samba - Jul 2017 - Invalid parameter error

I'm sorry. I probably should have linked their samba fork:
https://github.com/freenas/samba You can look at the commits from around
the time period of the bug report. It looks like quite a lot of work in
./python/samba/provision/

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 17:23:28 -0500
> Andrew Walker via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > I believe that iXsystems recently patched Samba 4.6 in FreeNAS so
> > that it can act as an AD DC. https://bugs.freenas.org/issues/23566
> >
>
> OK, after reading the above link, I am still no wiser just what they
> have done to fix it, I also haven't seen any proposed patches on
> Samba-technical. It just says resolved without any information on how
> it was resolved, just a reference to a branch.
>
> Rowland
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>

On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 05:27:13 -0500
Andrew Walker via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> I'm sorry. I probably should have linked their samba fork:
> https://github.com/freenas/samba You can look at the commits from
> around the time period of the bug report. It looks like quite a lot
> of work in ./python/samba/provision/
> 
Yes I found them, patched 4.6.5 and I am now trying to build Samba on
ghostbsd (freebsd in disguise), if it works, then Freenas needs to
propose their patches to Samba.

Rowland

On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 12:17:42 +0100
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017 05:27:13 -0500
> Andrew Walker via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> 
> > I'm sorry. I probably should have linked their samba fork:
> > https://github.com/freenas/samba You can look at the commits from
> > around the time period of the bug report. It looks like quite a lot
> > of work in ./python/samba/provision/
> > 
> 
> Yes I found them, patched 4.6.5 and I am now trying to build Samba on
> ghostbsd (freebsd in disguise), if it works, then Freenas needs to
> propose their patches to Samba.
> 
> Rowland 
> 
Well it builds, but still doesn't provision:

Setting up self join
set_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER.
ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741811, 'Unexpected information
received')
  File
"/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py",
line 176, in _run
    return self.run(*args, **kwargs)
  File
"/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/domain.py",
line 471, in run
    nosync=ldap_backend_nosync, ldap_dryrun_mode=ldap_dryrun_mode)
  File
"/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py",
line 2183, in provision
    skip_sysvolacl=skip_sysvolacl)
  File
"/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py",
line 1811, in provision_fill
    names.domaindn, lp, use_ntvfs)
  File
"/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py",
line 1595, in setsysvolacl
    service=SYSVOL_SERVICE)
  File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/ntacls.py",
line 162, in setntacl
    smbd.set_nt_acl(file, security.SECINFO_OWNER | security.SECINFO_GROUP |
security.SECINFO_DACL | security.SECINFO_SACL, sd, service=service)

Looks like it needs more work ;-)

Rowland