John Lewis
2015-Jan-13 11:33 UTC
[Samba] Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit ldbedt as root. I mapped to to a new attribute called gidNumber which has no specific meaning in samba. Is there any potential problems that can arise from doing that. Is there a better way to fix that problem?
Rowland Penny
2015-Jan-13 11:35 UTC
[Samba] Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote:> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I > did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit > ldbedt as root. > > I mapped to to a new attribute called gidNumber which has no specific > meaning in samba. Is there any potential problems that can arise from > doing that. Is there a better way to fix that problem? >Hmm, definitely going to need more info here, gidNumber has a specific meaning to samba, depending on how you set up samba. Rowland
John Lewis
2015-Jan-13 14:06 UTC
[Samba] Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:> On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote: >> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I >> did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit >> ldbedt as root. >> >> I mapped to to a new attribute called gidNumber which has no specific >> meaning in samba. Is there any potential problems that can arise from >> doing that. Is there a better way to fix that problem? >> > > Hmm, definitely going to need more info here, gidNumber has a specific > meaning to samba, depending on how you set up samba. > > Rowland >I took the defaults except for rfc2307 which I enabled. I am running Samba Version 4.1.11-Debian.