denisa
2007-Aug-10 19:31 UTC
Which version of JavaScript does Prototype and/or script.aculo.us require
Does anyone know which version of JavaScript Prototype and/or script.aculo.us requires? I''m creating a mobile version of a Rails application (which uses these libraries), and the script.aculo.us effects are not working when I surf to the mobile version using the Blazer web browser on my Palm Treo. Blazer 4.5 supports JavaScript 1.5, so I''m wondering if Prototype and/or script.aculo.us requires something in JavaScript 1.6 that is causing the effects to fail? Thanks, Denis --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RobG
2007-Aug-11 12:10 UTC
Re: Which version of JavaScript does Prototype and/or script.aculo.us require
On Aug 11, 5:31 am, denisa <de...-7BGefUt26HmXmMXjJBpWqg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> Does anyone know which version of JavaScript Prototype and/or > script.aculo.us requires? > > I''m creating a mobile version of a Rails application (which uses these > libraries), and the script.aculo.us effects are not working when I > surf to the mobile version using the Blazer web browser on my Palm > Treo. Blazer 4.5 supports JavaScript 1.5, so I''m wondering if > Prototype and/or script.aculo.us requires something in JavaScript 1.6 > that is causing the effects to fail?The version of javascript is almost irrelevant, any modern UA that claims javascript support is almost certainly compliant with ECMAScript Language Ed. 3, which is the standard underlying JavaScript 1.5. There are some minor variances, but none that really matter in most cases. Of far more importance is compliance with W3C standards, such as HTML 4 and the various DOM 2 standards: <URL: http://www.w3.org/DOM/ > Very few browsers or devices claim support JavaScript 1.6, it would be a very poor decision to require support for it in a web application intended for general use. -- Rob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---