Hi,
Just a quick question:
is it normal to have 101 nmbd processes running on a relatively small Win2k
network (about 7 clients)?
Everything seems to work OK (except for the oplock break request and
Outlook problems I reported earlier).
Thanks,
--
Jurjen Oskam * http://www.stupendous.org/ for PGP key * Q265230
9:02am up 5 days, 14:08, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Jurjen Oskam wrote:> > Hi, > > Just a quick question: > > is it normal to have 101 nmbd processes running on a relatively small Win2k > network (about 7 clients)?No. Nmbd doesn't do a per-client fork(), so there should only ever be one process... I think somthing is broken... Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett abartlet@pcug.org.au Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team abartlet@samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College abartlet@hawkerc.net http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Hi All! How do this problem solve? I am using samba 2.2.2-2 from Debian. Do upgrade of samba solve this problem? Thanks.
Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2002 20:43 schrieb Petrov M.I.:> How do this problem solve? > I am using samba 2.2.2-2 from Debian. > Do upgrade of samba solve this problem?Hi! Look if you have a TCP/IP-superserver (inetd, xinetd) running and if nmbd is started by this server. If yes, start nmbd as standalone-server and disable the nmbd-entry in the superserver. Greetz Jan