What is the general opinion on the minimum required version of rubygems to run Rails? I''m running 0.8.11, and I''ve not yet had any problems running the test suites or Rails itself. The patch currently attached to http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6703, will, if applied, mean that the minimum version of rubygems required to run the test suite will be 0.9.0. Is this a reasonable requirement, or should the patch be modified to load mocha the same way as all the other test suites, which works fine with my ancient version of rubygems? - Matt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 7/24/07, Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org> wrote:> > > Is this a reasonable requirement, or should the patch be modified to load > mocha the same way as all the other test suites, which works fine with my > ancient version of rubygems?If the suite can work without the "gem" command, then why shouldn''t it? As you have said [*], other Mocha detection scripts in the framework don''t need it. Mocha gem has the "lib/mocha.rb" file, so it can be easily require''d. "soap4r" doesn''t have "soap4r.rb", on the other hand, so you must use the gem command: gem ''soap4r'' +1 for not using the gem command when a simple require is enough. [*] http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6703#comment:14 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> What is the general opinion on the minimum required version of rubygems to > run Rails? I''m running 0.8.11, and I''ve not yet had any problems running > the test suites or Rails itself.Wasn''t there a security issue with old rubygems? http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-0469>The patch currently attached to > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6703, will, if applied, mean that the > minimum version of rubygems required to run the test suite will be 0.9.0. > > Is this a reasonable requirement, or should the patch be modified to load > mocha the same way as all the other test suites, which works fine with my > ancient version of rubygems? > > - Matt > > > >-- Cheers Koz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 7/24/07, Michael Koziarski <michael@koziarski.com> wrote:> > > Wasn''t there a security issue with old rubygems? > > http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-0469Argh! ... 0.9.0 also? I guess I''ll have to uninstall the deb package and install latest rubygems manually. Thanks for the notice --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---