Redhat secure server - May 2000 - upgrade to RH 6.2 fails

I am not having any success on the 6.2 upgrade - the Secre Server fails when I
have added several Virtual Hosts.

I am moving from the 6.1 RedHat Professional, to the newer 6.2 Professional and
for the time being, have "downgraded" my SSL server to the RH6.1
version

Any advice wwha needs to be done differently to allow virtuals?


JEFF HALPER * Internet Hotline * POB 5787 * SJ CA  95150
http://www.ihot.com
mailto:jeff@ihot.com
408/881-1000  Fax 408/293-3456

On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 11:28:38AM -0700, Jeff Halper
wrote:
> I am not having any success on the 6.2 upgrade - the Secre Server fails
when I have added several Virtual Hosts.
> 
> I am moving from the 6.1 RedHat Professional, to the newer 6.2 Professional
and for the time being, have "downgraded" my SSL server to the RH6.1
version
> 
> Any advice wwha needs to be done differently to allow virtuals?
Get the errata from http://www.redhat.com/errata/.  Support for multiple
SSL-enabled virtual hosts did not work correctly in the version packaged
on the CD.

Nalin

On Sat, 13 May 2000 23:29:54 -0400, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
>Get the errata from http://www.redhat.com/errata/.  Support for multiple
>SSL-enabled virtual hosts did not work correctly in the version packaged
>on the CD.
	I would of hoped, in a release version, that quality control
would of caught something as major as that ! :(
"I''ve been doing the Fonda workout: the Peter Fonda workout. 
That''s where I
wake up, take a hit of acid, smoke a joint, and go to my sister''s house
and
ask her for money."
     --Kevin Meaney



From mail@mail.redhat.com May 12:42:18 2000  -0400
Received: (qmail 23896 invoked from network); 22 May 2000 16:42:19 -0000
Received: from mail.redhat.com (199.183.24.239)
  by lists.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 May 2000 16:42:19 -0000
Received: from zeus.crimsonnet.net ([151.205.132.2])
	by mail.redhat.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA19633;
	Mon, 22 May 2000 12:42:18 -0400
Received: from huckfinn (huckfinn.crimsonnet.net [151.205.132.9])
	by zeus.crimsonnet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA10058;
	Mon, 22 May 2000 12:49:26 -0400
Message-ID: <01b801bfc40e$c0e43230$0984cd97@huckfinn>
From: "Adam Frey" <bugtraq@crimsonnetwork.com>
To: <redhat-secure-server@redhat.com>, <pbrown@redhat.com>
Subject: secureweb-3.2 vs secureweb-3.1
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 12:57:03 -0400
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600

Regarding the secureweb-3.2, since I have secureweb-3.1 can I upgrade using
rhmask and a download, or do I have to buy a RedHat Pro CD?

Can I also ask what were the major differences between the two? I must say,
my 3.1 has had problems keeping the daemon alive ever since I installed it
(imagine telling customers to use your e-commerce website and it isn''t
working!). It has died every few days since I installed it. Did 3.2 fix any
of this problem? Were there any security features that 3.2 has that were
overlooked in 3.1? Is there any a big reason to switch to 3.2?

Thanks for the info,

Adam Frey
Crimson Networks
http://www.crimsonnet.net