I recently upgraded my server to RH6.0 and then received RH''s Secure Server 2.0 in the mail. Unfortunately, all the packages in SS2.0 are older than their equivalents in RH6.0 e.g. php, mod_perl etc. The SS2.0 includes an installation script and I don''t think there''s a "-force" key for that. I haven''t bothered looking at the cd but I could probably force the individual rpm packages. Even if there was a force switch for the script, I would be hesitant to use it until I did my homework because I am just not that familiar with the linux environment and dependencies in shared libraries. I did send Preston Brown a note inquiring about upgrade status of SS: Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 21:05:50 -0400 (EDT) From: pbrown@redhat.com To: ron parker <rtp@mi-recordz.com> Subject: Re: RH6.0 & Secure Server 2.0 We will have an update for SWS 2.0 to better work with RH 6.0 this week, and we have an entirely new SWS coming out soon as well. --- Preston Brown Systems Engineer pbrown@redhat.com Red Hat Software, Inc. ---------------------------------------------------------- If you''ve learned anything new, please let us know. I have to build a secure server by yesterday at the latest. ron parker rtp@mi-recordz.com Bradley Glonka wrote:> > > The PHP v3 Apache module shipped with Red Hat Linux 6.0 Web Server 2.0 > > does not function properly with some PHP code. The PHP team also > > discovered some issues with PHP and glibc 2.1. For this reason, we > > are making PHP 3.0.8 available, which corrects these issues. We have > > also included PostgreSQL and IMAP support on the basis of user demand. > > I realize this says for RedHat 6 but what about for secure server 2.0?(its > mentioned above). > > failed dependencies: > libttf.so.2 is needed by mod_php3-3.0.8-1 > libcrypt.so.1(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by mod_php3-3.0.8-1 > libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by mod_php3-3.0.8-1 > libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by mod_php3-3.0.8-1 > libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by mod_php3-3.0.8-1 > libresolv.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by mod_php3-3.0.8-1 > > Is glibc2.1 not backward compatibale with glibc2.0? > > I saw several emails that said secure server was not compatible with > Red Hat 6. So, will there be a version of this RPM for secure server? > > Thanks > Brad > > -- > PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES! > http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com > To unsubscribe: mail redhat-secure-server-request@redhat.com with > "unsubscribe" as the Subject.