Am 17.02.21 um 11:20 schrieb Dmitry Melekhov:> 17.02.2021 14:16, Reindl Harald ?????: >> >>> when you need to drive at leat 4 hours one way in case server is dead >>> you have different opinion :-) >> >> when you have to drive just because of a software problem you don't >> have infrastructure which deserves the name "production" at all >> >> even if one hosts explodes as long it's pieces don't hit the others >> should have no impact to production >> >> ILO, VPN, HA exists..... >> >> i have not seen the servers in the second office 300 kilometers from >> here physically since they where installed in vienna years ago and >> have never seen the building there at all > > > If you don't understand that there are server usage scenarios different > then you haveand your "stream is not suitable for any production use" is funny followed by "usage scenarios different then you have" your "any" includes mine you have no clue about too....
17.02.2021 14:48, Reindl Harald ?????:> > > Am 17.02.21 um 11:20 schrieb Dmitry Melekhov: >> 17.02.2021 14:16, Reindl Harald ?????: >>> >>>> when you need to drive at leat 4 hours one way in case server is >>>> dead you have different opinion :-) >>> >>> when you have to drive just because of a software problem you don't >>> have infrastructure which deserves the name "production" at all >>> >>> even if one hosts explodes as long it's pieces don't hit the others >>> should have no impact to production >>> >>> ILO, VPN, HA exists..... >>> >>> i have not seen the servers in the second office 300 kilometers from >>> here physically since they where installed in vienna years ago and >>> have never seen the building there at all >> >> >> If you don't understand that there are server usage scenarios >> different then you have > > and your "stream is not suitable for any production use" is funny > followed by "usage scenarios different then you have" > > your "any" includes mine you have no clue about too.... >Stream is not suitable. If yes- why you don't use it? :-)
On 17/02/2021 10:48, Reindl Harald via samba wrote:> > > Am 17.02.21 um 11:20 schrieb Dmitry Melekhov: >> 17.02.2021 14:16, Reindl Harald ?????: >>> >>>> when you need to drive at leat 4 hours one way in case server is >>>> dead you have different opinion :-) >>> >>> when you have to drive just because of a software problem you don't >>> have infrastructure which deserves the name "production" at all >>> >>> even if one hosts explodes as long it's pieces don't hit the others >>> should have no impact to production >>> >>> ILO, VPN, HA exists..... >>> >>> i have not seen the servers in the second office 300 kilometers from >>> here physically since they where installed in vienna years ago and >>> have never seen the building there at all >> >> >> If you don't understand that there are server usage scenarios >> different then you have > > and your "stream is not suitable for any production use" is funny > followed by "usage scenarios different then you have" > > your "any" includes mine you have no clue about too.... > >Nice discussion guys, but it has nothing to do with Samba, so can we stop now ? Rowland