Am 25.02.2015 um 22:38 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy:> > > I had to go do something else and have returned. I discovered that I > hadn't gone back far enough. This complaint first appears here: > > ==========Enable bind gssapi and bind9_DLZ > ==============================> [....] Stopping domain name service...: bind9rndc: connect failed: > 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused > . ok > [ ok ] Starting domain name service...: bind9. > > Notice the "refused" appearance. As there is no firewall on this > machine, yet, port 953 is not blocked. > > This DC appears to operating correctly despite this. This may be a > 'bind9' issue? Or?You didn't answered my question. Have you checked via netstat, that port 953 is listening on localhost? Regards, Marc
No, I haven't but, I will. --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-02-25 15:50, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:> Am 25.02.2015 um 22:38 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy: > >> I had to go do something else and have returned. I discovered that I hadn't gone back far enough. This complaint first appears here: ==========Enable bind gssapi and bind9_DLZ =============================== [....] Stopping domain name service...: bind9rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused . ok [ ok ] Starting domain name service...: bind9. Notice the "refused" appearance. As there is no firewall on this machine, yet, port 953 is not blocked. This DC appears to operating correctly despite this. This may be a 'bind9' issue? Or? > > You didn't answered my question. Have you checked via netstat, that port > 953 is listening on localhost? > > Regards, > MarcLinks: ------ [1] http://www.donelsontrophy.com
Am 25.02.2015 um 23:39 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy:> No, I haven't but, I willwhile type that reply you could have done the command below netstat --numeric-hosts --numeric-ports --programs -u -t -l that's the first in case of connection troubles because until that confirms a service is listening the firewall is not part of the game> "Everyone deserves an award!!" > > On 2015-02-25 15:50, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > >> Am 25.02.2015 um 22:38 schrieb Bob of Donelson Trophy: >> >>> I had to go do something else and have returned. I discovered that I hadn't gone back far enough. This complaint first appears here: ==========Enable bind gssapi and bind9_DLZ =============================== [....] Stopping domain name service...: bind9rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: connection refused . ok [ ok ] Starting domain name service...: bind9. Notice the "refused" appearance. As there is no firewall on this machine, yet, port 953 is not blocked. This DC appears to operating correctly despite this. This may be a 'bind9' issue? Or? >> >> You didn't answered my question. Have you checked via netstat, that port >> 953 is listening on localhost?-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20150225/465809d4/attachment.pgp>