Am 10.06.21 um 09:47 schrieb Rowland penny via samba:> On 10/06/2021 08:32, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote:
>> Am 10.06.21 um 08:27 schrieb Weiser, Michael:
>>> My question remains if there's a way to prevent SID history
SIDs from
>>> being mapped once they're no longer needed on a particular
samba
>>> server, to prevent unnecessary bloating of the secondary group
list,
>>> i.e. if there's a way to tell autorid (or nss) to recognize
that
>>> 472199(EXAMPLE\secret), 572198(EXAMPLE\secret) and
>>> 301141(EXAMPLE\secret) are all the same group and only add gid
301141
>>> to the UNIX token.
>>
>> ah, now I get it. :)
>
>
> Hi Ralph, you might get it, but I don't, care to explain it ?
of course, but explain what? :)
-slow
--
Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/
Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sernet.de/en/samba/
GPG-Fingerprint FAE2C6088A24252051C559E4AA1E9B7126399E46
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20210610/940e4116/OpenPGP_signature.sig>