17.02.2021 14:03, Reindl Harald ?????:>
>
> Am 17.02.21 um 10:57 schrieb Dmitry Melekhov:
>> 17.02.2021 13:50, Reindl Harald ?????:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 17.02.21 um 05:15 schrieb Dmitry Melekhov via samba:
>>>> 16.02.2021 18:46, S?rgio Basto via samba ?????:
>>>>> On Tue, 2021-02-16 at 09:21 +0100, L.P.H. van Belle via
samba wrote:
>>>>>> Bye bye Centos..
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/01/centos-is-gone-but-rhel-is-now-free-for-up-to-16-production-servers/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Welkom CloudLinux
>>>>>>
https://blog.cloudlinux.com/announcing-open-sourced-community-driven-rhel-fork-by-cloudlinux
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you guys know.
>>>>> I point of view, Centos is not dead , Centos 8 is dead ,
Centos 8
>>>>> stream is live and is the focus , Centos 9 is coming
>>>>>
>>>>>
https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> lie!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> stream is not suitable for any production use
>>>
>>> people telling me that about Fedora again and again while i drive a
>>> whole infrastructure from firewalls over storages to servers since
>>> 2088 on Fedora.....
>>
>> Well, you are from future.
>
> 2008
patch accepted.
>
>> I run Linux servers from 1999 though ;-)
>
> that's not the point
>
> i am simply tired about all the guys not capable walking on their own
> feet and rely on "there will be no visible change within the next 10
> years"
>
> if you think something is not suitable for any production usage the
> reason maybe because you lack automation and tests for your stuff and
> instead rely on "never touch a running system"
when you need to drive at leat 4 hours one way in case server is dead
you have different opinion :-)