Sébastien Le Ray
2016-Jul-18 08:13 UTC
[Samba] Samba 4.2 extremely slow with (some) XP & Seven boxes
Hi there, After an upgrade our fileservers to samba 4.2.10 (debian package), some (but no all) of our XP and Seven boxes are extremely slow. Toggling "require strong key" to no does not help. Our DC are still 4.1.17 (debian package) Is there any known issue? Regards
kendell clark
2016-Jul-18 08:24 UTC
[Samba] Samba 4.2 extremely slow with (some) XP & Seven boxes
hi I can confirm this. I don't have any xp boxes, but my fiance has a box running windows 7, and it can take at least 30 seconds to make the initial connection, and several seconds to display the contents of the share, plus a few seconds each time you enter folders, open files, etc. Copying files is extremely slow, although I'm not certain if this is a samba issue or a problem of my network, which is running at about 100 mbps, not gigabit. Thanks Kendell Clark Sébastien Le Ray wrote:> Hi there, > > After an upgrade our fileservers to samba 4.2.10 (debian package), > some (but no all) of our XP and Seven boxes are extremely slow. > Toggling "require strong key" to no does not help. Our DC are still > 4.1.17 (debian package) > > Is there any known issue? > > Regards > >
thoralf schulze
2016-Jul-18 15:49 UTC
[Samba] Samba 4.2 extremely slow with (some) XP & Seven boxes
hi there, On 07/18/2016 10:24 AM, kendell clark wrote:> I can confirm this. […]maybe debian bug #827141 is relevant … we've seen similiar symptoms, recompiling samba and friends with the patch mentioned there restored the behaviour we got with pre-badlock 4.1.17. it boils down to winbind not re-using signed&sealed connections when pulling user information from the ad, which seems to be _really_ expensive. hth, t. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 473 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20160718/9132b968/signature.sig>