thr3ads.net - Rails spinoffs - Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem [Sep 2007]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org

2007-Sep-07 13:25 UTC

Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Whenever I try to BlindDown/ScrollDown a div, it scrolls a few pixels
too far and then it''ll hop back a few pixel to it''s intended
size. It
has nothing to do with the content of the div, since it''ll also do
this when the div is empty.

See the top-div at http://www.ttv-vvv.nl/home/startpagina/

Thanks in advance,
Hendrik Nijmeijer, the Netherlands


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Antonio CS

2007-Sep-07 13:38 UTC

head link

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

I think this is the default behavior. I also use the BlindDown/ScrollDown
effect and it also does this.

On 9/7/07, hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:>
>
> Whenever I try to BlindDown/ScrollDown a div, it scrolls a few pixels
> too far and then it''ll hop back a few pixel to it''s
intended size. It
> has nothing to do with the content of the div, since it''ll also do
> this when the div is empty.
>
> See the top-div at http://www.ttv-vvv.nl/home/startpagina/
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Hendrik Nijmeijer, the Netherlands
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org

2007-Sep-07 13:48 UTC

head link

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

I can''t see how this is default behaviour, and i''ve seen it
working
normally on i.e. the demo page of scriptaculous....

Hendrik

On 7 sep, 15:38, "Antonio CS"
<antoni...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> I think this is the default behavior. I also use the BlindDown/ScrollDown
> effect and it also does this.
>
> On 9/7/07, hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Whenever I try to BlindDown/ScrollDown a div, it scrolls a few pixels
> > too far and then it''ll hop back a few pixel to it''s
intended size. It
> > has nothing to do with the content of the div, since it''ll
also do
> > this when the div is empty.
>
> > See the top-div athttp://www.ttv-vvv.nl/home/startpagina/
>
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Hendrik Nijmeijer, the Netherlands

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Nicolás Sanguinetti

2007-Sep-07 14:30 UTC

head link

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Padding attack! Remove the vertical padding from the element and check
if it works.

Nicolas

On 9/7/07, hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:>
> I can''t see how this is default behaviour, and i''ve seen
it working
> normally on i.e. the demo page of scriptaculous....
>
> Hendrik
>
> On 7 sep, 15:38, "Antonio CS"
<antoni...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > I think this is the default behavior. I also use the
BlindDown/ScrollDown
> > effect and it also does this.
> >
> > On 9/7/07, hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Whenever I try to BlindDown/ScrollDown a div, it scrolls a few
pixels
> > > too far and then it''ll hop back a few pixel to
it''s intended size. It
> > > has nothing to do with the content of the div, since
it''ll also do
> > > this when the div is empty.
> >
> > > See the top-div athttp://www.ttv-vvv.nl/home/startpagina/
> >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Hendrik Nijmeijer, the Netherlands
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org

2007-Sep-07 15:10 UTC

head link

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Hmm, i''ve removed the padding, and however the "hop" is
smaller, it''s
still there...

On Sep 7, 4:30 pm, "Nicolás Sanguinetti"
<godf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> Padding attack! Remove the vertical padding from the element and check
> if it works.
>
> Nicolas
>
> On 9/7/07, hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I can''t see how this is default behaviour, and i''ve
seen it working
> > normally on i.e. the demo page of scriptaculous....
>
> > Hendrik
>
> > On 7 sep, 15:38, "Antonio CS"
<antoni...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > I think this is the default behavior. I also use the
BlindDown/ScrollDown
> > > effect and it also does this.
>
> > > On 9/7/07, hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > > > Whenever I try to BlindDown/ScrollDown a div, it scrolls a
few pixels
> > > > too far and then it''ll hop back a few pixel to
it''s intended size. It
> > > > has nothing to do with the content of the div, since
it''ll also do
> > > > this when the div is empty.
>
> > > > See the top-div athttp://www.ttv-vvv.nl/home/startpagina/
>
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > Hendrik Nijmeijer, the Netherlands

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org

2007-Sep-07 15:20 UTC

head link

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

I think I fixed it with the removal of the border of the div, strange
but true.

Any explanations?

On Sep 7, 5:10 pm, "hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> Hmm, i''ve removed the padding, and however the "hop" is
smaller, it''s
> still there...
>
> On Sep 7, 4:30 pm, "Nicolás Sanguinetti"
<godf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > Padding attack! Remove the vertical padding from the element and check
> > if it works.
>
> > Nicolas
>
> > On 9/7/07, hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > > I can''t see how this is default behaviour, and
i''ve seen it working
> > > normally on i.e. the demo page of scriptaculous....
>
> > > Hendrik
>
> > > On 7 sep, 15:38, "Antonio CS"
<antoni...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > I think this is the default behavior. I also use the
BlindDown/ScrollDown
> > > > effect and it also does this.
>
> > > > On 9/7/07, hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > > > > Whenever I try to BlindDown/ScrollDown a div, it
scrolls a few pixels
> > > > > too far and then it''ll hop back a few pixel to
it''s intended size. It
> > > > > has nothing to do with the content of the div, since
it''ll also do
> > > > > this when the div is empty.
>
> > > > > See the top-div
athttp://www.ttv-vvv.nl/home/startpagina/
>
> > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > Hendrik Nijmeijer, the Netherlands

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Nicolás Sanguinetti

2007-Sep-07 15:51 UTC

head link

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

I suppose the problem is that it''s counting the offsetHeight without
considering the paddings and borders. This was discussed not long ago
in the prototype-core list I think.

Quick solution:

new Effect.BlindDown( $("element").wrap("div").up(), .... );

the wrapping div doesn''t have neither paddings nor borders, so it
should work fine :)

-Nicolas

On 9/7/07, hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:>
> I think I fixed it with the removal of the border of the div, strange
> but true.
>
> Any explanations?
>
> On Sep 7, 5:10 pm,
"hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Hmm, i''ve removed the padding, and however the
"hop" is smaller, it''s
> > still there...
> >
> > On Sep 7, 4:30 pm, "Nicolás Sanguinetti"
<godf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Padding attack! Remove the vertical padding from the element and
check
> > > if it works.
> >
> > > Nicolas
> >
> > > On 9/7/07, hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > I can''t see how this is default behaviour, and
i''ve seen it working
> > > > normally on i.e. the demo page of scriptaculous....
> >
> > > > Hendrik
> >
> > > > On 7 sep, 15:38, "Antonio CS"
<antoni...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > > I think this is the default behavior. I also use the
BlindDown/ScrollDown
> > > > > effect and it also does this.
> >
> > > > > On 9/7/07,
hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Whenever I try to BlindDown/ScrollDown a div, it
scrolls a few pixels
> > > > > > too far and then it''ll hop back a few
pixel to it''s intended size. It
> > > > > > has nothing to do with the content of the div,
since it''ll also do
> > > > > > this when the div is empty.
> >
> > > > > > See the top-div
athttp://www.ttv-vvv.nl/home/startpagina/
> >
> > > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > > Hendrik Nijmeijer, the Netherlands
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Brian Williams

2007-Sep-07 15:54 UTC

head link

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

thanks i was wondering about this because removing the padding in the site i
am working on right now is not a solution, at least not an easy one to
maintain the look & feel



On 9/7/07, Nicolás Sanguinetti
<godfoca-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:>
>
> I suppose the problem is that it''s counting the offsetHeight
without
> considering the paddings and borders. This was discussed not long ago
> in the prototype-core list I think.
>
> Quick solution:
>
> new Effect.BlindDown( $("element").wrap("div").up(),
.... );
>
> the wrapping div doesn''t have neither paddings nor borders, so it
> should work fine :)
>
> -Nicolas
>
> On 9/7/07, hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > I think I fixed it with the removal of the border of the div, strange
> > but true.
> >
> > Any explanations?
> >
> > On Sep 7, 5:10 pm,
"hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > Hmm, i''ve removed the padding, and however the
"hop" is smaller, it''s
> > > still there...
> > >
> > > On Sep 7, 4:30 pm, "Nicolás Sanguinetti"
<godf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Padding attack! Remove the vertical padding from the element
and
> check
> > > > if it works.
> > >
> > > > Nicolas
> > >
> > > > On 9/7/07, hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I can''t see how this is default behaviour, and
i''ve seen it
> working
> > > > > normally on i.e. the demo page of scriptaculous....
> > >
> > > > > Hendrik
> > >
> > > > > On 7 sep, 15:38, "Antonio CS"
<antoni...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > > > I think this is the default behavior. I also use
the
> BlindDown/ScrollDown
> > > > > > effect and it also does this.
> > >
> > > > > > On 9/7/07,
hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > Whenever I try to BlindDown/ScrollDown a div,
it scrolls a few
> pixels
> > > > > > > too far and then it''ll hop back a
few pixel to it''s intended
> size. It
> > > > > > > has nothing to do with the content of the
div, since it''ll
> also do
> > > > > > > this when the div is empty.
> > >
> > > > > > > See the top-div
athttp://www.ttv-vvv.nl/home/startpagina/
> > >
> > > > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > > > Hendrik Nijmeijer, the Netherlands
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Antonio CS

2007-Sep-07 16:20 UTC

head link

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

I can''t find reference to the wrap method. Can you give me a link to
some
reference please?

On 9/7/07, Nicolás Sanguinetti
<godfoca-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:>
>
> I suppose the problem is that it''s counting the offsetHeight
without
> considering the paddings and borders. This was discussed not long ago
> in the prototype-core list I think.
>
> Quick solution:
>
> new Effect.BlindDown( $("element").wrap("div").up(),
.... );
>
> the wrapping div doesn''t have neither paddings nor borders, so it
> should work fine :)
>
> -Nicolas
>
> On 9/7/07, hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > I think I fixed it with the removal of the border of the div, strange
> > but true.
> >
> > Any explanations?
> >
> > On Sep 7, 5:10 pm,
"hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > Hmm, i''ve removed the padding, and however the
"hop" is smaller, it''s
> > > still there...
> > >
> > > On Sep 7, 4:30 pm, "Nicolás Sanguinetti"
<godf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Padding attack! Remove the vertical padding from the element
and
> check
> > > > if it works.
> > >
> > > > Nicolas
> > >
> > > > On 9/7/07, hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I can''t see how this is default behaviour, and
i''ve seen it
> working
> > > > > normally on i.e. the demo page of scriptaculous....
> > >
> > > > > Hendrik
> > >
> > > > > On 7 sep, 15:38, "Antonio CS"
<antoni...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > > > I think this is the default behavior. I also use
the
> BlindDown/ScrollDown
> > > > > > effect and it also does this.
> > >
> > > > > > On 9/7/07,
hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > Whenever I try to BlindDown/ScrollDown a div,
it scrolls a few
> pixels
> > > > > > > too far and then it''ll hop back a
few pixel to it''s intended
> size. It
> > > > > > > has nothing to do with the content of the
div, since it''ll
> also do
> > > > > > > this when the div is empty.
> > >
> > > > > > > See the top-div
athttp://www.ttv-vvv.nl/home/startpagina/
> > >
> > > > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > > > Hendrik Nijmeijer, the Netherlands
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Brian Williams

2007-Sep-07 16:39 UTC

head link

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

here''s what a quick Google search found for me

http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5732



On 9/7/07, Antonio CS <antoniocs-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:>
> I can''t find reference to the wrap method. Can you give me a link
to some
> reference please?
>
> On 9/7/07, Nicolás Sanguinetti <
godfoca-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I suppose the problem is that it''s counting the offsetHeight
without
> > considering the paddings and borders. This was discussed not long ago
> > in the prototype-core list I think.
> >
> > Quick solution:
> >
> > new Effect.BlindDown(
$("element").wrap("div").up(), .... );
> >
> > the wrapping div doesn''t have neither paddings nor borders,
so it
> > should work fine :)
> >
> > -Nicolas
> >
> > On 9/7/07, hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org <
hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I think I fixed it with the removal of the border of the div,
strange
> > > but true.
> > >
> > > Any explanations?
> > >
> > > On Sep 7, 5:10 pm, "
hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > Hmm, i''ve removed the padding, and however the
"hop" is smaller,
> > it''s
> > > > still there...
> > > >
> > > > On Sep 7, 4:30 pm, "Nicolás Sanguinetti"
<godf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Padding attack! Remove the vertical padding from the
element and
> > check
> > > > > if it works.
> > > >
> > > > > Nicolas
> > > >
> > > > > On 9/7/07,
hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > I can''t see how this is default
behaviour, and i''ve seen it
> > working
> > > > > > normally on i.e. the demo page of
scriptaculous....
> > > >
> > > > > > Hendrik
> > > >
> > > > > > On 7 sep, 15:38, "Antonio CS"
<antoni...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > I think this is the default behavior. I also
use the
> > BlindDown/ScrollDown
> > > > > > > effect and it also does this.
> > > >
> > > > > > > On 9/7/07,
hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > > > Whenever I try to BlindDown/ScrollDown a
div, it scrolls a
> > few pixels
> > > > > > > > too far and then it''ll hop back
a few pixel to it''s intended
> > size. It
> > > > > > > > has nothing to do with the content of
the div, since it''ll
> > also do
> > > > > > > > this when the div is empty.
> > > >
> > > > > > > > See the top-div athttp://www.ttv-
vvv.nl/home/startpagina/
> > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > > > > Hendrik Nijmeijer, the Netherlands
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Nicolás Sanguinetti

2007-Sep-07 17:50 UTC

head link

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Element.wrap was added on 1.5.2_pre0 IIRC, but since 1.5.2 was dropped
in favor of 1.6.0, and 1.6 is still a release candidate, it''s not in
the "stable" version, and hence not in the docs.

Basically, element.wrap("tagName", { className: "stuff", id:
"stuff", ... }).

If you don''t pass any arguments, by defaults wraps your element on a
<div> tag.

On 9/7/07, Brian Williams
<brianw1975-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
wrote:> here''s what a quick Google search found for me
>
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5732
>
>
>
>
> On 9/7/07, Antonio CS
<antoniocs-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > I can''t find reference to the wrap method. Can you give me a
link to some
> reference please?
> >
> >
> > On 9/7/07, Nicolás Sanguinetti <
godfoca-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I suppose the problem is that it''s counting the
offsetHeight without
> > > considering the paddings and borders. This was discussed not long
ago
> > > in the prototype-core list I think.
> > >
> > > Quick solution:
> > >
> > > new Effect.BlindDown(
$("element").wrap("div").up(), .... );
> > >
> > > the wrapping div doesn''t have neither paddings nor
borders, so it
> > > should work fine :)
> > >
> > > -Nicolas
> > >
> > > On 9/7/07, hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org <
hendrikn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think I fixed it with the removal of the border of the
div, strange
> > > > but true.
> > > >
> > > > Any explanations?
> > > >
> > > > On Sep 7, 5:10 pm, "
hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > > Hmm, i''ve removed the padding, and however the
"hop" is smaller,
> it''s
> > > > > still there...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sep 7, 4:30 pm, "Nicolás Sanguinetti"
<godf...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Padding attack! Remove the vertical padding from
the element and
> check
> > > > > > if it works.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Nicolas
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 9/7/07,
hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > I can''t see how this is default
behaviour, and i''ve seen it
> working
> > > > > > > normally on i.e. the demo page of
scriptaculous....
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Hendrik
> > > > >
> > > > > > > On 7 sep, 15:38, "Antonio CS"
<antoni...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I think this is the default behavior. I
also use the
> BlindDown/ScrollDown
> > > > > > > > effect and it also does this.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 9/7/07,
hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
<hendr...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Whenever I try to
BlindDown/ScrollDown a div, it scrolls a
> few pixels
> > > > > > > > > too far and then it''ll hop
back a few pixel to it''s intended
> size. It
> > > > > > > > > has nothing to do with the content
of the div, since it''ll
> also do
> > > > > > > > > this when the div is empty.
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > See the top-div athttp://www.ttv-
vvv.nl/home/startpagina/
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > > > > > > Hendrik Nijmeijer, the Netherlands
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>  >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Rails spinoffs - Sep 2007 - Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem

Re: Scriptaculous Effect scaling problem