Development and application of patches seems to have ceased on the sqlserver adapter. I would love to share a patch that rolls up some of my patches and other patches gathered from trac. The only problem is that they would most likely fall of deaf ear. I officially want to volunteer my time as a someone who will help maintaining the sqlserver adapter. There are others out there who would like to help as well, and I encourage them to reply in this thread. There are plenty of improvements to the adapter including workarounds for limit/offsets, actually maybe even splitting the adapter into different versions to support 2000/2005, and I know some of us want to get a jump on support 2008. What do you think? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
I''m in. It might be beneficial to start a separate google group for this so our discussions don''t clutter the rails-core group. It would be great to get some momentum going on the SQL Server adapter! Rich C. On 6/22/07, bryanl <bryanliles@gmail.com> wrote:> > > Development and application of patches seems to have ceased on the > sqlserver adapter. I would love to share a patch that rolls up some > of my patches and other patches gathered from trac. The only problem > is that they would most likely fall of deaf ear. > > I officially want to volunteer my time as a someone who will help > maintaining the sqlserver adapter. There are others out there who > would like to help as well, and I encourage them to reply in this > thread. > > There are plenty of improvements to the adapter including workarounds > for limit/offsets, actually maybe even splitting the adapter into > different versions to support 2000/2005, and I know some of us want to > get a jump on support 2008. > > What do you think? > > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Hey, sorry about the lack of development. I''m going to try and pick things up over the next couple of months but after that I don''t intend to maintain it. So if either of you (Rich or Bryan) want to take over, I think you''ve both put more than enough work into it to qualify. A new group is a good idea (maybe a group for all adapters though, not just SQL Server as issues are ofter cross-adapter). Also, I understand there''s some work on allowing adapters to be provided by gems/plugins. That will make it much easier to distribute experimental features and should speed up the pace of development. Tom On 22/06/07, Rich Cox <conejo2005@gmail.com> wrote:> I''m in. It might be beneficial to start a separate google group for this so > our discussions don''t clutter the rails-core group. It would be great to > get some momentum going on the SQL Server adapter! > > Rich C. > > > > > On 6/22/07, bryanl <bryanliles@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Development and application of patches seems to have ceased on the > > sqlserver adapter. I would love to share a patch that rolls up some > > of my patches and other patches gathered from trac. The only problem > > is that they would most likely fall of deaf ear. > > > > I officially want to volunteer my time as a someone who will help > > maintaining the sqlserver adapter. There are others out there who > > would like to help as well, and I encourage them to reply in this > > thread. > > > > There are plenty of improvements to the adapter including workarounds > > for limit/offsets, actually maybe even splitting the adapter into > > different versions to support 2000/2005, and I know some of us want to > > get a jump on support 2008. > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
No problem Tom, I''ve been totally overwhelmed with stuff at work the last couple of months as well. It''s hard to find time for everything! I created a google group for SQL Server adapter discussions: http://groups.google.com/group/rails-sqlserver-adapter/ which should give us a place to discuss what we need to do w/o cluttering up the core group... Rich C. On 7/3/07, Tom Ward <tom@popdog.net> wrote:> > > Hey, sorry about the lack of development. I''m going to try and pick > things up over the next couple of months but after that I don''t intend > to maintain it. So if either of you (Rich or Bryan) want to take > over, I think you''ve both put more than enough work into it to > qualify. > > A new group is a good idea (maybe a group for all adapters though, not > just SQL Server as issues are ofter cross-adapter). Also, I > understand there''s some work on allowing adapters to be provided by > gems/plugins. That will make it much easier to distribute > experimental features and should speed up the pace of development. > > Tom > > On 22/06/07, Rich Cox <conejo2005@gmail.com> wrote: > > I''m in. It might be beneficial to start a separate google group for this > so > > our discussions don''t clutter the rails-core group. It would be great > to > > get some momentum going on the SQL Server adapter! > > > > Rich C. > > > > > > > > > > On 6/22/07, bryanl <bryanliles@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Development and application of patches seems to have ceased on the > > > sqlserver adapter. I would love to share a patch that rolls up some > > > of my patches and other patches gathered from trac. The only problem > > > is that they would most likely fall of deaf ear. > > > > > > I officially want to volunteer my time as a someone who will help > > > maintaining the sqlserver adapter. There are others out there who > > > would like to help as well, and I encourage them to reply in this > > > thread. > > > > > > There are plenty of improvements to the adapter including workarounds > > > for limit/offsets, actually maybe even splitting the adapter into > > > different versions to support 2000/2005, and I know some of us want to > > > get a jump on support 2008. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---