Hi Igor, Am 26.08.2016 um 13:23 schrieb Igor & Sandra:> I am part of a group of studies and learning samba 4. > The greatest difficulty is the language, many do not know English. > We set up a team to translate the documentation Samba 4 for our > language. > We would like to take the translation into Portuguese and make it > official.As said in my previous mail: Our policy is to avoid language-specific documentation. For example, during the last days I started updating minor stuff in the Wiki up to rewriting complete pages. If the translator group won't do the same for the foreign language documentation, it is quickly outdated or wrong. Additionally only people speaking the language, and having the technical background, can verify if everything is correct. Just a simple example: Many people use wrong terms like "Samba 4" when they mean "Samba AD", "PDC" instead of "DC", and so on. However, all English-language contributions to our official documentation are appreciated. :-) Regards, Marc
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:13:59 +0200 Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:> For example, during the last days I started updating minor stuff in > the Wiki up to rewriting complete pages. If the translator group > won't do the same for the foreign language documentation, it is > quickly outdated or wrong. >Hi Marc, funny you should say that, Bob Donelson reported that the heading for this page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/Unison_based_SysVol_replication_workaround#Installation Didn't match the content because it now uses 'osync' instead of 'unison'. I checked and it was changed about a year ago, but who ever changed it, hasn't kept it updated, there is at least one broken link and the conf file for 'osync' has changed, so what was that you were saying about getting out of date ;-) I will update the page, but I also think the 'unison' page should be brought back. Rowland
Hi Rowland, Am 26.08.2016 um 17:21 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:> Hi Marc, funny you should say that, Bob Donelson reported that the > heading for this page: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Bidirectional_Rsync/Unison_based_SysVol_replication_workaround#Installation > > Didn't match the content because it now uses 'osync' instead of > 'unison'. > > I checked and it was changed about a year ago, but who ever changed it, > hasn't kept it updated, there is at least one broken link and the conf > file for 'osync' has changed, so what was that you were saying about > getting out of date ;-)This page has a very low access rate (8.500 hits in almost 2 years). I guess it's normal that it's getting out of date faster - especially if the original writer stopped maintaining it. Regards, Marc