samba - Jul 2016 - questions regarding 40G Samba Server

Hi,
we expect a growth in bigger file transfers (files n*10 GB up to
multiple 100GB) on a regular base from a smaller number of users
combined with the "normal" office use with word files, mail profiles
etc
from about 500 users.

We plan a new Fileserver/Storage Head with 40Gb NICs client and storage
side.

What would be regarding to samba be of more importance: multiple Cores
or more MHz per core?

    Any suggestions? Feedback? Thanks! and regards . Götz

What shares will you be using? (NFS, CIFS, etc)

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator <
goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de> wrote:
> Hi,
> we expect a growth in bigger file transfers (files n*10 GB up to
> multiple 100GB) on a regular base from a smaller number of users
> combined with the "normal" office use with word files, mail
profiles etc
> from about 500 users.
>
> We plan a new Fileserver/Storage Head with 40Gb NICs client and storage
> side.
>
> What would be regarding to samba be of more importance: multiple Cores
> or more MHz per core?
>
>     Any suggestions? Feedback? Thanks! and regards . Götz
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>


-- 
*Sincerely,*
*Garland McAlexander*
*O: 212-271-0198*
*C: 321-315-9948*

Hi,

forgot that... CIFS and NFS. May be we split both to different servers.
One CIFS, one NFS.

    Regards . Götz


Am 13.07.16 um 08:26 schrieb Garland McAlexander:
> What shares will you be using? (NFS, CIFS, etc)
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
> <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de
> <mailto:goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>     we expect a growth in bigger file transfers (files n*10 GB up to
>     multiple 100GB) on a regular base from a smaller number of users
>     combined with the "normal" office use with word files, mail
>     profiles etc
>     from about 500 users.
>
>     We plan a new Fileserver/Storage Head with 40Gb NICs client and
>     storage
>     side.
>
>     What would be regarding to samba be of more importance: multiple Cores
>     or more MHz per core?
>
>         Any suggestions? Feedback? Thanks! and regards . Götz
>