... I see this on a 4.8.4 debian DC Aug 31 20:10:19 adc2 samba[657]: task[kccsrv][657]: /usr/sbin/samba_kcc: ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb Aug 31 20:15:19 adc2 samba[657]: task[kccsrv][657]: [2018/08/31 20:15:19.413299, 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:327(samba_runcmd_io_handler) Aug 31 20:15:19 adc2 samba[657]: task[kccsrv][657]: /usr/sbin/samba_kcc: ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb It seems not to be a problem, we see no issues ... but maybe I could/should get rid of that. Does anyone have a clue?
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 20:23:50 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> > ... I see this on a 4.8.4 debian DC > > Aug 31 20:10:19 adc2 samba[657]: task[kccsrv][657]: > /usr/sbin/samba_kcc: ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb > Aug 31 20:15:19 adc2 samba[657]: task[kccsrv][657]: [2018/08/31 > 20:15:19.413299, > 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:327(samba_runcmd_io_handler) Aug 31 > 20:15:19 adc2 samba[657]: task[kccsrv][657]: /usr/sbin/samba_kcc: > ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb > > > It seems not to be a problem, we see no issues ... but maybe I > could/should get rid of that. > > Does anyone have a clue? >Stefan, it is just telling you that 'ldb_wrap' is opening 'secrets.ldb' without problems. If you have 'log level' set to anything other than 0, then comment it out and they may go away, otherwise you will have to put up with the messages, they are harmless. Rowland
Am 31.08.18 um 20:44 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:> Stefan, it is just telling you that 'ldb_wrap' is opening 'secrets.ldb' > without problems. If you have 'log level' set to anything other than 0, > then comment it out and they may go away, otherwise you will have to > put up with the messages, they are harmless.ah, I see, great to know :-) for sure I have log level > 0 (I think 1 at that site) to get a minimum of logging. Or is it an old school assumption that "0" means "no logs" ? No issue, I can look it up in the docs if I really need to ... I plan to wait for Louis moving the deb-pkgs for 4.8.5 into the "stable repos" and then upgrade the 2 DCs first, then the file server. If that works out well, next site, same procedure. greets, Stefan