On Wed, 30 May 2018 06:21:36 +1200 Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 10:00 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > > Mandi! Emmanuel Florac via samba > > In chel di` si favelave... > > > > > > I can fire up bug for the manpage?! > > > > > > At least it should mention the default of 100 and why you would > > > want it at 0 instead. > > > > the bug is exactly for that, manpage lie! ;-) > > > > usershare max shares (G) > > > > This parameter specifies the number of user defined > > shares that are allowed to be created by users belonging to the > > group owning the usershare directory. If set to zero (the default) > > user defined shares are ignored. > > > > Default: usershare max shares = 0 > > You should ask Debian to patch the manpage as well as the code. > > The default upstream is 0, Debian specifically chose 100. > > Andrew BartlettER, so it would need a Debian Samba package maintainer to fix this (on Debian at least). Anybody know a Debian Samba package maintainer ??? ;-) Rowland
On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 19:34 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:> On Wed, 30 May 2018 06:21:36 +1200 > Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 10:00 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > > > > > > the bug is exactly for that, manpage lie! ;-) > > > > > > usershare max shares (G) > > > > > > This parameter specifies the number of user defined > > > shares that are allowed to be created by users belonging to the > > > group owning the usershare directory. If set to zero (the default) > > > user defined shares are ignored. > > > > > > Default: usershare max shares = 0 > > > > You should ask Debian to patch the manpage as well as the code. > > > > The default upstream is 0, Debian specifically chose 100. > > > > Andrew Bartlett > > ER, so it would need a Debian Samba package maintainer to fix this (on > Debian at least). Anybody know a Debian Samba package maintainer ??? ;-)Sorry, don't know any. But bugs.debian.org is that way ---> ;-) Andrew Bartlett (lurking, very occasional Samba Debian Package maintainer. Mostly in the pinch when security things get complex). -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
On Wed, 30 May 2018 08:11:57 +1200 Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:> On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 19:34 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Wed, 30 May 2018 06:21:36 +1200 > > Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 10:00 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > > > > > > > > the bug is exactly for that, manpage lie! ;-) > > > > > > > > usershare max shares (G) > > > > > > > > This parameter specifies the number of user defined > > > > shares that are allowed to be created by users belonging to the > > > > group owning the usershare directory. If set to zero (the > > > > default) user defined shares are ignored. > > > > > > > > Default: usershare max shares = 0 > > > > > > You should ask Debian to patch the manpage as well as the code. > > > > > > The default upstream is 0, Debian specifically chose 100. > > > > > > Andrew Bartlett > > > > ER, so it would need a Debian Samba package maintainer to fix this > > (on Debian at least). Anybody know a Debian Samba package > > maintainer ??? ;-) > > Sorry, don't know any. But bugs.debian.org is that way ---> ;-)So, as I don't use Debian, I suppose I should report this to my package supplier, or my OS ? If so, Hello Louis, where do I report bugs ?> > Andrew Bartlett > (lurking, very occasional Samba Debian Package maintainer. Mostly in > the pinch when security things get complex). >I knew I Knew a Debian Samba package maintainer LOL Rowland
Reported. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900396 Greetz, Louis> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 29 mei 2018 22:35 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] weird messages in logs > > On Wed, 30 May 2018 08:11:57 +1200 > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 19:34 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 May 2018 06:21:36 +1200 > > > Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 10:00 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via > samba wrote: > > > > > > > > > > the bug is exactly for that, manpage lie! ;-) > > > > > > > > > > usershare max shares (G) > > > > > > > > > > This parameter specifies the number of user defined > > > > > shares that are allowed to be created by users > belonging to the > > > > > group owning the usershare directory. If set to zero (the > > > > > default) user defined shares are ignored. > > > > > > > > > > Default: usershare max shares = 0 > > > > > > > > You should ask Debian to patch the manpage as well as the code. > > > > > > > > The default upstream is 0, Debian specifically chose 100. > > > > > > > > Andrew Bartlett > > > > > > ER, so it would need a Debian Samba package maintainer to fix this > > > (on Debian at least). Anybody know a Debian Samba package > > > maintainer ??? ;-) > > > > Sorry, don't know any. But bugs.debian.org is that way ---> ;-) > > So, as I don't use Debian, I suppose I should report this to > my package > supplier, or my OS ? > > If so, Hello Louis, where do I report bugs ? > > > > > Andrew Bartlett > > (lurking, very occasional Samba Debian Package maintainer. > Mostly in > > the pinch when security things get complex). > > > > I knew I Knew a Debian Samba package maintainer LOL > > Rowland > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > >