Hongyi Zhao
2015-Apr-18 04:58 UTC
Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 00:39:42 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I still don't see an output from rsync --itemize-changes with an A/B > difference.What do you mean by saying the above things? Do you mean only the `--itemize-changes' is enough for my case? Or Do you want to see the output from my case of running on the different rsync options? Regards -- .: Hongyi Zhao [ hongyi.zhao AT gmail.com ] Free as in Freedom :.
Kevin Korb
2015-Apr-18 05:10 UTC
Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I mean that a listing of a /path/to/filename is utterly useless. - --itemize-changes specifies why a particular /path/to/filename is listed.It also describes what will happen to that file. All in a very short string of characters. Simply put, --itemize-changes is so determinative that every second you resist using it is evidence that you are falsifying a nonsensical problem with rsync. On 04/18/2015 12:58 AM, Hongyi Zhao wrote:> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 00:39:42 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> I still don't see an output from rsync --itemize-changes with an >> A/B difference. > > What do you mean by saying the above things? > > Do you mean only the `--itemize-changes' is enough for my case? > > Or > > Do you want to see the output from my case of running on the > different rsync options? > > Regards >- -- ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ Kevin Korb Phone: (407) 252-6853 Systems Administrator Internet: FutureQuest, Inc. Kevin at FutureQuest.net (work) Orlando, Florida kmk at sanitarium.net (personal) Web page: http://www.sanitarium.net/ PGP public key available on web site. ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlUx51EACgkQVKC1jlbQAQcfcwCgpZgRJkt7dMPVVflrLdw89C0b t+IAn2lEgkE32tOmPWecOSVX1FsDXycg =kHmo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hongyi Zhao
2015-Apr-18 05:16 UTC
Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 01:10:41 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I mean that a listing of a /path/to/filename is utterly useless. > - --itemize-changes specifies why a particular /path/to/filename is > listed.It also describes what will happen to that file. All in a very > short string of characters. > > Simply put, --itemize-changes is so determinative that every second you > resist using it is evidence that you are falsifying a nonsensical > problem with rsync.Got it, thanks a lot. Regards -- .: Hongyi Zhao [ hongyi.zhao AT gmail.com ] Free as in Freedom :.
Maybe Matching Threads
- Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
- Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
- Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
- Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.
- Skip based on checksum not worked as expected when using with complex filter rules.