the dsl branch--what''s it''s purpose again? Is its end goal to be to have the functionality of the master branch currently, I assume? [kind of a rewrite of the rake tasks]? Thanks. -=r
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack at gmail.com> wrote:> the dsl branch--what''s it''s purpose again? ?Is its end goal to be to > have the functionality of the master branch currently, I assume? [kind > of a rewrite of the rake tasks]? > Thanks.Hmn, the DSL branch is the rewrite of the rake task to workaround the limiration currently presented. http://blog.mmediasys.com/2009/02/07/building-ruby-stories-the-background/ and the explanation: http://blog.mmediasys.com/2009/02/07/building-ruby-creating-packages/ Is a working in progress and I need to push the latest changes I have locally. Cheers, -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exup?ry
> Is a working in progress and I need to push the latest changes I have locally.Sounds good. As a note I did see a few mingw related recipes at http://github.com/janneke/gub/tree/d300719be162c60d12007369117f8bfd0c85ed1f/gub/specs I almost wonder if there''s not a way to hook into cygwin''s repositories to create a more generic build system. Like http://donc.wordpress.com/2006/08/04/apt-for-cygwin/ or http://stephenjungels.com/jungels.net/projects/apt-cyg/ But then again, I suppose we already know how to build the dependencies [except tcl/tk -- any volunteers to add them?] so our recipes are probably good enough. Thoughts? -=r