Is rSpec 2.0 going to be covered at all in the rSpec book, I''m expecting delivery of the book as soon as it goes to print, so just curious. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Stuart Corbishley <lists at ruby-forum.com> wrote:> Is rSpec 2.0 going to be covered at all in the rSpec book, I''m expecting > delivery of the book as soon as it goes to print, so just curious.Unfortunately, no. To cover rspec-2 in the book we''d have to push back delivery by a few months, which is a non-option at this point. The good news is that the differences are mostly internal, so all the examples that don''t pertain to extending the internals will still work.
David Chelimsky wrote:> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Stuart Corbishley <lists at ruby-forum.com> > wrote: >> Is rSpec 2.0 going to be covered at all in the rSpec book, I''m expecting >> delivery of the book as soon as it goes to print, so just curious. > > Unfortunately, no. To cover rspec-2 in the book we''d have to push back > delivery by a few months, which is a non-option at this point. > > The good news is that the differences are mostly internal, so all the > examples that don''t pertain to extending the internals will still > work.Ok great! Looking forward to the book! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.