Hi Steve,
I wrote the spec first and then the implementation. I think I could
have written a better behavior description. I don''t think the method
name is as good or specific as it could be. I just wanted the class to
be able to add two numbers... so maybe the specification could reflect
that more... and I want the class to add two numbers because I wanted
to practice using rspec and figured a simple program would be good to
start out with.
- Calvin
On Sep 21, 7:47?pm, Stephen Eley <sfe... at gmail.com>
wrote:> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Calvin <cstephe... at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > I am pretty new to RSpec and I wonder if some code I have written is
> > leading me in the right direction. Any advice is greatly appreciated!
>
> As a beginner exercise, this code looks perfectly functional to me.
> But I believe you left out the interesting parts:
>
> * Which did you write first? ?The spec or the implementation?
>
> * Is the behavior description, "it should perform calculations,"
clear
> and precise? ?If I didn''t have access to the code, would I be able
to
> read that description and know something useful about the class''s
> behavior?
>
> * Why did you choose the method name "equation"? ?If I simply
knew
> that name, would I be able to tell what that method does?
>
> * What is it you _really_ want this class to do? ?Does the
> specification help you verify that it acts according to your
> intention?
>
> * Why do you want it to do that? ?(Okay, granted, this may be more of
> a Cucumber question than an RSpec question.) ?>8->
>
> --
> Have Fun,
> ? ?Steve Eley (sfe... at gmail.com)
> ? ?ESCAPE POD - The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine
> ? ?http://www.escapepod.org
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-us... at
rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users