-belle.nl> Mon, 09 May 2022 10:59:16 > > +0200 > > > > im not done with testing them, but if all goes as expected, these will > > be > online > > this week. > > At least the debian Bullseye line, very soon now. > > > > PS. Small side note, > > just got a message from Michael, that the current backported samba > > does > not > > support SSSD yet. > > fix soon, see debian bug #1010801 > > > > > > Greetz, > > > > Louis > > > > > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: samba Namens Dirk Laurenz via samba > > > Verzonden: dinsdag 10 mei 2022 12:39 > > > Aan: 'sambalist' <samba at lists.samba.org> > > > Onderwerp: [Samba] Broken Dependencies? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > i upgraded a raspian from buster to bullseye and changed all > sources.list > > to > > > bullseye. > > > > > > > > > > > > Samba want?s outdated packages? This is the contents of van-belle.list: > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list > > > > > > # AptVanBelle repo for samba. > > > > > > #deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ buster-samba415 main > > > > > > deb [arch=armhf signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/louis-van-belle.gpg] > > > http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian/ bullseye-samba415 main > > > > > > > > > > > > So far everything went well, but apt uninstalled samba while upgrading. > > > When I now want to reinstall I get this. > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude update > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-samba415 InRelease > > > > > > Treffer http://raspbian.raspberrypi.org/raspbian bullseye InRelease > > > > > > Treffer http://archive.raspberrypi.org/debian bullseye InRelease > > > > > > Treffer http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian bullseye-samba415 InRelease > > > > > > Treffer https://repo.saltproject.io/py3/debian/11/amd64/latest > > > bullseye InRelease > > > > > > Ign https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge > InRelease > > > > > > Treffer https://download.webmin.com/download/repository sarge > > > Release > > > > > > > > > > > > root at dc02:~# apt-get full-upgrade > > > > > > Paketlisten werden gelesen? Fertig > > > > > > Abh?ngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut? Fertig > > > > > > Statusinformationen werden eingelesen? Fertig > > > > > > Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet? Fertig > > > > > > 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > root at dc02:~# aptitude install samba > > > > > > Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zus?tzlich installiert: > > > > > > acl{a} attr{a} libldb2{a} libtdb1{a} python3-cffi-backend{a} > > > python3- cryptography{a} python3-dnspython{a} python3-markdown{a} > > > python3- pygments{a} python3-requests-toolbelt{a} samba{b} > > > > > > samba-common{a} tdb-tools{a} > > > > > > 0 Pakete aktualisiert, 13 zus?tzlich installiert, 0 werden entfernt > > > und > 0 > > nicht > > > aktualisiert. > > > > > > 1.244 kB/2.822 kB an Archiven m?ssen heruntergeladen werden. Nach > > > dem Entpacken werden 24,5 MB zus?tzlich belegt sein. > > > > > > Die folgenden Pakete haben verletzte Abh?ngigkeiten: > > > > > > samba : H?ngt ab von: python3 (< 3.8) but 3.9.2-3 is installed > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: python3-samba ist aber nicht > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-common-bin (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) > > > ist > > aber > > > nicht installationsf?hig > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: libpython3.7 (>= 3.7.0) which is a virtual > package > > and is not > > > provided by any available package > > > > > > > > > > > > H?ngt ab von: samba-libs (= 2:4.15.7+dfsg-0.1buster1) ist > > > aber > > nicht > > > installationsf?hig > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is samba requesting buster packages although I provide the > > > bullseye repo (samba at the moment same version) > > > > > > > > > > > > Beibehalten der folgenden Pakete in ihrer aktuellen Version: > > > > > > 1) samba [Nicht installiert] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba