I am a big fan of rsync, but the more I use it, the more I become frustrated at rsync's asymetrical functionality. For instance, I can do this: rsync /A/ /B/ desthost:/AB but not this: rsync srchost:/A/ srchost:/B/ /AB (The real usefulness for me comes from using the --delete flag with those commands.) Ideally, it would be great if the rsync usage read: rsync [OPTION]... SRC [SRC]... [USER@]HOST:DEST rsync [OPTION]... [USER@]HOST:SRC [[USER@]HOST:SRC]... DEST rsync [OPTION]... SRC [SRC]... DEST rsync [OPTION]... [USER@]HOST::SRC [[USER@]HOST::SRC]... [DEST] rsync [OPTION]... SRC [SRC]... [USER@]HOST::DEST rsync [OPTION]... rsync://[USER@]HOST[:PORT]/SRC [rsync://[USER@]HOST[:PORT]/SRC]... [DEST] Any thoughts? Thanks. Greg
I am a big fan of rsync, but the more I use it, the more I become frustrated at rsync's asymetrical functionality. For instance, I can do this: rsync /A/ /B/ desthost:/AB but not this: rsync srchost:/A/ srchost:/B/ /AB (The real usefulness for me comes from using the --delete flag with those commands.) Ideally, it would be great if the rsync usage read: rsync [OPTION]... SRC [SRC]... [USER@]HOST:DEST rsync [OPTION]... [USER@]HOST:SRC [[USER@]HOST:SRC]... DEST rsync [OPTION]... SRC [SRC]... DEST rsync [OPTION]... [USER@]HOST::SRC [[USER@]HOST::SRC]... [DEST] rsync [OPTION]... SRC [SRC]... [USER@]HOST::DEST rsync [OPTION]... rsync://[USER@]HOST[:PORT]/SRC [rsync://[USER@]HOST[:PORT]/SRC]... [DEST] Any thoughts? Thanks. Greg