(Sent from home location.) Bob Wooden On 6/10/20 4:16 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:> Try checking /etc/resolv.conf, it should be: > > search [domain].work > > nameserver <the DC's ipaddress> > > I seem to remember Bind9 being mentioned, is it running ? > > Is /etc/hosts set up correctly ? > > RowlandAnd here ya go. root@[[dchost]:~# cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1??? localhost 192.168.16.50??? [dchost].[domain].work??? [dchost] root@[dchost]:~# systemctl status bind9 ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server ?? Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/bind9.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) ?? Active: *active (running)* since Wed 2020-06-10 15:20:55 CDT; 2h 57min ago ???? Docs: man:named(8) ?Main PID: 590 (named) ??? Tasks: 5 (limit: 4531) ?? CGroup: /system.slice/bind9.service ?????????? ??590 /usr/sbin/named -f -u bind root@[dchost]:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 192.168.16.50 search [domain].work Scratching my head . . . .
(Sent from home location.) Bob Wooden On 6/10/20 7:51 PM, Bob Wooden via samba wrote:> > (Sent from home location.) > > Bob Wooden > > > root@[[dchost]:~# cat /etc/hosts > 127.0.0.1??? localhost > 192.168.16.50??? [dchost].[domain].work??? [dchost] > > root@[dchost]:~# systemctl status bind9 > ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server > ?? Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/bind9.service; enabled; vendor > preset: enabled) > ?? Active: *active (running)* since Wed 2020-06-10 15:20:55 CDT; 2h > 57min ago > ???? Docs: man:named(8) > ?Main PID: 590 (named) > ??? Tasks: 5 (limit: 4531) > ?? CGroup: /system.slice/bind9.service > ?????????? ??590 /usr/sbin/named -f -u bind > > root@[dchost]:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf > nameserver 192.168.16.50 > search [domain].work > > Scratching my head . . . .Adding info. When I "nslookup". I get: root@[dchost]:~# nslookup [dchost].[domain].work Server:??? ??? 192.168.116.50 Address:??? 192.168.116.50#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name:??? [dchost].[domain].work Address: xx.198.245.139 This local active directory is the first I have ever setup with a FQDN. The "Non-authoritative answer: Address" is the ip address of the domain registrar nameserver. The "Server:" address (above that) IS the correct local ip address. Never having used a FQDN in the past, could I have something amiss with my settings that I was not aware made a difference?
On 11/06/2020 12:16, Bob Wooden via samba wrote:> When I "nslookup". I get: > > root@[dchost]:~# nslookup [dchost].[domain].work > Server:??? ??? 192.168.116.50 > Address:??? 192.168.116.50#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > Name:??? [dchost].[domain].work > Address: xx.198.245.139 > > This local active directory is the first I have ever setup with a > FQDN. The "Non-authoritative answer: Address" is the ip address of the > domain registrar nameserver. The "Server:" address (above that) IS the > correct local ip address. > > Never having used a FQDN in the past, could I have something amiss > with my settings that I was not aware made a difference? >If you had a previous AD domain, you must have had a FQDN, but having said that, it does look like you have a configuration error somewhere, so can you post the contents of the following files: /etc/hostname /etc/hosts /etc/resolv.conf /etc/krb5.conf /etc/samba/smb.conf /etc/bind/named.conf /etc/bind/named.conf.options /etc/bind/named.conf.local /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf If you must sanitise them, then do it sanely, use 'example.com' for the domain name and use the case you find in the file ;-) Rowland