Witch aduc on the rsat the user Administrator appared in the group of the domain admin but witch the command getent not appared null Il 13/02/2019 09:54, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto:> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:45:33 +0100 > marco pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, witch command >> >> >> >> It's correct? > It is and then again it isn't ;-) > > It shows that Domain Admins has the Unix ID '10512', but doesn't have > any members, mine is: > > domain_admins:x:10512:administrator,rowland > > Try adding a user to the group, then use that user on Windows. > > Rowland >
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:11:44 +0100 marco pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> Witch aduc on the rsat the user Administrator appared in the group of > the domain admin but witch the command getent not appared null >I had to read that a few times until I understood it ;-) The user 'Administrator' is showing as a member of the 'Domain Admins' group on Windows, but not on the Unix domain member. This is strange ? Try adding this line to smb.conf: winbind expand groups = 2 Rowland PS I think you mean 'with' instead of 'witch', a witch is something else entirely ;-)
Thanks rowald: naw optaing getent group Domain\ Admins domain admins:x:10512:administrator but if I usa administrator to join in the domain i optaing I get that the user does not have the rights to set the permissions to the share wat a war: it dont's want to know :'( Il 13/02/2019 10:37, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto:> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:11:44 +0100 > marco pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Witch aduc on the rsat the user Administrator appared in the group of >> the domain admin but witch the command getent not appared null >> > I had to read that a few times until I understood it ;-) > > The user 'Administrator' is showing as a member of the 'Domain Admins' > group on Windows, but not on the Unix domain member. > > This is strange ? > > Try adding this line to smb.conf: > > winbind expand groups = 2 > > Rowland > > PS I think you mean 'with' instead of 'witch', a witch is something > else entirely ;-) >