Reindl Harald
2015-Apr-05 12:52 UTC
[Samba] Member server - winbind unable to resolve users/groups
Am 05.04.2015 um 14:47 schrieb buhorojo:> 500 as a lower range is perfectly reasonable. Have you never heard of > /etc/login.defs?and what are you doing with already system users created before change login.defs? it's perfectly reasonable on systems which had login.defs to 500 in a early state but nowhere else, at least not as recommendation to anybody you don't know in person and where you don't be there to solve other problems which may appear after the change -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20150405/9d6dfafb/attachment.pgp>
buhorojo
2015-Apr-05 15:01 UTC
[Samba] Member server - winbind unable to resolve users/groups
On 05/04/15 14:52, Reindl Harald wrote:> > Am 05.04.2015 um 14:47 schrieb buhorojo: >> 500 as a lower range is perfectly reasonable. Have you never heard of >> /etc/login.defs? > > and what are you doing with already system users created before change > login.defs? it's perfectly reasonable on systems which had login.defs > to 500 in a early state but nowhere else, at least not as > recommendation to anybody you don't know in person and where you don't > be there to solve other problems which may appear after the change > > >We're trying to get something working. What do you suggest? The op had a usable system with the system users he had. Now he hasn't. What do you expect him to do? Spend his weekend changing permissions and ownerships on 3 million files?
Reindl Harald
2015-Apr-05 15:06 UTC
[Samba] Member server - winbind unable to resolve users/groups
Am 05.04.2015 um 17:01 schrieb buhorojo:> On 05/04/15 14:52, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 05.04.2015 um 14:47 schrieb buhorojo: >>> 500 as a lower range is perfectly reasonable. Have you never heard of >>> /etc/login.defs? >> >> and what are you doing with already system users created before change >> login.defs? it's perfectly reasonable on systems which had login.defs >> to 500 in a early state but nowhere else, at least not as >> recommendation to anybody you don't know in person and where you don't >> be there to solve other problems which may appear after the change >> > We're trying to get something working. What do you suggest? The op had a > usable system with the system users he had. Now he hasn't. What do you > expect him to do? Spend his weekend changing permissions and ownerships > on 3 million files?in doubt - yes and it won't take the whole weekend nor needs a script doing that change babysitting -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20150405/dc142cc4/attachment.pgp>