samba-bugs@samba.org
2007-Jun-26 17:13 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4745] New: Use lchmod and lutimes whenever possible
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4745
Summary: Use lchmod and lutimes whenever possible
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: hashproduct+rsync@gmail.com
QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org
Currently, on systems that support lchmod and lutimes, rsync uses them only
when it needs to manipulate a symlink. I think it should use them everywhere
in place of chmod and utimes to avoid surprises or vulnerabilities should a
destination file of another type be suddenly replaced by a symlink.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
samba-bugs at samba.org
2009-Dec-31 22:12 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4745] Use lchmod and lutimes whenever possible
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4745
wayned at samba.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Version|3.0.0 |3.1.0
------- Comment #1 from wayned at samba.org 2009-12-31 16:12 CST -------
3.1.0 will always use lchmod() and lutimes() (when available), as you suggest.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Reasonably Related Threads
- [Bug 2913] rsync of symlinks on >=bsd needs lutimes(2) and lchmod(2)
- [Bug 2913] New: rsync of symlinks on >=bsd needs lutimes(2) and lchmod(2)
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7621] New: Special handling of lutimes ENOSYS failures does not work as intended
- lchmod for osx (was: Symlinks in OS X (10.4.1))
- DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4977] New: rsync: failed to set times on