On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 04:47 PM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:> and as extra, > Users which want to use the old samba 4.1 winbind on 4.2, need to set. > server services = +winbind, -winbinddCan anyone tell me the different between 4.1 winbind and 4.2 winbindd? Thanks
On 03/06/15 09:55, Jacky Chan wrote:> On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 04:47 PM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >> and as extra, >> Users which want to use the old samba 4.1 winbind on 4.2, need to set. >> server services = +winbind, -winbindd > Can anyone tell me the different between 4.1 winbind and 4.2 winbindd? > > Thanks'winbind' is built into the 'samba' daemon and is limited when compared with the separate 'winbindd' deamon, the 'winbindd' deamon is the same one that is used on a Member Server. Note, the wiki page IMHO is wrong! Rowland
On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 05:13 PM, Rowland Penny wrote:> On 03/06/15 09:55, Jacky Chan wrote: >> On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 04:47 PM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >>> and as extra, >>> Users which want to use the old samba 4.1 winbind on 4.2, need to set. >>> server services = +winbind, -winbindd >> Can anyone tell me the different between 4.1 winbind and 4.2 winbindd? >> >> Thanks > > 'winbind' is built into the 'samba' daemon and is limited when > compared with the separate 'winbindd' deamon, the 'winbindd' deamon is > the same one that is used on a Member Server. >If samba (/usr/sbin/samba) already built in winbind, why we need to run winbindd in AD or DC? Or is samba going to drop the built-in winbind in the future?> Note, the wiki page IMHO is wrong! >I second that> Rowland >