On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 22:09:22 +0100 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> > > Am 13.12.2016 um 21:58 schrieb Kris Lou via samba: > > "python-crypto" looks like it's also in EPEL. > > > > http://rpms.famillecollet.com/rpmphp/zoom.php?rpm=python-crypto > > looks so, "yum" is just too dumb to find it when the binary rpm is > just called "python2-crypto" and "yum install python-crypto" would > have found it > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3575 > > so the OP seems to be very new in Redhat land or why don#t he setup > the EPEL repo straight after basic install as virtually everybody else > > anyways: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba#Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux_.2F_CentOS_.2F_Scientific_Linux > don't mention the repo because it's obviously written in RHEL6 times > > and no, Rowland, this is nothing for the RHEL support contract > because by adding software from 3rd party repos you are way out of > support - periodThis has everything to do with an RHEL support contract (if the OP has one), you need python-crypto to build Samba for an AD DC, so if the OP has a contract, he should ask red-hat just how he is supposed to build Samba without a required package ?? If he doesn't have a contract, then he can do an internet search to find out where to get them from. Rowland
Am 13.12.2016 um 22:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:>> and no, Rowland, this is nothing for the RHEL support contract >> because by adding software from 3rd party repos you are way out of >> support - period > > This has everything to do with an RHEL support contract (if the OP has > one), you need python-crypto to build Samba for an AD DC, so if the OP > has a contract, he should ask red-hat just how he is supposed to build > Samba without a required package ?? > > If he doesn't have a contract, then he can do an internet search to > find out where to get them fromso why not shut down the mailing-list at all if everybody just has to call Redhat or search in the internet - that's what you are saying (probably without beeing aware of it)
Am 13.12.2016 um 22:58 schrieb Sebastião Guerra:> CentOS7.3 have samba-dc on version 4.4, I think RedHat have to. Why not > from repositories instead compiling?most likely because AD and samba won't work that well with MIT kerberos P.S.: what about people writing on a mailing-list just use a mail-client which supports mailing-lists (aka reply-list button)> 2016-12-13 19:32 GMT-02:00 Reindl Harald via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>>: > > > > Am 13.12.2016 um 22:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > and no, Rowland, this is nothing for the RHEL support contract > because by adding software from 3rd party repos you are way > out of > support - period > > > This has everything to do with an RHEL support contract (if the > OP has > one), you need python-crypto to build Samba for an AD DC, so if > the OP > has a contract, he should ask red-hat just how he is supposed to > build > Samba without a required package ?? > > If he doesn't have a contract, then he can do an internet search to > find out where to get them from > > > so why not shut down the mailing-list at all if everybody just has > to call Redhat or search in the internet - that's what you are > saying (probably without beeing aware of it)
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, Reindl Harald via samba wrote:> Am 13.12.2016 um 22:58 schrieb Sebastião Guerra: >> CentOS7.3 have samba-dc on version 4.4, I think RedHat have to. Why not >> from repositories instead compiling? > > most likely because AD and samba won't work that well with MIT kerberosCorrect. Redhat's Samba packages do not include DC support for that reason. There is a DC package, but it does not contain what one would hope it does: # rpm -ql samba-dc /usr/share/doc/samba-dc-4.4.4 /usr/share/doc/samba-dc-4.4.4/README.dc # cat /usr/share/doc/samba-dc-4.4.4/README.dc MIT Kerberos 5 Support ====================== Fedora is using MIT Kerberos implementation as its Kerberos infrastructure of choice. The Samba build in Fedora is using MIT Kerberos implementation in order to allow system-wide interoperability between both desktop and server applications running on the same machine. At the moment the Samba Active Directory Domain Controller implementation is not available with MIT Kereberos. FreeIPA and Samba Team members are currently working on Samba MIT Kerberos support as this is a requirement for a GNU/Linux distribution integration of Samba AD DC features. We have just finished migrating the file server and all client utilities to MIT Kerberos. The result of this work is available in samba-* packages in Fedora. We'll provide Samba AD DC functionality as soon as its support of MIT Kerberos KDC will be ready. In case of further questions do not hesitate to send your inquiries to samba-owner at fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 22:32:13 +0100 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> > > Am 13.12.2016 um 22:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >> and no, Rowland, this is nothing for the RHEL support contract > >> because by adding software from 3rd party repos you are way out of > >> support - period > > > > This has everything to do with an RHEL support contract (if the OP > > has one), you need python-crypto to build Samba for an AD DC, so if > > the OP has a contract, he should ask red-hat just how he is > > supposed to build Samba without a required package ?? > > > > If he doesn't have a contract, then he can do an internet search to > > find out where to get them from > > so why not shut down the mailing-list at all if everybody just has to > call Redhat or search in the internet - that's what you are saying > (probably without beeing aware of it) >That is NOT what I said or meant, please stop being a troll. If the OP has a red-hat contract, then he should ask them if there are replacements for the missing packages, they may not really be aware they are needed, mainly because there is no Samba AD DC package on RHEL. Lets be perfectly honest here, this is not a Samba problem, it is a RHEL problem, if you have ALL the dependencies, Samba builds correctly. Rowland