rspec users - Jul 2008 - Spec::Rails::Example::ModelExampleGroup

Hi list!

I get some not-so-nice output from rspec-rails when using the -f specdoc
option. It happens both with the spec command and the rake task and on a
prestine, newly generated rails app.

I''m using rspec & rspec-rails 1.1.4 and rails 2.0.1.

Is this a bug? Do you get the same output?

-- Siemen

Output:
siemen at lazarus 0 /tmp/rs-app/spec % rake spec SPEC_OPTS=''-f s
-c''

Spec::Rails::Example::RailsExampleGroup

Spec::Rails::Example::ModelExampleGroup

Spec::Rails::Example::FunctionalExampleGroup

Spec::Rails::Example::ControllerExampleGroup

Spec::Rails::Example::HelperExampleGroup

Spec::Rails::Example::ViewExampleGroup

Object
- has legs

Finished in 0.159382 seconds

1 example, 0 failures
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20080718/94dad557/attachment-0001.html>

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Siemen Baader <siemenbaader at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi list!
>
> I get some not-so-nice output from rspec-rails when using the -f specdoc
> option. It happens both with the spec command and the rake task and on a
> prestine, newly generated rails app.
>
> I''m using rspec & rspec-rails 1.1.4 and rails 2.0.1.
>
> Is this a bug? Do you get the same output?
It''s a bug in 1.1.4 but it''s already been fixed in git.

Cheers,
David

Thanks for you reply!

I had tried the newest checkouts of rsepc and rspec-rails from git as well,
but my locally installed rspec gem was 1.1.4 and apparently rake did use
that instead!

-- Siemen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20080718/3b3ee8ae/attachment.html>