On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 11:54 -0300, Marcos Ariel Negrini via samba wrote:> Hello: > I am setting up a lab are samba4 AD + bind9. For now it works > without > problems. My idea is to join other Samba4 and I have doubts about > Bind,I had to read this a few times before I understood it, the problem being that I (as an English person) would never use 'doubts' in the context above, I think you mean 'I have a question about Bind'. If so, then yes, Bind9 uses BIND_DLZ on each DC that it runs on. There are no dns slaves in AD they are all masters, this is known as multimaster. There is no such thing as local AD. Provided that replication is working correctly (and you have real problems if it isn't), the AD databases stored on each DC should be virtually identical (there are a few attributes that do not replicate). If you are going to use Bind9 with Samba AD, then set it up correctly on the first DC and then use the same named.conf files on all other DC's. Rowland
Hello Rowland: my English is very bad... and I helped myself with a translator... sorry for this. And thank you very much, that's exactly what I needed to know to move forward. Regards Marcos El 15/7/21 a las 12:26, Rowland Penny via samba escribi?:> I had to read this a few times before I understood it, the problem > being that I (as an English person) would never use 'doubts' in the > context above, I think you mean 'I have a question about Bind'. > > If so, then yes, Bind9 uses BIND_DLZ on each DC that it runs on. There > are no dns slaves in AD they are all masters, this is known as > multimaster. There is no such thing as local AD. Provided that > replication is working correctly (and you have real problems if it > isn't), the AD databases stored on each DC should be virtually > identical (there are a few attributes that do not replicate). > > If you are going to use Bind9 with Samba AD, then set it up correctly > on the first DC and then use the same named.conf files on all other > DC's. > > Rowland