Hello again,
If you plan a PDC-BDC ctdb will not work.
I have a PDC-BDC failover cluster running with glusterfs, openldap, ucarp.
In theory, going the new way of samba with samba franky (samba4/samba3
merged ads) ctdb should work even in an replicating environment.
Greetings
Daniel
-----------------------------------------------
EDV Daniel M?ller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 T?bingen
Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail: mueller at tropenklinik.de
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
-----------------------------------------------
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org]
Im
Auftrag von Michael Wandel
Gesendet: Montag, 15. August 2011 10:29
An: samba at lists.samba.org
Betreff: [Samba] Samba Cluster mit High Performance
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hallo SambaML,
in the next weeks I want to setup a high perormance Cluster(2-Nodes)
with Samba on Linux. Now I have to decide which Clusterfilesystem is the
best one for this project, gfs2, ocfs, glusterfs.
If someone has experience with this, pleas give me an answer.
At the second: is it the best way to setup a active-active Cluster with
ctdb ?
Best regards
M. Wandel
m-wandel at versanet.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOSNi4AAoJEL/EwdcvY5PErgYH/RDSzboXKEQHdnI/x9mGkpjY
QPUkP+i9t7k0mDSR1THPoXJXUNyBataYtPxIxBXAhZSU0QnKJAKP3cdSEmeDw5rh
dIFORWEGcXw7qiAGlfUTr8DPOAF+bmxwFrxvelztaEG+f3bQ6mgc5aPZGtsHL7Dh
lrveFcBfsCPyV8tt1F9dYED59plFNpyHnXvimbvcDFHg9VxDjmS5CKVwlU3s9Zxq
MkTjvjB1BJmhmAwcyZrqySQbSNkB4px2G9GuMrAItgIJE0F4fuo6cx7tlT/EewG0
7vGB9bIDzCzQlkbaHjoJriNPZteCXRPQMOXXmfwfvYR82xON8HR09Joou5fqY9A=uNRs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba