thr3ads.net - Rails spinoffs - obtaining table cell text data [May 2008]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Jonathan_C

2008-May-19 21:25 UTC

obtaining table cell text data

I''m writing some code to subset a table based on the contents of
particular columns.  My event handler starts off like this:

  subsetChange: function(e) {
    var subset = $F(''subsetSelector'');
    var rows = $$(''.content-row'');
    rows.each(function(row) {
      var value =
row.down(''.Platform_Category'').childNodes[0].data;
      switch (subset) {

      ... show/hide rows based on whether the value matches the user
selected subset ...

My question is whether there is a more Prototype-ish way to get the
values from my table cells instead of using ".childNodes[0].data".

Thanks in advance for any advice.

-- Jon

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

kangax

2008-May-19 22:45 UTC

head link

Re: obtaining table cell text data

Why not just do $$(''.content-row .Platform_Category'')?
Also, a safer alternative to childNodes[0] is #firstDescendant or
#down

- kangax

On May 19, 5:25 pm, Jonathan_C
<Jonathan.S.Calla...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> I''m writing some code to subset a table based on the contents of
> particular columns.  My event handler starts off like this:
>
>   subsetChange: function(e) {
>     var subset = $F(''subsetSelector'');
>     var rows = $$(''.content-row'');
>     rows.each(function(row) {
>       var value =
row.down(''.Platform_Category'').childNodes[0].data;
>       switch (subset) {
>
>       ... show/hide rows based on whether the value matches the user
> selected subset ...
>
> My question is whether there is a more Prototype-ish way to get the
> values from my table cells instead of using
".childNodes[0].data".
>
> Thanks in advance for any advice.
>
> -- Jon--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Jonathan_C

2008-May-19 23:03 UTC

head link

Re: obtaining table cell text data

I collect an array of rows because I want to do row.show()/row.hide()
later on in the code.  I thought the code would look cleaner this way
as oppose to doing cell.up(''tr'').show()/hide().

And I tried using #down() and #firstDescendant() instead of
#childNodes[0] but I always get a "...has no properties" message
whenever I do.  I''m running Firefox 2.0 on Ubuntu.

-- Jon



On May 19, 3:45 pm, kangax
<kan...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> Why not just do $$(''.content-row .Platform_Category'')?
> Also, a safer alternative to childNodes[0] is #firstDescendant or
> #down
>
> - kangax
>
> On May 19, 5:25 pm, Jonathan_C
<Jonathan.S.Calla...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > I''m writing some code to subset a table based on the contents
of
> > particular columns.  My event handler starts off like this:
>
> >   subsetChange: function(e) {
> >     var subset = $F(''subsetSelector'');
> >     var rows = $$(''.content-row'');
> >     rows.each(function(row) {
> >       var value =
row.down(''.Platform_Category'').childNodes[0].data;
> >       switch (subset) {
>
> >       ... show/hide rows based on whether the value matches the user
> > selected subset ...
>
> > My question is whether there is a more Prototype-ish way to get the
> > values from my table cells instead of using
".childNodes[0].data".
>
> > Thanks in advance for any advice.
>
> > -- Jon--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

RobG

2008-May-20 23:17 UTC

head link

Re: obtaining table cell text data

On May 20, 7:25 am, Jonathan_C
<Jonathan.S.Calla...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> I''m writing some code to subset a table based on the contents of
> particular columns.  My event handler starts off like this:
>
>   subsetChange: function(e) {
>     var subset = $F(''subsetSelector'');
>     var rows = $$(''.content-row'');
rows isn''ta  good variable name as table and table section elements
have a rows collection, so may be confusing.

>     rows.each(function(row) {
>       var value =
row.down(''.Platform_Category'').childNodes[0].data;
>       switch (subset) {
>
>       ... show/hide rows based on whether the value matches the user
> selected subset ...
>
> My question is whether there is a more Prototype-ish way to get the
> values from my table cells instead of using
".childNodes[0].data".
Why not use either DOM 3 textContent or IE innerText?  e.g.

 function getText (el) {
   if (typeof el.textContent == ''string'') return
el.textContent;
   if (typeof el.innerText == ''string'') return el.innerText;
 }

Or if you want to be "Prototypeis":

Element.addMethods({
  getText: function(element) {
    element = $(element);
    if (typeof element.textContent == ''string'') {
      return element.textContent;
    }
    if (typeof element.innerText == ''string'') {
      return element.innerText;
    }
  }
});


Table rows have a cells collection that contains all the cells in the
row, so if you want the content of the first cell:

  var value = rows[i].cells[0].getText();


--
Rob
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

kangax

2008-May-21 00:45 UTC

head link

Re: obtaining table cell text data

Sometimes I hate how in order to make things efficient (?), the code
size becomes really huge:

var getText = (function(){
  var type = document.createElement(''div'');
  if (typeof element.textContent != ''undefined'') {
    return function(element) {
      return element.textContent;
    }
  }
  else if (typeof element.innerText != ''undefined'') {
    return function(element) {
      return element.innerText;
    }
  }
  return function(){};
})();

- kangax

On May 20, 7:17 pm, RobG <rg...-AFFH1GffN5hPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> On May 20, 7:25 am, Jonathan_C
<Jonathan.S.Calla...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > I''m writing some code to subset a table based on the contents
of
> > particular columns.  My event handler starts off like this:
>
> >   subsetChange: function(e) {
> >     var subset = $F(''subsetSelector'');
> >     var rows = $$(''.content-row'');
>
> rows isn''ta  good variable name as table and table section
elements
> have a rows collection, so may be confusing.
>
> >     rows.each(function(row) {
> >       var value =
row.down(''.Platform_Category'').childNodes[0].data;
> >       switch (subset) {
>
> >       ... show/hide rows based on whether the value matches the user
> > selected subset ...
>
> > My question is whether there is a more Prototype-ish way to get the
> > values from my table cells instead of using
".childNodes[0].data".
>
> Why not use either DOM 3 textContent or IE innerText?  e.g.
>
>  function getText (el) {
>    if (typeof el.textContent == ''string'') return
el.textContent;
>    if (typeof el.innerText == ''string'') return
el.innerText;
>  }
>
> Or if you want to be "Prototypeis":
>
> Element.addMethods({
>   getText: function(element) {
>     element = $(element);
>     if (typeof element.textContent == ''string'') {
>       return element.textContent;
>     }
>     if (typeof element.innerText == ''string'') {
>       return element.innerText;
>     }
>   }
>
> });
>
> Table rows have a cells collection that contains all the cells in the
> row, so if you want the content of the first cell:
>
>   var value = rows[i].cells[0].getText();
>
> --
> Rob--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

RobG

2008-May-21 02:02 UTC

head link

Re: obtaining table cell text data

On May 21, 10:45 am, kangax
<kan...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> Sometimes I hate how in order to make things efficient (?), the code
> size becomes really huge:
>
> var getText = (function(){
>   var type = document.createElement(''div'');
I think a more appropriate name for that variables is "temp" or maybe
just t or x or whatever.
>   if (typeof element.textContent != ''undefined'') {
I think you meant:

    if (typeof type.textContent != ''undefined'') {

I don''t see the point of a comparison with
''undefined'' given that we
know we want a string and only a string (maybe some implementation
decides to return ''object'' or ''function'' or
''null'' or such
weirdness).  The above is no better than:

    if (type.textContent) {


Some would argue that the strict equals operator  (=== ) should be
used.  So:

  var t = document.createElement(''div'');
  if (typeof t.textContent === ''string'') {

>     return function(element) {
>       return element.textContent;
>     }
>   }
>   else if (typeof element.innerText != ''undefined'') {
>     return function(element) {
>       return element.innerText;
>     }
>   }
>   return function(){};
> })();
Considering the result is more complex code, the benefit of such
optimisation must be weighed against the loss of simplicity.

I expect that before the above becomes noticeably faster the function
will have to be run several thousand times in succession.  That is
unlikely to occur so very little (if anything) will be gained by such
optimisation.  I''d rather stick with simplicity.

If the intention is to write a more general function, then the above
should be extended to include a recursive function where neither
textContent or innerText are supported, e.g.:

Element.addMethods({
  getText: (function() {
    var t = document.createElement(''div'');
    if (typeof t.textContent == ''string'') {
      return function(element) {return element.textContent;}
    }
    if (typeof t.innerText == ''string'') {
      return function(element) {return element.innerText;}
    }

    return function(element) {
      return rec(element);

      function rec(el) {
        var n, x = el.childNodes;
        var txt = [];
        for (var i=0, len=x.length; i<len; ++i){
          n = x[i];
          if (3 == n.nodeType) {
            txt.push(n.data);
          } else if (1 == n.nodeType){
            txt.push(rec(n));
          }
        }
        return txt.join('''').replace(/\s+/g,''
'');
      }
    }
  })()
});


However in the case of Prototype.js, any browser that doesn''t support
either textContent or innerText is likely going to have lots of other
issues.


--
Rob
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

kangax

2008-May-21 13:50 UTC

head link

Re: obtaining table cell text data

On May 20, 10:02 pm, RobG <rg...-AFFH1GffN5hPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> On May 21, 10:45 am, kangax
<kan...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > Sometimes I hate how in order to make things efficient (?), the code
> > size becomes really huge:
>
> > var getText = (function(){
> >   var type = document.createElement(''div'');
>
> I think a more appropriate name for that variables is "temp" or
maybe
> just t or x or whatever.
>
Not sure how "type" slipped in there, but it was originally an
"element" of course : ) (need to be more careful next time)
> >   if (typeof element.textContent != ''undefined'') {
>
> I think you meant:
>
>     if (typeof type.textContent != ''undefined'') {
>
> I don''t see the point of a comparison with
''undefined'' given that we
> know we want a string and only a string (maybe some implementation
> decides to return ''object'' or
''function'' or ''null'' or such
> weirdness).  The above is no better than:
>
>     if (type.textContent) {
>
I didn''t want to enforce certain result type (i.e. string) therefore
test for not "undefined". Testing for "string" definitely
makes sense
in this case if that''s what function guarantees to return.
> Some would argue that the strict equals operator  (=== ) should be
> used.  So:
>
I don''t use strict comparison with "typeof" since both values
are of
the same type, but I guess it''s a matter of preference/conventions.
>   var t = document.createElement(''div'');
>   if (typeof t.textContent === ''string'') {
>
> >     return function(element) {
> >       return element.textContent;
> >     }
> >   }
> >   else if (typeof element.innerText != ''undefined'')
{
> >     return function(element) {
> >       return element.innerText;
> >     }
> >   }
> >   return function(){};
> > })();
>
> Considering the result is more complex code, the benefit of such
> optimisation must be weighed against the loss of simplicity.
>
> I expect that before the above becomes noticeably faster the function
> will have to be run several thousand times in succession.  That is
> unlikely to occur so very little (if anything) will be gained by such
> optimisation.  I''d rather stick with simplicity.
>
As I mentioned, I wasn''t sure if code complexity is worth the
performance gains of this "optimization". I always find such decisions
a pain to make.

Best,
kangax
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Maybe Matching Threads

Search for more reasonably related threads

Rails spinoffs - May 2008 - obtaining table cell text data

obtaining table cell text data

Re: obtaining table cell text data

Re: obtaining table cell text data

Re: obtaining table cell text data

Re: obtaining table cell text data

Re: obtaining table cell text data

Re: obtaining table cell text data

Maybe Matching Threads