samba - Dec 1999 - Supplied buffer too small in API command

I've searched around throught the documentation, but I can't find 
anything relating to the error message "Supplied buffer too small in 
API command".  I have SAMBA installed on seven HP 9000 boxes running 
HP_UX 10.20, and they are working fine.  I installed SAMBA on another 
box yesterday using a cloned smb.conf file, and now I can't connect 
from Windows 95 to the new box. I try doing the connect by a "find 
computer", then map the drive.  I ran a testparm for the smb.conf and 
everything looks good.

Here is a chunk of the log file, that seems to be relevant to the 
error.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
chdir to /u04/samba/samba-1.9.18p10/source
1999/12/10 14:04:08 jpapa (10.15.2.162) connect to service IPC$ as 
user sjgp (uid=119,gid=3) (pid 26649)
1999/12/10 14:04:08 tconX service=ipc$ user=sjgp cnum=113
1999/12/10 14:04:08 Transaction 3 of length 99
switch message SMBtrans (pid 26649)
chdir to /tmp
trans <\PIPE\LANMAN> data=0 params=19 setup=0
named pipe command on <LANMAN> name
Got API command 63 of form <WrLh> <zzzBBzz> 
(tdscnt=0,tpscnt=19,mdrcnt=91,mprcnt=6)
Doing NetWkstaGetInfo
Supplied buffer too small in API command
1999/12/10 14:04:10 Transaction 4 of length 39
switch message SMBtdis (pid 26649)
chdir to /u04/samba/samba-1.9.18p10/source
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Can anyone point me in the right direction??


jpapa@minolta.com

Hi,
If the version of Samba is identical to the versions on your other HP-UX 10.20 
boxes, AND the smb.conf file was cloned from one of the other hp-ux boxes, the 
problem MIGHT be in the automatic shares, etc. that are shared out on your 
machine;  The api that you are getting the error on is the one that would be 
used to get information about the server, and perhaps the amount of information 
that needs to be returned for this particular server is greater than the max 
buffer size the api can accept.  Try doing an smbclient -L <badservername>
and
smbclient -L <workingservername>  from one of the working 10.20 boxes and
see
if you can spot any large differneces in the data returned....
Sorry, I don't have the old 1.9xxx code downloaded onto my system, so
I'm just
guessing.
Don