samba - Jul 2019 - Samba4 - global catalog (GC) cannot be contacted using Windows 7 RSAT

Hi Rowland,

Noted with thanks.

Regards

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:31 PM Rowland penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 22/07/2019 09:23, Alfonso Conner wrote:
> > Hi Rowland,
> >
> > In fact currently in my test environment using the same version of OS
> > 6.10 and Samba 4.8.5.
> > I ran 'netstat -plaunt | egrep
"ntp|bind|named|samba|?mbd"', I have
> > :::3268, :::3269, I do not see 0.0.0.0:3268
<http://0.0.0.0:3268> and
> > 0.0.0.03269.
> > While I use a Windows PC join to my test domain, I have no issues with
> GC.
> >
> > Not sure how the GC problem can happen but seems to me it looks like a
> > sometimes thing.
> > Would the chances of getting be lower if were to use a higher version
> > of OS and Samba? =)
> Possibly, but I do not use Centos, so I do not really know :-(
> >
> > Now that I have quite a number of Windows PC under this AD, hope you
> > can correct me if I were to use the below steps:
> > I referred from Samba wiki
> > Example to remove DC1 from AD
> > 1) Transfer FSMO to DC2
> > 2) Demote DC1
> > 3) stop DC1 samba service
> > 4) Disconnect DC1 IP
> > 5) Configure new_DC1 IP
> > 6) Join new_DC1 to AD
> > 7) Transfer FSMO from DC2 to the new_DC1
> >
> > I am considering to use CentOS 7.6.1810 with Samba 4.10.6 for my
> > new_DC1. Prefer to use back the same hostname and IP address.
>
> you might prefer to use the same name & IP, but experience has shown
> this isn't a good idea, apart from that, the above is a reasonable way
> to upgrade.
>
> Rowland
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>

Hi Rowland,

Just a curious question.
Since the origin of my AD comes from PDC. If I were to try and do a
classicupgrade, using same IP, same hostname, same realm, will my windows
pc have login issues?

Regards

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 5:04 PM Alfonso Conner <c1581634 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
>
> Noted with thanks.
>
> Regards
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:31 PM Rowland penny via samba <
> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> On 22/07/2019 09:23, Alfonso Conner wrote:
>> > Hi Rowland,
>> >
>> > In fact currently in my test environment using the same version of
OS
>> > 6.10 and Samba 4.8.5.
>> > I ran 'netstat -plaunt | egrep
"ntp|bind|named|samba|?mbd"', I have
>> > :::3268, :::3269, I do not see 0.0.0.0:3268
<http://0.0.0.0:3268> and
>> > 0.0.0.03269.
>> > While I use a Windows PC join to my test domain, I have no issues
with
>> GC.
>> >
>> > Not sure how the GC problem can happen but seems to me it looks
like a
>> > sometimes thing.
>> > Would the chances of getting be lower if were to use a higher
version
>> > of OS and Samba? =)
>> Possibly, but I do not use Centos, so I do not really know :-(
>> >
>> > Now that I have quite a number of Windows PC under this AD, hope
you
>> > can correct me if I were to use the below steps:
>> > I referred from Samba wiki
>> > Example to remove DC1 from AD
>> > 1) Transfer FSMO to DC2
>> > 2) Demote DC1
>> > 3) stop DC1 samba service
>> > 4) Disconnect DC1 IP
>> > 5) Configure new_DC1 IP
>> > 6) Join new_DC1 to AD
>> > 7) Transfer FSMO from DC2 to the new_DC1
>> >
>> > I am considering to use CentOS 7.6.1810 with Samba 4.10.6 for my
>> > new_DC1. Prefer to use back the same hostname and IP address.
>>
>> you might prefer to use the same name & IP, but experience has
shown
>> this isn't a good idea, apart from that, the above is a reasonable
way
>> to upgrade.
>>
>> Rowland
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
>> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>>
>

On 22/07/2019 10:24, Alfonso Conner wrote:
> Hi Rowland,
>
> Just a curious question.
> Since the origin of my AD comes from PDC. If I were to try and do a 
> classicupgrade, using same IP, same hostname, same realm, will my 
> windows pc have login issues?
>
To be honest, I am not entirely sure, you should get the same results 
every time you run the classicupgrade, so your client shouldn't notice 
the difference.

Rowland