I will claim that 95% of all potential contributions will get lost if
it's not very-easy to publish. I myself have tried for many days to
get a login without success.
Wikipedia and Arch Linux allow everybody to contribute very easy! And
that's why their wiki are one of the most up-to-date wikies on the
internet and they are actually very clean and high quality.
And the samba wiki is in my view not up-to-date. But that's not really
the point. Let's say, for the argument it was up-to-date, it will
still be out-dated sooner or later. So it would be nice if it was
possible to update for everybody relatively easy (I'll claim it not
possible in practice even thought you says otherwise).
Again, just look at wikipedia.....it says it all.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 10:15 AM Rowland Penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:>
> On Tue, 2021-07-06 at 10:09 +0200, BW wrote:
> > Or perhaps even better: make it more community driven......wikipedia
> > and archlinux good role models.
> > I would love to contribute myself.
>
> All contributions are welcome, but the Samba wiki is based around a
> self compiled version of Samba (everything in /usr/local/samba), we
> expect the distro's to provide information on how to use Samba on a
> specific distro.
>
> Rowland
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba