HI. I have been told that kerberos cannot be running while samba4 is. How do I do this? I seem to have missed this on the how-to and system requirements. I have commented out every entry in /etc/services that seems even remotely kerberosish. I still get errors on kinit and host (from the how-to). I have googled until my computers are laughing at me and have posted on every forum I can find. Help? Please? -jimc
On 04/02/15 17:04, jimc wrote:> HI. > I have been told that kerberos cannot be running while samba4 is. How > do I do this? I seem to have missed this on the how-to and system > requirements. > > I have commented out every entry in /etc/services that seems even > remotely kerberosish. I still get errors on kinit and host (from the > how-to). > > I have googled until my computers are laughing at me and have posted > on every forum I can find. > > Help? Please? > > -jimc >You probably don't have to do anything to stop kerberos before you install samba4 in AD mode, because it is unlikely to be running unless you installed it. Rowland
ps -ef | grep krb ps -ef | grep kdc Is kinit failing because it can't reach a kdc? Or is kinit failing because the user in question does not exist? On 02/06/15 10:23, Rowland Penny wrote:> On 04/02/15 17:04, jimc wrote: >> HI. >> I have been told that kerberos cannot be running while samba4 is. How >> do I do this? I seem to have missed this on the how-to and system >> requirements. >> >> I have commented out every entry in /etc/services that seems even >> remotely kerberosish. I still get errors on kinit and host (from the >> how-to). >> >> I have googled until my computers are laughing at me and have posted >> on every forum I can find. >> >> Help? Please? >> >> -jimc >> > > You probably don't have to do anything to stop kerberos before you > install samba4 in AD mode, because it is unlikely to be running unless > you installed it. > > Rowland >
*what* are you talking about? http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise * on no distribution a kerberos service is running out of the box * you don't tell us even what distribution are you using * you don't tell us the errors * you even don't tell us the how-to you are talking about Am 04.02.2015 um 18:04 schrieb jimc:> I have been told that kerberos cannot be running while samba4 is. How do > I do this? I seem to have missed this on the how-to and system > requirements. > > I have commented out every entry in /etc/services that seems even > remotely kerberosish. I still get errors on kinit and host (from the > how-to). > > I have googled until my computers are laughing at me and have posted on > every forum I can find. > > Help? Please?-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- Betreff: [Samba] Where to find a kerberos-free distro Datum: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:14:12 -0800 Von: jimc <jesmeyano at gmail.com> An: samba at lists.samba.org Y'all once told me that I should not have a kerberos server running on the same box as samba4. Where do I find such a distro? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20150206/c7fde5c8/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Reindl Harald wrote:> *what* are you talking about? > http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise > > * on no distribution a kerberos service is running > out of the box > * you don't tell us even what distribution are you using > * you don't tell us the errors > * you even don't tell us the how-to you are talking aboutAlso, /etc/services only provides service name to port mappings. This is unlikely to prevent kerberos from running, but can break apps which talk to kerberos. Since a samba AD DC provides kerberos, doing this may break things for samba, as well.