Wolfram Arnold, RubyFocus
2013-Jul-18 01:38 UTC
Pull request #11486 -- implement respond_to_missing for TaggedLogging in Rails 3.2
Folks, I''ve sent a pull request https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/11486 which fixes an issue with TaggedLogging for Rails 3.2. From what I can tell that''s the only release that affected. The issue was that method_missing was overridden correctly in TaggedLogging, but respond_to_missing? was not. That caused issued when trying to use TaggedLogging inside another logger abstraction; in my case em-logger <http://rubygems.org/gems/em-logger>. It''s only a few lines and comes with a test. Please accept. A monkey patch with the same implementation has been fixing this in our app for a few days already and has been stable. Thanks, Wolf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.