samba-bugs at samba.org
2015-Jan-26 23:06 UTC
[Bug 11075] New: Shouldn't --inplace fail immediately if it can't make files?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11075
Bug ID: 11075
Summary: Shouldn't --inplace fail immediately if it can't
make
files?
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
Reporter: rlpowell at digitalkingdom.org
QA Contact: rsync-qa at samba.org
20GiB file transfer with --inplace fails, consistently, *after* the transfer is
complete:
rlpowell at ip-10-0-1-16> rsync -aPv --inplace
~/scratch/acs_dump_70_immuneatlas.acs
10.0.11.249:/data/cytobank/acs_dump_70_immuneatlas.acs
sending incremental file list
acs_dump_70_immuneatlas.acs
20,465,505,293 100% 60.10MB/s 0:05:24 (xfr#1, to-chk=0/1)
rsync: open "/data/cytobank/acs_dump_70_immuneatlas.acs" failed:
Permission
denied (13)
sent 20,470,501,873 bytes received 127 bytes 62,889,407.07 bytes/sec
total size is 20,465,505,293 speedup is 1.00
rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code
23) at main.c(1165) [sender=3.1.0]
rlpowell at ip-10-0-1-16>
The file it's saying it can't open doesn't exist at all, and rsync
can't, in
fact, create a file there.
So what was it doing for that 5 minutes? Where did the 20GiB of data *go*?
I would expect --inplace to immediately try to make the file, and immediately
fail.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2015-Feb-11 04:23 UTC
[Bug 11075] Shouldn't --inplace fail immediately if it can't make files?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11075 --- Comment #1 from Robin Powell <rlpowell at digitalkingdom.org> --- Apparently it's not just --inplace?? rlpowell at flowcytech01> rsync -aPv /data/cytobank/Data/experiments/1/1053/experiment_11053/attachments/attachment_24023_RightCells150Clusters5%Downsampling.zip shell01:/var/www/special/attachment_24023_RightCells150Clusters5%Downsampling.zip rlpowell at shell01's password: sending incremental file list attachment_24023_RightCells150Clusters5%Downsampling.zip 18455631835 100% 2.43MB/s 2:00:36 (xfer#1, to-check=0/1) rsync: mkstemp "/var/www/special/.attachment_24023_RightCells150Clusters5%Downsampling.zip.jCvdjG" failed: Permission denied (13) sent 18457884862 bytes received 31 bytes 2548551.59 bytes/sec total size is 18455631835 speedup is 1.00 rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1039) [sender=3.0.6] So after *two hours* it finally noticed that it *wasn't writing to disk*?? How does that work? That seems *really* bad! I don't think rsync used to work like this?? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Seemingly Similar Threads
- rsync: [sender] read errors mapping "file" : Input/output error (5)
- smbfs linux 2.4.24; connection loss causes total machine hang
- rsync: [sender] read errors mapping "file" : Input/output error (5)
- Re: rsync: [sender] read errors mapping "file" : Input/output error (5)
- puppetmasterd continuously consuming high CPU, with many interrupts