rspec users - Nov 2009 - Error executing specs using Ruby 1.9.1p243 and RSpec 1.2.9

Hi, ''rake spec'' failed to run on Ruby 1.9.1p243 and RSpec
1.2.9.  I''m
getting the following error message when I run the specs:

/opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/spec/spec/runner/
option_parser_spec.rb:21:in `block (2 levels) in <top
(required)>'':
wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) (ArgumentError)

After analyzing the error message, it appears that "use_fakefs" method
on lines 21 and 522 of the

option_parser_spec.rb

should take an argument.

-Conrad

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Conrad Taylor <conradwt at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi, ''rake spec'' failed to run on Ruby 1.9.1p243 and RSpec
1.2.9.

Hi Conrad,

If this was a problem in the gem, it is now fixed:

$ rvm 1.9.1
$ which ruby
/Users/david/.rvm/ruby-1.9.1-p243/bin/ruby
$ rake spec
...
1522 examples, 0 failures, 2 pending

Cheers,
David

> I''m
> getting the following error message when I run the specs:
>
> /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/spec/spec/runner/
> option_parser_spec.rb:21:in `block (2 levels) in <top
(required)>'':
> wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) (ArgumentError)
>
> After analyzing the error message, it appears that "use_fakefs"
method
> on lines 21 and 522 of the
>
> option_parser_spec.rb
>
> should take an argument.
>
> -Conrad
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20091104/97718572/attachment-0001.html>

David, I''m still seeing the issue.  Thus, here''s a transcript
of my
activity:

http://pastie.org/688639

-Conrad

On Nov 4, 2:28?pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Hi, ''rake spec'' failed to run on Ruby 1.9.1p243 and
RSpec 1.2.9.
>
> Hi Conrad,
>
> If this was a problem in the gem, it is now fixed:
>
> $ rvm 1.9.1
> $ which ruby
> /Users/david/.rvm/ruby-1.9.1-p243/bin/ruby
> $ rake spec
> ...
> 1522 examples, 0 failures, 2 pending
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
>
>
> > I''m
> > getting the following error message when I run the specs:
>
> > /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/spec/spec/runner/
> > option_parser_spec.rb:21:in `block (2 levels) in <top
(required)>'':
> > wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) (ArgumentError)
>
> > After analyzing the error message, it appears that
"use_fakefs" method
> > on lines 21 and 522 of the
>
> > option_parser_spec.rb
>
> > should take an argument.
>
> > -Conrad
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Conrad Taylor <conradwt at gmail.com>
wrote:
> David, I''m still seeing the issue.  Thus, here''s a
transcript of my
> activity:
>
> http://pastie.org/688639

$ gem which fakefs
(checking gem bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1 for fakefs)
/Users/david/.rvm/gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1/lib/fakefs.rb

What version of fakefs are you using?

>
>
> -Conrad
>
> On Nov 4, 2:28 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra... at
gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > Hi, ''rake spec'' failed to run on Ruby 1.9.1p243
and RSpec 1.2.9.
> >
> > Hi Conrad,
> >
> > If this was a problem in the gem, it is now fixed:
> >
> > $ rvm 1.9.1
> > $ which ruby
> > /Users/david/.rvm/ruby-1.9.1-p243/bin/ruby
> > $ rake spec
> > ...
> > 1522 examples, 0 failures, 2 pending
> >
> > Cheers,
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> > > I''m
> > > getting the following error message when I run the specs:
> >
> > > /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/spec/spec/runner/
> > > option_parser_spec.rb:21:in `block (2 levels) in <top
(required)>'':
> > > wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) (ArgumentError)
> >
> > > After analyzing the error message, it appears that
"use_fakefs" method
> > > on lines 21 and 522 of the
> >
> > > option_parser_spec.rb
> >
> > > should take an argument.
> >
> > > -Conrad
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> > >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://
> rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20091108/ae00690a/attachment.html>

The syntax for use_fakefs changed in version 0.2.1 and the fixtures
for rspec are generating errors, but it can be solved easily.
Have to change ...
describe "smth" do
   extend FakeFS::SpecHelpers
   use_fakefs
   ...
end
To...
extend FakeFS::SpecHelpers
use_fakefs describe "smth" do ... end

As it seems the use_fakefs method now takes the describe block as a
parameter and thus the error regarding the wrong number of parameters.


On Nov 8, 3:30?pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > David, I''m still seeing the issue. ?Thus, here''s a
transcript of my
> > activity:
>
> >http://pastie.org/688639
>
> $ gem which fakefs
> (checking gem bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1 for fakefs)
> /Users/david/.rvm/gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1/lib/fakefs.rb
>
> What version of fakefs are you using?
>
>
>
> > -Conrad
>
> > On Nov 4, 2:28 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra... at
gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi, ''rake spec'' failed to run on Ruby
1.9.1p243 and RSpec 1.2.9.
>
> > > Hi Conrad,
>
> > > If this was a problem in the gem, it is now fixed:
>
> > > $ rvm 1.9.1
> > > $ which ruby
> > > /Users/david/.rvm/ruby-1.9.1-p243/bin/ruby
> > > $ rake spec
> > > ...
> > > 1522 examples, 0 failures, 2 pending
>
> > > Cheers,
> > > David
>
> > > > I''m
> > > > getting the following error message when I run the specs:
>
> > > >
/opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/spec/spec/runner/
> > > > option_parser_spec.rb:21:in `block (2 levels) in <top
(required)>'':
> > > > wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) (ArgumentError)
>
> > > > After analyzing the error message, it appears that
"use_fakefs" method
> > > > on lines 21 and 522 of the
>
> > > > option_parser_spec.rb
>
> > > > should take an argument.
>
> > > > -Conrad
>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > > rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> > > >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://
> > rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Bogdan Dumitru <dumbogdan at gmail.com>
wrote:
> The syntax for use_fakefs changed in version 0.2.1 and the fixtures
> for rspec are generating errors, but it can be solved easily.
> Have to change ...
> describe "smth" do
>   extend FakeFS::SpecHelpers
>   use_fakefs
>   ...
> end
> To...
> extend FakeFS::SpecHelpers
> use_fakefs describe "smth" do ... end
>
> As it seems the use_fakefs method now takes the describe block as a
> parameter and thus the error regarding the wrong number of parameters.
>
I had to do this slightly differently, but got it to work with fakefs-0.2.1.
Fixed in git.

Cheers,
David

>
>
> On Nov 8, 3:30 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra... at
gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > David, I''m still seeing the issue.  Thus,
here''s a transcript of my
> > > activity:
> >
> > >http://pastie.org/688639
> >
> > $ gem which fakefs
> > (checking gem bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1 for fakefs)
> >
> /Users/david/.rvm/gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1/lib/fakefs.rb
> >
> > What version of fakefs are you using?
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Conrad
> >
> > > On Nov 4, 2:28 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at
gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra...
at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi, ''rake spec'' failed to run on Ruby
1.9.1p243 and RSpec 1.2.9.
> >
> > > > Hi Conrad,
> >
> > > > If this was a problem in the gem, it is now fixed:
> >
> > > > $ rvm 1.9.1
> > > > $ which ruby
> > > > /Users/david/.rvm/ruby-1.9.1-p243/bin/ruby
> > > > $ rake spec
> > > > ...
> > > > 1522 examples, 0 failures, 2 pending
> >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > David
> >
> > > > > I''m
> > > > > getting the following error message when I run the
specs:
> >
> > > > >
/opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/spec/spec/runner/
> > > > > option_parser_spec.rb:21:in `block (2 levels) in
<top (required)>'':
> > > > > wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) (ArgumentError)
> >
> > > > > After analyzing the error message, it appears that
"use_fakefs"
> method
> > > > > on lines 21 and 522 of the
> >
> > > > > option_parser_spec.rb
> >
> > > > > should take an argument.
> >
> > > > > -Conrad
> >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > > > rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> > > > >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > > rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://
> > > rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> > >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://
> rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20091123/e90e7442/attachment-0001.html>

On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:35 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Bogdan Dumitru <dumbogdan at
gmail.com> wrote:
> The syntax for use_fakefs changed in version 0.2.1 and the fixtures
> for rspec are generating errors, but it can be solved easily.
> Have to change ...
> describe "smth" do
>   extend FakeFS::SpecHelpers
>   use_fakefs
>   ...
> end
> To...
> extend FakeFS::SpecHelpers
> use_fakefs describe "smth" do ... end
> 
> As it seems the use_fakefs method now takes the describe block as a
> parameter and thus the error regarding the wrong number of parameters.
> 
> I had to do this slightly differently, but got it to work with
fakefs-0.2.1. Fixed in git.
> 
> Cheers,
> David
You can use include, too:

  module SpecHelpers
    def self.extended(example_group)
      example_group.use_fakefs(example_group)
    end

    def self.included(example_group)
      example_group.extend self
    end
  ..
 end

Scott

>  
> 
> 
> On Nov 8, 3:30 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra... at
gmail.com> wrote:
> > > David, I''m still seeing the issue.  Thus,
here''s a transcript of my
> > > activity:
> >
> > >http://pastie.org/688639
> >
> > $ gem which fakefs
> > (checking gem bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1 for fakefs)
> >
/Users/david/.rvm/gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1/lib/fakefs.rb
> >
> > What version of fakefs are you using?
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Conrad
> >
> > > On Nov 4, 2:28 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at
gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra...
at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi, ''rake spec'' failed to run on Ruby
1.9.1p243 and RSpec 1.2.9.
> >
> > > > Hi Conrad,
> >
> > > > If this was a problem in the gem, it is now fixed:
> >
> > > > $ rvm 1.9.1
> > > > $ which ruby
> > > > /Users/david/.rvm/ruby-1.9.1-p243/bin/ruby
> > > > $ rake spec
> > > > ...
> > > > 1522 examples, 0 failures, 2 pending
> >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > David
> >
> > > > > I''m
> > > > > getting the following error message when I run the
specs:
> >
> > > > >
/opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/spec/spec/runner/
> > > > > option_parser_spec.rb:21:in `block (2 levels) in
<top (required)>'':
> > > > > wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) (ArgumentError)
> >
> > > > > After analyzing the error message, it appears that
"use_fakefs" method
> > > > > on lines 21 and 522 of the
> >
> > > > > option_parser_spec.rb
> >
> > > > > should take an argument.
> >
> > > > > -Conrad
> >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > > > rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> > > > >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > > rspec-us... at rubyforge.orghttp://
> > > rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rspec-users mailing list
> > > rspec-us... at rubyforge.org
> > >http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rspec-users mailing list
> > rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20091123/c7a95b80/attachment.html>

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Scott Taylor <scott at railsnewbie.com>
wrote:
>
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:35 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Bogdan Dumitru <dumbogdan at
gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> The syntax for use_fakefs changed in version 0.2.1 and the fixtures
>> for rspec are generating errors, but it can be solved easily.
>> Have to change ...
>> describe "smth" do
>>   extend FakeFS::SpecHelpers
>>   use_fakefs
>>   ...
>> end
>> To...
>> extend FakeFS::SpecHelpers
>> use_fakefs describe "smth" do ... end
>>
>> As it seems the use_fakefs method now takes the describe block as a
>> parameter and thus the error regarding the wrong number of parameters.
>>
>
> I had to do this slightly differently, but got it to work with
> fakefs-0.2.1. Fixed in git.
>
> Cheers,
> David
>
>
> You can use include, too:
>
>   module SpecHelpers
>     def self.extended(example_group)
>       example_group.use_fakefs(example_group)
>     end
>
>     def self.included(example_group)
>       example_group.extend self
>     end
>   ..
>  end
>
That''s exactly what I did :)

http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/commit/65485d8be96cd0cb474dc29b6778180349c2d8ee

Cheers,
David

>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 8, 3:30 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at gmail.com>
wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Conrad Taylor <conra... at
gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > David, I''m still seeing the issue.  Thus,
here''s a transcript of my
>> > > activity:
>> >
>> > >http://pastie.org/688639
>> >
>> > $ gem which fakefs
>> > (checking gem bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1 for fakefs)
>> >
>>
/Users/david/.rvm/gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/bmabey-fakefs-0.1.1.1/lib/fakefs.rb
>> >
>> > What version of fakefs are you using?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > -Conrad
>> >
>> > > On Nov 4, 2:28 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim... at
gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Conrad Taylor
<conra... at gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > Hi, ''rake spec'' failed to run on
Ruby 1.9.1p243 and RSpec 1.2.9.
>> >
>> > > > Hi Conrad,
>> >
>> > > > If this was a problem in the gem, it is now fixed:
>> >
>> > > > $ rvm 1.9.1
>> > > > $ which ruby
>> > > > /Users/david/.rvm/ruby-1.9.1-p243/bin/ruby
>> > > > $ rake spec
>> > > > ...
>> > > > 1522 examples, 0 failures, 2 pending
>> >
>> > > > Cheers,
>> > > > David
>> >
>> > > > > I''m
>> > > > > getting the following error message when I run the
specs:
>> >
>> > > > >
/opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rspec-1.2.9/spec/spec/runner/
>> > > > > option_parser_spec.rb:21:in `block (2 levels) in
<top
>> (required)>'':
>> > > > > wrong number of arguments (0 for 1) (ArgumentError)
>> >
>> > > > > After analyzing the error message, it appears that
"use_fakefs"
>> method
>> > > > > on lines 21 and 522 of the
>> >
>> > > > > option_parser_spec.rb
>> >
>> > > > > should take an argument.
>> >
>> > > > > -Conrad
>> >
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20091123/bf5ccd6f/attachment.html>

On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:12 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Scott Taylor <scott at
railsnewbie.com> wrote:
> 
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:35 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Bogdan Dumitru <dumbogdan at
gmail.com> wrote:
>> The syntax for use_fakefs changed in version 0.2.1 and the fixtures
>> for rspec are generating errors, but it can be solved easily.
>> Have to change ...
>> describe "smth" do
>>   extend FakeFS::SpecHelpers
>>   use_fakefs
>>   ...
>> end
>> To...
>> extend FakeFS::SpecHelpers
>> use_fakefs describe "smth" do ... end
>> 
>> As it seems the use_fakefs method now takes the describe block as a
>> parameter and thus the error regarding the wrong number of parameters.
>> 
>> I had to do this slightly differently, but got it to work with
fakefs-0.2.1. Fixed in git.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> David
> 
> You can use include, too:
> 
>   module SpecHelpers
>     def self.extended(example_group)
>       example_group.use_fakefs(example_group)
>     end
> 
>     def self.included(example_group)
>       example_group.extend self
>     end
>   ..
>  end
> 
> That''s exactly what I did :)
> 
>
http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/commit/65485d8be96cd0cb474dc29b6778180349c2d8ee
Hadn''t realized the docs were wrong in the README.  Now they are
updated:

http://github.com/defunkt/fakefs/commit/ceffec3023a2c790cd567275168ed6d6e5bf4ba9

Thanks for the heads up.

Scott

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20091123/7c79ae24/attachment.html>