Hi.
reading docs i found
THIS
pdbedit -P "minimum password age" -C 5184000 (limit for validity of
the
password set for 60 days)
pdbedit -P "maximum password age" -C 7776000 (maximum period for
validity of
the password set for 90 days)
after u set ur policies restart samba and cofirm policies/informations make
to user:
pdbedit -L -v samba_user
AND THIS
-P account-policy
Display an account policy
Valid policies are: minimum password age, reset count minutes, disconnect
time, user must logon to change password, password history, lockout
duration, min password length, maximum password age and bad lockout attempt.
i hope that helps you!
Att,
Losnak, Andr?.
---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
From: Marcelo Terres <mhterres at gmail.com>
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:02:24 -0200
Subject: [Samba] Domain account policies
Hi.
I'm using samba 3.4.3.
if I set my domain account policies with pdbedit (for example: min password
length 8, password history 4 and maximum password age 90 days), is it
possible to change this default policies for some users ?
Thanks,
Marcelo H. Terres
mhterres at gmail.com
******************************
**********
ICQ: 6649932
MSN: mhterres at hotmail.com
Jabber: mhterres at jabber.org
http://twitter.com/mhterres
http://identi.ca/mhterres
****************************************
http://mundoopensource.blogspot.com/
http://www.propus.com.br
Sent from Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
2010/2/5 <samba-request at lists.samba.org>
> Send samba mailing list submissions to
> samba at lists.samba.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> samba-request at lists.samba.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> samba-owner at lists.samba.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of samba digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Windows 7 samba domain trust relatioshiop (John Drescher)
> 2. Re: Windows 7 samba domain trust relatioshiop (John Drescher)
> 3. Re: windows 7 machine account fails to authenticate against
> samba PDC (graham)
> 4. Domain account policies (Marcelo Terres)
> 5. Claimed Zero Day exploit in Samba. (Jeremy Allison)
> 6. Re: smbpasswd issue in a migration.
> (=?us-ascii?Q?Gabriel_Burgos_Informatica?=)
> 7. using RPCS printer driver for a P&P printer (Richard Gansterer)
> 8. winbind: only domains option/patch (Julian Regel)
> 9. IPv6 name resolution problem (Ernesto Silva)
> 10. Re: 3.3 and 3.4 compile failure on dbwrap (Jeff Block)
>
>
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> From: John Drescher <drescherjm at gmail.com>
> To: samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:56:47 -0500
> Subject: [Samba] Windows 7 samba domain trust relatioshiop
> I have upgraded both my PDC and BDC to samba-3.4.5 and restarted
> samba. Then I applied the registry changes to windows 7 aslisted in
> the wiki. Anyways I joind the domain without problems but when I go to
> login I get a trust relationship error.
>
> In my eventlog I see the following:
>
> The session setup to the Windows NT or Windows 2000 Domain Controller
> \\VS_LDAP1 for the domain RADIMG failed because \\VS_LDAP1 does not
> support signing or sealing the Netlogon session. Either upgrade the
> Domain controller or set the RequireSignOrSeal registry entry on this
> machine to 0.
>
>
> \\VS_LDAP1 is the BDC if that matters. I am using a ldap domain with ssl
> off.
>
> I tried against the wiki advice to set the RequireSignOrSeal to 0 but
> that gave me a different error:
>
> This computer could not authenticate with \\VS_LDAP1, a Windows domain
> controller for domain RADIMG, and therefore this computer might deny
> logon requests. This inability to authenticate might be caused by
> another computer on the same network using the same name or the
> password for this computer account is not recognized. If this message
> appears again, contact your system administrator.
>
> Any ideas where to start.
> --
> John M. Drescher
>
>
>
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> From: John Drescher <drescherjm at gmail.com>
> To: samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:24:48 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Windows 7 samba domain trust relatioshiop
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:56 AM, John Drescher <drescherjm at
gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I have upgraded both my PDC and BDC to samba-3.4.5 and restarted
> > samba. Then I applied the registry changes to windows 7 aslisted in
> > the wiki. Anyways I joind the domain without problems but when I go to
> > login I get a trust relationship error.
> >
> > In my eventlog I see the following:
> >
> > The session setup to the Windows NT or Windows 2000 Domain Controller
> > \\VS_LDAP1 for the domain RADIMG failed because \\VS_LDAP1 does not
> > support signing or sealing the Netlogon session. Either upgrade the
> > Domain controller or set the RequireSignOrSeal registry entry on this
> > machine to 0.
> >
> >
> > \\VS_LDAP1 is the BDC if that matters. I am using a ldap domain with
ssl
> off.
> >
> > I tried against the wiki advice to set the RequireSignOrSeal to 0 but
> > that gave me a different error:
> >
> > This computer could not authenticate with \\VS_LDAP1, a Windows domain
> > controller for domain RADIMG, and therefore this computer might deny
> > logon requests. This inability to authenticate might be caused by
> > another computer on the same network using the same name or the
> > password for this computer account is not recognized. If this message
> > appears again, contact your system administrator.
> >
> > Any ideas where to start.
>
> Cancel that. User error. I forgot to restart samba on the BDC so it
> was still running the old version..
>
> --
> John M. Drescher
>
>
>
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> From: graham <graham8499 at ymail.com>
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:45:02 +0000
> Subject: Re: [Samba] windows 7 machine account fails to authenticate
> against samba PDC
> a slight change in the log entries now, as below.
> I don't know why (I don't think I've changed anything), but
there is an
> extra log entry showing the host is in the passdb, but getpwnam() is
> failing.
> However, the machine name is definitely in /etc/passwd.
> Can anyone cast any light on this apparent inconsistency, or what I might
> do to diagnose the problem further?
>
>
> [2010/02/05 17:19:16, 0]
> rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:603(_netr_ServerAuthenticate3)
> _netr_ServerAuthenticate3: netlogon_creds_server_check failed. Rejecting
> auth request from client WIN7HOST machine account WIN7HOST$
> *[2010/02/05 17:19:23, 1] auth/auth_util.c:577(make_server_info_sam)
> User WIN7HOST$ in passdb, but getpwnam() fails!*
> [2010/02/05 17:19:23, 0] auth/auth_sam.c:355(check_sam_security)
> check_sam_security: make_server_info_sam() failed with
> 'NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER'
>
>
>
>
>
> graham wrote on 03/02/2010 17:09:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I've added my windows7 client to the domain (samba running as pdc),
>> having applied the registry changes identified here
>> (http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7).
>>
>> Partial success - domain users can login and see shares etc, BUT:
>>
>> 1 - the registry settings in ntlogon/NTConfig.POL are not applied. Am I
>> right in thinking that windows 7 ignores this policy?
>> And if so I therefore need to put the appropriate registry settings
into
>> a logon script?
>>
>>
>> 2 - every time a domain user logs in to the windows7 host smbd reports
>> an error:
>>
>> [2010/02/02 19:07:51, 0]
>> rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:603(_netr_ServerAuthenticate3)
>> _netr_ServerAuthenticate3: netlogon_creds_server_check failed.
Rejecting
>> auth request from client WIN7HOST machine account WIN7HOST$
>> [2010/02/02 19:07:52, 0] auth/auth_sam.c:355(check_sam_security)
>> check_sam_security: make_server_info_sam() failed with
>> 'NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER'
>>
>> This only occurs for the windows7 client (not XP clients).
>> What does this mean, is it a problem, and how do I fix it?!
>>
>>
>> 3 - periodic errors reported by nmbd:
>> Packet send failed to 192.168.10.8(138) ERRNO=Operation not permitted
>>
>> That's the ipaddress of the windows7 client.
>> Actually, looking back in the logs I see this has occasionally happened
>> for all but one of the xp clients too.
>> Again, what does this error mean, is it a problem, how would I fix it?
>>
>>
>> 4 - windows7 client bombards the server on port 389 (ldap)
>> No idea why, no other (xp) clients do this. I'm guessing it /might/
be
>> part of question 2 above ,ie. maybe the win7 client is trying to
>> authenticate against ldap??
>>
>> rgds all,
>> graham.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> From: Marcelo Terres <mhterres at gmail.com>
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:02:24 -0200
> Subject: [Samba] Domain account policies
> Hi.
>
> I'm using samba 3.4.3.
>
> if I set my domain account policies with pdbedit (for example: min password
> length 8, password history 4 and maximum password age 90 days), is it
> possible to change this default policies for some users ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marcelo H. Terres
> mhterres at gmail.com
> ****************************************
> ICQ: 6649932
> MSN: mhterres at hotmail.com
> Jabber: mhterres at jabber.org
> http://twitter.com/mhterres
> http://identi.ca/mhterres
> ****************************************
> http://mundoopensource.blogspot.com/
> http://www.propus.com.br
> Sent from Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
>
>
>
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> From: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> To: samba at samba.org, samba-technical at samba.org, samba-announce at
samba.org
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:17:22 -0800
> Subject: [Samba] Claimed Zero Day exploit in Samba.
> Claimed Zero Day exploit in Samba.
>
> A user named "kcopedarookie" posted what they claim to
> be a video of a zero-day exploit in Samba on youtube
> yesterday here:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NN50RtZ2N74&aia=true
>
> The video shows modifications to smbclient allowing
> /etc/passwd to be downloaded from a remote server.
>
> The issue is actually a default insecure configuration
> in Samba.
>
> Quick FAQ: What do I do !
> -------------------------
>
> Set:
>
> wide links = no
>
> in the [global] section of your smb.conf and restart
> smbd to eliminate this problem.
>
> Longer FAQ: The real issue
> --------------------------
>
> The problem comes from a combination of two features in
> Samba, each of which on their own are useful to Administrators,
> but in combination allow users to access any file on the system
> that their logged in username has permissions to read (this is
> not a privilege escalation problem).
>
> By default Samba ships with the parameter "wide links = yes",
> which allows Administrators to locally (on the server) add
> a symbolic link inside an exported share which SMB/CIFS clients
> will follow.
>
> As an example, given a share definition:
>
> [tmp]
> path = /tmp
> read only = no
> guest ok = yes
>
> The administrator could add a symlink:
>
> $ ln -s /etc/passwd /tmp/passwd
>
> and SMB/CIFS clients would then see a file called "passwd"
> within the [tmp] share that could be read and would allow
> clients to read /etc/passwd.
>
> If the "wide links" parameter is set to "no", any
attempt
> to read this file will fail with an "access denied" error.
>
> The problem occurs as Samba allows clients using the UNIX
> extensions (which are also turned on by default) to create
> symlinks on remotely mounted shares on which they have write
> access that point to any path on the file system.
>
> This is by design, as applications running on UNIX clients
> may have good reasons to create symlinks anywhere on the
> filesystem they have write access that point to local files
> (such as /etc/passwd).
>
> UNIX clients will resolve these links locally, but Windows
> clients will resolve them on the server. It is this combination
> that causes the problem.
>
> All future versions of Samba will have the parameter
> "wide links" set to "no" by default, and the manual
> pages will be updated to explain this issue.
>
>
>
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> From: "Gabriel Burgos Informatica" <gabrielburgos.informatica
at gmail.com>
> To: <helmut at hullen.de>, <samba at lists.samba.org>
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 00:48:17 -0300
> Subject: Re: [Samba] smbpasswd issue in a migration.
> Hi, thank you for answer, in the new server tells (8.04),
>
> root at server:~# which -a smbpasswd
> /usr/bin/smbpasswd
>
> root at server:~# ls -l /usr/bin/smbpasswd
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1307112 2007-02-05 22:14 /usr/bin/smbpasswd
>
> In the ubuntu 5.10 (original server),
>
>
> root at sever:~# which -a smbpasswd
> /usr/bin/smbpasswd
> /usr/bin/X11/smbpasswd
>
> root at sever:~# ls -l /usr/bin/smbpasswd
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1307112 2007-02-05 22:15 /usr/bin/smbpasswd
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> g.
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at
lists.samba.org]
> En
> nombre de Helmut Hullen
> Enviado el: viernes, 05 de febrero de 2010 04:10 a.m.
> Para: samba at lists.samba.org
> Asunto: Re: [Samba] smbpasswd issue in a migration.
>
> Hallo, Gabriel,
>
> Du meintest am 04.02.10:
>
> > My problem is when I try to change an user?s password. To change from
> > the original server a password I use the command smbpasswd ?user? and
> > it works; but when I try to do the same in the new server I get this
> > error bash: /usr/bin/smbpasswd no such file or directory exist.
>
> What tells
>
> which -a smbpasswd
> ls -l /usr/bin/smbpasswd
>
>
> > I try to change the password with passwd but then it doesn?t allow me
> > to log on a windows?s terminal with the new password.
>
> That's simple: "passwd" changes (only) the Linux password,
and
> "smbpasswd" only changes the Samba password.
>
> Viele Gruesse!
> Helmut
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> From: Richard Gansterer <richard.gansterer at paradigma.net>
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:38:57 +0100
> Subject: [Samba] using RPCS printer driver for a P&P printer
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has had experience with using RPCS printer
> drivers in a P&P printer share.
> Installing the driver onto samba went without a problem (followed the
> Samba howto "chapter 21: Add Printer Wizard Driver
Installation") but
> after that, every time i try to access the printer properties
> it takes sometimes minutes to open or just doesn't come up at all (same
> behavior when i open the properties locally on the installed printer or
> directly on the server as a printer admin). So i either can't
> set up any default printer properties or it takes so long that its not
> worth the waiting time (if the properties windows shows up, every action
> i do in there will also have such a long delay).
>
> I can't find any error/denied or similar messages (or simply smth that
> would stand out of the usual) in the log files (loglevel 3). I can
> install the drivers on the
> WS by hand and use samba just for the printer queue fine (per-machine
> printer). But since i will have to install more printers i wanted to use
> the point&print method since it saves a lot of hassle.
>
> The printer is a NRG DSc424 and im using Windows XP. The same thing
> works fine with the official PCL6 drivers and i might have to settle for
> that in the end but the RPCS drivers give a better quality.
> It's not a permission problem either, using either root or a user with
> the SePrintOperatorPrivilege right (also it would probably show up in
> the log files otherwise).
>
> If anyone knows what the cause for those delays might be (even if its
> just that RPCS is simply slow in combination with samba) i'd be really
> happy to know. :)
>
> Thanks
> Richard
>
>
>
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> From: Julian Regel <julian.regel at yahoo.co.uk>
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:26:20 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: [Samba] winbind: only domains option/patch
> Hi.
>
> In January 2009 a patch was sent to this list that introduced the
"winbind:
> only domains" option to smb.conf (
> http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-January/062706.html).
> This provides the inverse of "winbind: ignore domains" and the
creator of
> the patch explained that this was more useful (to him) that having to
> explicitly exclude domains.
>
> Can anyone confirm if this patch was accepted, and if so, what version of
> Samba supports winbind: only domains?
>
> If the patch has not been accepted, is there a particular reason why not?
>
> Thanks
>
> JR
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> From: Ernesto Silva <erniesilva at gmail.com>
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 16:40:40 -0200
> Subject: [Samba] IPv6 name resolution problem
> Hi, I'm trying to set up a small network over IPv6. It will have IPv4
too
> but the dhcp server may not work and Ubuntu (9.04) automatically configure
> a
> .local domain IPv6 addresses, so I must run the samba server and clients
> over IPv6.
>
> Only one machine will act as a server, but samba is up and running in all
> of
> them.
>
> The problem is that smbclient can't resolve the server's name, my
probes
> from the client follows:
>
> ping6 -Ieth0 ipv6_server_address works fine
> smbclient -L ::1 works fine
> smbclient -L ipv6_client_address works fine
> smbclient -L client_name.local fails with NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
>
> smbclient -L ipv6_server_address fails with NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE
> smbclient -L server_name.local fails with NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
>
> As I mentioned both client and server IPv6 addresses are in local scope:
> fe80:0:0:0:x:x:x:x/64
>
> I'm also using avahi-daemon with IPv6 enabled and my nsswitch.conf
host's
> line is:
>
> hosts: files mdns_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] mdns dns
>
> An strace reveals this: RESOLVE-HOSTNAME-IPV4, but not IPV6 apparently.
>
> Any ideas?
> Best regards,
> Ernesto.
>
>
>
> ---------- Mensagem encaminhada ----------
> From: "Jeff Block" <Jeff.Block at radiology.ucsf.edu>
> To: samba at lists.samba.org
> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:47:47 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Samba] 3.3 and 3.4 compile failure on dbwrap
> On 2/5/10 6:23 AM, "Gaiseric Vandal" <gaiseric.vandal at
gmail.com> wrote:
> > I also have problems using this gcc bundled with the Sun freeware
tools
> > (/usr/sfw/bin/gcc.) I had more luck with using gcc from
> > sunfreeware.com. In hindsight I think it may have just been a matter
> > of setting CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS correctly. You may also find that
the
> > samba build on sunfreeware meets your needs. (zfs support seems
lacking
> > - which shouldn't matter for solaris 9, and you may still need to
> > compile the nss_winbind modules.)
> >
> > I also installed OpenLDAP from Sunfreeware.com. The Solaris native
ldap
> > client does not seem to have full functionality for Active Directory
> > support (may not be an issue for you.) I think Sun compiles Samba
> > using a Mozilla LDAP SDK.
> >
> > This is how I ended up compiling Samba using Sunfreeware GCC.
> >
> > #PATH=/usr/swf/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:$PATH
> > #PATH=/usr/local/samba-3.4.5/bin:/usr/local/samba-3.4.5/sbin:$PATH
> > #LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/sfw/lib:/usr/ccs/lib:$LD_LIBRARY PATH
> > #LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/samba-3.4.5:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> > #export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> >
> > #export CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/ssl/include
> > -I/usr/include"
> > #export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -R/usr/local/ssl/lib
> > -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib -R/usr/lib"
> >
> > #./configure --prefix=/usr/local/samba-3.4.5
> > --with-shared-modules=vfs_zfsacl
> > --with-privatedir=/etc/samba/private --with-lockdir=/var/samba/locks
> > --with-configdir=/etc/samba --enable-nss-wrapper
> >
> > #make
> > #make install
> >
> > I think I may need to have manually copied nss_winbind.so.1 file to
> > /usr/local/samba-3.4.5/lib
> >
> >
> > On 02/04/10 17:51, Jeff Block wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm having problems compiling a newer version of samba (3.3.x
or 3.4.x)
> on
> >> solaris 9. We are currently running 3.0.23d and have been putting
off
> >> upgrading for far to long.
> >>
> >> I've tried gcc and sun studio 12 cc with the same issues when
it comes
> to
> >> compiling dbwrap.c. I can't seem to find anything on google
that's
> related
> >> to my issue.
> >>
> >> Here's my configure line when using gcc:
> >>
> >> ./configure --prefix=/netopt --with-automount \
> >> --with-configdir=/usr/local/samba --localstatedir=/var/log/samba \
> >> --infodir=/netopt/share/info --mandir=/netopt/share/man \
> >> --with-privatedir=/usr/local/samba/private --with-krb5=/netopt \
> >> --with-libiconv=/netopt --with-utmp --with-winbind CC=gcc \
> >> CFLAGS='-I/netopt/include' LD=gcc
LDFLAGS='-L/netopt/lib -R/netopt/lib'
> \
> >> --with-syslog-facility=local7
> >>
>
> >> When it finally gets to compiling dbwrap.c, here's what I see:
> >>
> >> Compiling lib/dbwrap.c
> >> lib/dbwrap.c:58:46: macro "fetch" passed 4 arguments,
but takes just 1
> >> lib/dbwrap.c: In function `dbwrap_fallback_parse_record':
> >> lib/dbwrap.c:58: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer
without
> a
> >> cast
> >> lib/dbwrap.c:186:38: macro "store" passed 3 arguments,
but takes just 2
> >> lib/dbwrap.c: In function `dbwrap_store':
> >> lib/dbwrap.c:186: error: incompatible types in assignment
> >> lib/dbwrap.c:196:41: macro "fetch" passed 4 arguments,
but takes just 1
> >> lib/dbwrap.c: In function `dbwrap_fetch':
> >> lib/dbwrap.c:196: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
> >> The following command failed:
> >> gcc -I../lib/zlib -I/netopt/include -I/netopt/include -I.
> >> -I/opt/src/freeware/samba-3.4.5/source3
> >> -I/opt/src/freeware/samba-3.4.5/source3/iniparser/src -Iinclude
> -I./include
> >> -I. -I. -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/talloc -I./../lib/tevent
> >> -I./../lib/tdb/include -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./..
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> >> -I/netopt/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT
> -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> >> -I/netopt/include -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -DSUNOS5
> >> -I/opt/src/freeware/samba-3.4.5/source3/lib -I.. -I../source4
> >> -D_SAMBA_BUILD_=3 -D_SAMBA_BUILD_=3 -fPIC -c lib/dbwrap.c -o
> lib/dbwrap.o
> >> make: *** [lib/dbwrap.o] Error 1
> >>
> >>
> Thanks for the advice, but unfortunately I'm still having problems.
>
> I am using a compiled version of gcc (3.4.3).
>
> My LDFLAGS and CFLAGS are:
> CFLAGS='-I/netopt/include' LDFLAGS='-L/netopt/lib
-R/netopt/lib'
> This is generally what I use as /netopt is basically our /usr/local.
I'm
> not sure why /usr/lib would need to be added here. Isn't that just
> implied?
>
> I added --enable-nss-wrapper and made sure that ssl libs could be found
> (which you specifically added to your FLAGS) but I'm still getting a
> failure
> on dbwrap.c.
>
> I'm wondering if there is some lib or something that needs to be
updated on
> my end. But, I'm not sure how to determine what that is.
>
> Thanks for any further help on this.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> samba mailing list
> samba at lists.samba.org
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
>
