rspec users - Mar 2012 - Request for comments: additional new expectation syntax

I''ve opened a pull request with an initial implementation of using
`expect` to set normal expectations in addition to block ones:

expect(something).to be_awesome

Note that it''s not simply the syntax change that''s driving the
possibility of introducing this.  It''s the fact that the `should` and
`should_not` syntax has occasionally been prone to problems that the
`expect` syntax would avoid entirely.

It''d be great to get feedback from other RSpec users about this.
Here''s the pull request:

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/119

Please leave comments there.  I don''t often have time to keep up with
the rspec mailing list so I likely won''t see comments here.