> > On my test setup I'm on Samba 4.10.18 & Stretch. > > Now... 4.11 needs Buster from what I understand. > > Wouldn't I need to move to Buster first before going from > 4.10-Stretch to 4.11-Buster? > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/sambaif your now on 4.10 and stretch, now upgrade to buster and samba 4.10 Thats the most easy step. from there you can upgrade samba.. small side note, 4.13.3 is not life, im testing it, but i need to change a thing in the packageing. its planned for next week or next samba release, depending on the time i have. Really busy here at my side due corona.. :-/ Greetz, Louis
On 1/20/2021 10:33 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:>> >> On my test setup I'm on Samba 4.10.18 & Stretch. >> >> Now... 4.11 needs Buster from what I understand. >> >> Wouldn't I need to move to Buster first before going from >> 4.10-Stretch to 4.11-Buster? >> >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > if your now on 4.10 and stretch, now upgrade to buster and samba 4.10 > Thats the most easy step. > > from there you can upgrade samba.. > > small side note, 4.13.3 is not life, im testing it, but i need to change > a thing in the packageing. > its planned for next week or next samba release, depending on the time i have. > > Really busy here at my side due corona.. > :-/ > > Greetz, > > Louis >Thanks for the advice. I don't know if it makes sense for the list, but..... Starting with Debian-Stretch and Samba-Stretch410, I changed all the references from "stretch" to "buster" in sources.list, sources.list.d/main.list & sources.list.d/van-belle.list. Then I ran: apt-get update apt-get upgrade However, when I try to run apt-get full-upgrade or apt-get dist-upgrade I noticed that all the samba packages are being removed. If I go ahead and run the command (including --autoremove and --purge), then upon reboot samba is gone... poof. Should I be going from Stretch-samba49 -> buster-sabma410 instead of Stretch-samba410 -> buster-sabma410? Am I missing some command syntax? Where am I going wrong? Thanks
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Thanks for the advice. I don't know if it makes sense > for the list, but..... > > Starting with Debian-Stretch and Samba-Stretch410, I > changed all the references from "stretch" to "buster" > in sources.list, sources.list.d/main.list & > sources.list.d/van-belle.list. >All goed.> Then I ran: > > apt-get update > apt-get upgradeapt-get dist-upgrade -dy I recomment that. That makes sure all needed packages for upgradeing are on the server. apt-get dist-upgrade> > However, when I try to run > > apt-get full-upgrade > or > apt-get dist-upgrade > > I noticed that all the samba packages are being removed.yes, because, what i said. Samba is heavy bounded on few dependecies, and if one old is not removed Poof.. but no no worries, if you install samba back its all good again..> If I go ahead and run the command (including > --autoremove and --purge), then upon reboot samba > is gone... poof. > > Should I be going from Stretch-samba49 -> buster-sabma410 > instead of Stretch-samba410 -> buster-sabma410? > Am I missing some command syntax?No that is fine, but you can set it to buster-samba411 and it will be upgraded. ( incl libldb ) still if it is removed, just install it back after the upgrade. No need to change anything else, samba is installed again and will use the old data and settings.> > Where am I going wrong?Nothing, but you can avoid that samba will be removed. It's because libldb from stretch is not up upgraded. ( or removed at dist-upgrade ) Greetz, Louis