Good morning Patrick, If people want use Arch, well, happy for them, i use Arch's wiki a lot, has good examples. But.. im a Debian guy, i'll stay a debian guy. ;-) As far i know, no reverse zone is created automaticly.. Not in windows not in samba. But the bug is about the restore of the zone, if its in the backup is "should" be restored, And/or that when its created (* with older versions of samba), it might be missing/did miss the NS records.. And yes, Arch might have fewer dependencies.. I have things enabled which users like and is not in debian or ubuntu enabled. The difference isnt big but that part does give few extra depends. Also, on the point of dependencies.. There is a change coming in debian/ubuntu I only havent had the time yet to check it, but that will result in lesser dependencies. Soon.. Greetz, Louis> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Patrick Goetz via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 17 februari 2022 18:08 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Bind9 and reverse-zones > > So, I've been using the internal DNS server, and reverse-zone records > aren't created here, either. In fact, I've only been able to get `net > ads join` to create forward-zone records on Ubuntu. > > As I reported a few days ago, no matter what I try I can't get it to > create forward-zone records for Arch linux systems. I > finally gave up, > joined the Arch client to the domain and just created the forward and > reverse-zone records by hand myself. Otherwise the Arch deployment is > simpler than Ubuntu; fewer packages to install with reasonable > dependencies, and of course on Arch you always get the most current > version of Samba automatically. > > Very much doubt this observation is going to put Louis out of > business. <:) > > > On 2/17/22 10:08, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > > > > > Am 17.02.22 um 16:46 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > >> Which samba version? > > was 4.12 now updated to 4.13 on the way to 4.15 :-) > > I think I will write a bug report about the mising NS-record :-) > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > >
On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 09:16 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:> Good morning Patrick, > > If people want use Arch, well, happy for them, i use Arch's wiki a > lot, has good examples. > But.. im a Debian guy, i'll stay a debian guy. ;-) > > As far i know, no reverse zone is created automaticly.. Not in > windows not in samba. > But the bug is about the restore of the zone, if its in the backup is > "should" be restored,It probably is getting restored, but with the wrong nameservers in the reversezone (the old DC(s)). There is nothing to add the new one, there is no mention of the reverszone in dns_update_list.> And/or that when its created (* with older versions of samba), > it might be missing/did miss the NS records.. > > And yes, Arch might have fewer dependencies.. > I have things enabled which users like and is not in debian or ubuntu > enabled. > The difference isnt big but that part does give few extra depends. > > Also, on the point of dependencies.. There is a change coming in > debian/ubuntu > I only havent had the time yet to check it, but that will result in > lesser dependencies.Any chance of a link to the change ? Rowland
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 18 februari 2022 10:08 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Bind9 and reverse-zones > > On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 09:16 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > > Good morning Patrick, > > > > If people want use Arch, well, happy for them, i use Arch's wiki a > > lot, has good examples. > > But.. im a Debian guy, i'll stay a debian guy. ;-) > > > > As far i know, no reverse zone is created automaticly.. Not in > > windows not in samba. > > But the bug is about the restore of the zone, if its in the > > backup is "should" be restored, > > It probably is getting restored, but with the wrong nameservers in the > reversezone (the old DC(s)). There is nothing to add the new > one, there > is no mention of the reverszone in dns_update_list.That's logical, we cant deterimin which zone might me need or in which subnet our ip is. Like, if i have ip 10.0.0.1 Same does not know if that is a /24 or /16 /8 or any other subnet. This is why we have to create the zones.> > > And/or that when its created (* with older versions of samba), > > it might be missing/did miss the NS records.. > > > > And yes, Arch might have fewer dependencies.. > > I have things enabled which users like and is not in debian > > or ubuntu enabled. > > The difference isnt big but that part does give few extra depends. > > > > Also, on the point of dependencies.. There is a change coming in > > debian/ubuntu > > I only havent had the time yet to check it, but that will result in > > lesser dependencies. > > Any chance of a link to the change ?https://salsa.debian.org/samba-team/samba/-/merge_requests/56 I've not tested it myself yet, i hope to get some time today. So far, Greetz, Louis
Am 18.02.22 um 09:16 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba:> As far i know, no reverse zone is created automaticly.. Not in windows not in samba. > But the bug is about the restore of the zone, if its in the backup is "should" be restored,That's right, neither Windows or Samba are creating the revers-zone automatically BUT if I backup AD AND having a revers-zone I think with a recovery the reverse-zone MUST work after the recovery. Think when do you want need to recover your domain. I think in case you need to recover your domain yue have enough stress s oyou don't need the stress of a missing NS-record in all your revers-zones