On 8/5/07, Hendy Irawan <gauldong@gmail.com>
wrote:>
> Is there a way to use ''resources'' while still using our
own conventions?
>
> In Rails 1.2.3 and earlier I simply override it. I''m not sure how
to do it
> > 1.2.3.
>
> In my app, I have two Posts controller, one is for admin (read write)
side,
> one is for user (read only) side.
>
> The intended named routes would be:
>
>
> admin_posts /admin/posts/
> admin_show_post /admin/posts/2
> edit /admin/posts/2/edit
> update /admin/posts/2
> posts /posts/
> post /posts/2
> (etc.)
> I think I can do this using 3 resources statements, IF
''resources'' is
> fragmentable, one for admin index and show (that has custom named routes
> name), one for edit and update and destroy, one for regular show and index.
>
> But for now, I''m not sure how to do this other than setting up
the routes
> manually using the old way (i.e. without using
''resources'').
>
> Or to put it another way:
>
> How can I suppress a few routes to be generated by resource/resources
> statement? (i.e. I only want index and show, but not the others; or I want
> to exclude destroy)
>
> Thank you.
>
> (I''m posting this to core since this only applies to later Rails
versions)
ActionController::Resources does not provide a way to exclude routes
or use your own conventions. This isn''t really a support forum,
that''s what the main rubyonrails-talk is for. This forum is to
discuss future development of the rails framework.
--
Rick Olson
http://lighthouseapp.com
http://weblog.techno-weenie.net
http://mephistoblog.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---